US Census Bureau
Skip top of page navigation

People Business Geography Newsroom Subjects A to Z Search@Census

American Community Survey (ACS)

Skip top of page navigation
  Census >ACS Home > Ranking Tables Main > Ranking Tables 2000 Index > Average Travel Time to Work… (Place Level)
Average Travel Time to Work of Workers 16 Years and Over Who Did Not Work at Home (Minutes)
Workers 16 years and over Who Did Not Work at Home (Place level)
Rank Place Average Lower Bound Upper Bound
1 New York city, NY 39.0 38.5 39.5
2 Chicago city, IL 33.2 32.2 34.2
3 San Francisco city, CA 29.5 29.0 30.0
4 Oakland city, CA 29.4 27.3 31.5
4 Newark city, NJ 29.4 26.9 31.9
4 Philadelphia city, PA 29.4 28.2 30.6
7 Miami city, FL 29.3 26.8 31.8
8 Riverside city, CA 29.0 25.9 32.1
9 Washington city, DC 28.7 28.0 29.4
10 Los Angeles city, CA 28.1 27.4 28.8
11 Baltimore city, MD 27.7 26.1 29.4
12 San Jose city, CA 26.6 25.6 27.6
13 Long Beach city, CA 26.3 24.8 27.8
14 Arlington city, TX 26.2 23.4 29.0
15 Houston city, TX 25.9 25.4 26.4
16 Anaheim city, CA 25.6 23.5 27.7
17 Boston city, MA 25.5 24.5 26.5
18 New Orleans city, LA 25.4 24.1 26.7
18 Seattle city, WA 25.4 24.2 26.6
20 Cleveland city, OH 25.3 24.0 26.6
21 Denver city, CO 25.2 23.7 26.7
22 Aurora city, CO 25.1 22.6 27.6
23 Dallas city, TX 24.9 23.7 26.1
24 Phoenix city, AZ 24.6 23.8 25.4
25 Mesa city, AZ 24.4 22.8 26.1
26 Santa Ana city, CA 24.2 22.2 26.2
27 Detroit city, MI 24.1 23.1 25.1
27 Las Vegas city, NV 24.1 22.8 25.4
27 Fort Worth city, TX 24.1 22.8 25.4
30 Atlanta city, GA 23.6 22.3 24.9
31 Portland city, OR 23.3 22.8 23.8
32 Charlotte city, NC 23.2 22.0 24.4
32 Cincinnati city, OH 23.2 21.6 24.9
34 Pittsburgh city, PA 22.9 21.3 24.6
34 Virginia Beach city, VA 22.9 21.1 24.7
36 Jacksonville city, FL 22.7 21.9 23.5
37 San Diego city, CA 22.6 21.8 23.4
38 Nashville-Davidson (balance), TN 22.1 21.1 23.1
39 Fresno city, CA 21.7 19.7 23.7
39 Indianapolis city (balance), IN 21.7 20.9 22.5
41 San Antonio city, TX 21.5 20.7 22.3
42 Sacramento city, CA 21.3 19.7 23.0
43 Honolulu CDP, HI 21.1 20.4 21.8
44 Tampa city, FL 20.9 19.4 22.4
44 Raleigh city, NC 20.9 19.7 22.1
46 Columbus city, OH 20.7 20.4 21.0
47 St. Louis city, MO 20.6 19.4 21.8
47 Milwaukee city, WI 20.6 19.4 21.8
49 Minneapolis city, MN 20.5 19.5 21.5
50 Tucson city, AZ 20.4 19.9 20.9
50 St. Paul city, MN 20.4 18.9 21.9
52 Memphis city, TN 20.1 19.1 21.1
52 Austin city, TX 20.1 19.3 20.9
54 Colorado Springs city, CO 19.8 18.3 21.3
54 El Paso city, TX 19.8 18.5 21.1
56 Kansas City city, MO 19.6 18.6 20.6
57 Albuquerque city, NM 19.5 18.5 20.5
58 Buffalo city, NY 18.7 17.1 20.4
59 Tulsa city, OK 18.5 16.5 20.5
60 Oklahoma City city, OK 18.3 17.6 19.0
61 Anchorage municipality, AK 17.8 17.1 18.5
62 Toledo city, OH 17.6 16.3 18.9
63 Omaha city, NE 17.5 17.0 18.0
64 Wichita city, KS 16.9 15.7 18.1

  
View.....

this data in chart form

this table at state level

this table at county level

this table at place level

this table from 2003

this table from 2002

this table from 2001

this table from 2000

the Statistical Significance of this data (xls).

Go back to 2000 Index

 
      
 

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2000 Supplementary Survey

Notes

The table above shows the margin of error, represented by the lower and upper bounds of the 90-percent confidence interval. The confidence interval gives a range of values likely to include the population true value.  The smaller the confidence interval the more precise the estimate of the characteristic of interest.

An "N" entry in the estimate, lower bound, and upper bound columns indicates that data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number of sample cases is too small.

Top of page

Source: U.S. Census Bureau  |  American Community Survey Office  |  Page Last Modified: August 22, 2007