US Census Bureau
Skip top of page navigation

American Community Survey (ACS)


Skip top of page navigation
  Census >ACS Home > Ranking Tables Main > Ranking Tables 2000 Index > ...Speak a Language Other Than English at Home (Place Level)
Percent of People 5 Years and Over Who Speak a Language Other Than English at Home
Population 5 years and over (Place level)
Rank Place Percent Lower Bound Upper Bound
1 Santa Ana city, CA 83.3 80.3 86.3
2 Miami city, FL 74.6 71.0 78.2
3 El Paso city, TX 73.1 70.8 75.4
4 Los Angeles city, CA 58.3 57.1 59.5
5 Anaheim city, CA 56.0 50.6 61.4
6 San Jose city, CA 49.0 46.0 52.0
7 New York city, NY 46.3 45.6 47.0
8 San Francisco city, CA 45.4 44.6 46.2
9 San Antonio city, TX 44.9 43.1 46.7
10 Houston city, TX 43.6 42.8 44.4
11 Long Beach city, CA 40.7 36.4 45.0
12 Fresno city, CA 40.1 36.5 43.7
13 Newark city, NJ 38.9 34.1 43.7
14 Dallas city, TX 38.5 36.4 40.6
15 San Diego city, CA 38.4 36.3 40.5
16 Riverside city, CA 38.2 32.9 43.5
17 Oakland city, CA 37.4 32.5 42.4
18 Chicago city, IL 35.1 33.5 36.8
19 Honolulu CDP, HI 33.2 30.7 35.7
20 Tucson city, AZ 33.1 31.9 34.3
21 Phoenix city, AZ 31.8 29.5 34.1
22 Fort Worth city, TX 31.2 28.2 34.2
23 Boston city, MA 30.3 27.5 33.1
24 Sacramento city, CA 29.6 25.8 33.4
25 Austin city, TX 29.3 26.8 31.8
26 Albuquerque city, NM 27.8 25.2 30.4
27 Denver city, CO 25.5 22.7 28.3
28 Tampa city, FL 25.1 20.5 29.7
29 Las Vegas city, NV 23.5 20.5 26.5
30 Aurora city, CO 23.2 18.4 28.0
31 Arlington city, TX 22.4 18.4 26.4
32 St. Paul city, MN 21.0 18.2 23.8
33 Seattle city, WA 19.9 17.4 22.4
34 Mesa city, AZ 19.2 15.4 23.0
35 Raleigh city, NC 18.4 15.4 21.4
36 Philadelphia city, PA 18.0 16.8 19.2
37 Minneapolis city, MN 17.6 14.5 20.7
38 Portland city, OR 17.0 16.3 17.7
39 Anchorage municipality, AK 15.2 13.9 16.5
39 Washington city, DC 15.2 14.4 16.0
41 Milwaukee city, WI 15.0 13.2 16.8
42 Buffalo city, NY 14.1 10.6 17.6
43 Colorado Springs city, CO 14.0 11.7 16.3
44 Cleveland city, OH 13.0 10.7 15.3
45 Wichita city, KS 12.7 9.9 15.5
46 Charlotte city, NC 11.6 9.8 13.4
46 Oklahoma City city, OK 11.6 9.6 13.6
48 Nashville-Davidson (balance), TN 10.0 8.0 12.0
49 Omaha city, NE 9.8 9.3 10.3
49 Virginia Beach city, VA 9.8 7.8 11.8
51 Columbus city, OH 9.5 8.8 10.2
52 Jacksonville city, FL 9.2 7.6 10.9
52 Tulsa city, OK 9.2 7.9 10.5
54 Atlanta city, GA 8.4 5.8 11.0
54 Pittsburgh city, PA 8.4 6.3 10.5
56 Detroit city, MI 8.1 6.6 9.6
56 St. Louis city, MO 8.1 6.3 9.9
58 Kansas City city, MO 8.0 6.4 9.7
59 Indianapolis city (balance), IN 7.2 6.0 8.4
60 New Orleans city, LA 6.0 5.0 7.0
61 Toledo city, OH 5.7 3.9 7.5
62 Baltimore city, MD 4.9 4.1 5.7
63 Memphis city, TN 4.8 3.6 6.0
64 Cincinnati city, OH 4.1 2.9 5.3

  
View.....

this data in chart form

this table at state level

this table at county level

this table at place level

this table from 2003

this table from 2002

this table from 2001

this table from 2000

the Statistical Significance of this data (xls).

Go back to 2000 Index

 
      
 

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2000 Supplementary Survey

Notes

The table above shows the margin of error, represented by the lower and upper bounds of the 90-percent confidence interval. The confidence interval gives a range of values likely to include the population true value.  The smaller the confidence interval the more precise the estimate of the characteristic of interest.

An "N" entry in the estimate, lower bound, and upper bound columns indicates that data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number of sample cases is too small.

Top of page

Source: U.S. Census Bureau  |  American Community Survey Office  |  Page Last Modified: August 22, 2007