US Census Bureau
Skip top of page navigation

American Community Survey (ACS)


Skip top of page navigation
  Census >ACS Home > Ranking Tables Main > Ranking Tables 2000 Index > ...Speak Spanish at Home (Place Level)
Percent of People 5 Years and Over Who Speak Spanish at Home
Population 5 years and over (Place level)
Rank Place Percent Lower Bound Upper Bound
1 Santa Ana city, CA 74.1 69.8 78.4
2 El Paso city, TX 69.8 67.8 71.8
3 Miami city, FL 65.1 60.8 69.4
4 Anaheim city, CA 43.5 37.2 49.8
5 Los Angeles city, CA 42.0 40.4 43.7
6 San Antonio city, TX 41.9 40.1 43.7
7 Houston city, TX 35.4 34.6 36.2
8 Riverside city, CA 33.5 27.9 39.1
9 Dallas city, TX 33.3 31.3 35.3
10 Tucson city, AZ 28.3 27.3 29.3
10 Fort Worth city, TX 28.3 25.5 31.1
12 Fresno city, CA 28.1 24.8 31.4
13 Phoenix city, AZ 27.5 25.2 29.8
14 Long Beach city, CA 25.6 21.6 29.6
15 New York city, NY 24.6 24.3 24.9
16 Newark city, NJ 23.9 19.9 27.9
17 San Diego city, CA 23.5 21.5 25.5
18 Austin city, TX 22.7 20.2 25.2
19 Chicago city, IL 22.6 21.3 23.9
20 Albuquerque city, NM 22.3 19.8 24.8
21 San Jose city, CA 21.0 18.5 23.5
22 Denver city, CO 20.4 17.9 22.9
23 Tampa city, FL 20.0 15.7 24.3
24 Oakland city, CA 19.4 14.8 24.0
25 Las Vegas city, NV 16.6 13.6 19.6
26 Mesa city, AZ 15.7 11.9 19.5
27 Aurora city, CO 13.5 10.5 16.5
28 Boston city, MA 13.0 11.2 14.8
29 Sacramento city, CA 12.6 9.3 15.9
30 Arlington city, TX 12.4 8.9 15.9
31 San Francisco city, CA 11.6 11.1 12.1
32 Raleigh city, NC 10.1 8.0 12.2
33 Milwaukee city, WI 9.1 7.8 10.4
34 Washington city, DC 8.0 7.7 8.3
34 Philadelphia city, PA 8.0 7.3 8.7
36 Colorado Springs city, CO 7.5 5.9 9.2
37 Cleveland city, OH 7.3 6.0 8.6
37 Oklahoma City city, OK 7.3 5.5 9.1
39 Wichita city, KS 7.2 5.7 8.7
40 Minneapolis city, MN 7.0 5.2 8.8
41 St. Paul city, MN 6.9 5.6 8.2
42 Buffalo city, NY 6.4 4.8 8.1
43 Omaha city, NE 6.1 5.8 6.4
43 Charlotte city, NC 6.1 4.5 7.8
45 Atlanta city, GA 5.8 3.3 8.3
45 Portland city, OR 5.8 5.3 6.3
47 Tulsa city, OK 5.5 4.3 6.7
48 Anchorage municipality, AK 4.5 3.8 5.2
48 Detroit city, MI 4.5 3.5 5.5
50 Kansas City city, MO 4.2 2.9 5.5
50 Nashville-Davidson (balance), TN 4.2 3.2 5.2
52 Jacksonville city, FL 4.1 3.4 4.8
53 Indianapolis city (balance), IN 3.5 2.7 4.3
54 Seattle city, WA 3.4 2.2 4.6
55 Toledo city, OH 3.3 1.7 5.0
56 New Orleans city, LA 3.0 2.2 3.8
56 Virginia Beach city, VA 3.0 2.2 3.8
58 Memphis city, TN 2.5 1.7 3.3
59 St. Louis city, MO 2.4 1.6 3.2
59 Columbus city, OH 2.4 1.9 2.9
61 Baltimore city, MD 2.2 1.5 2.9
62 Pittsburgh city, PA 2.0 1.2 2.8
63 Honolulu CDP, HI 1.1 0.6 1.6
64 Cincinnati city, OH 0.9 0.2 1.6

  
View.....

this data in chart form

this table at state level

this table at county level

this table at place level

this table from 2003

this table from 2002

this table from 2001

this table from 2000

the Statistical Significance of this data (xls).

Go back to 2000 Index

 
      
 

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2000 Supplementary Survey

Notes

The table above shows the margin of error, represented by the lower and upper bounds of the 90-percent confidence interval. The confidence interval gives a range of values likely to include the population true value.  The smaller the confidence interval the more precise the estimate of the characteristic of interest.

An "N" entry in the estimate, lower bound, and upper bound columns indicates that data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number of sample cases is too small.

Top of page

Source: U.S. Census Bureau  |  American Community Survey Office  |  Page Last Modified: August 22, 2007