US Census Bureau
Skip top of page navigation

People Business Geography Newsroom Subjects A to Z Search@Census

American Community Survey (ACS)

Skip top of page navigation
  Census >ACS Home > Ranking Tables Main > Ranking Tables 2000 Index > Median Housing Value of Specified Owner-Occupied Housing Units… (Place Level)
Median Housing Value of Specified Owner-Occupied Housing Units With a Mortgage (In 2000 Inflation-adjusted Dollars)
Specified owner-occupied housing units (Place level)
Rank Place Median Lower Bound Upper Bound
1 San Jose city, CA 430,747 419,996 441,498
2 San Francisco city, CA 429,103 418,909 439,297
3 Honolulu CDP, HI 387,427 376,412 398,442
4 Seattle city, WA 251,583 236,632 266,534
5 San Diego city, CA 235,791 228,325 243,257
6 Los Angeles city, CA 230,113 222,736 237,490
7 Oakland city, CA 227,641 186,879 268,403
8 Anaheim city, CA 221,436 207,140 235,732
9 Boston city, MA 218,512 204,581 232,443
10 New York city, NY 217,118 212,645 221,591
11 Long Beach city, CA 213,595 202,459 224,731
12 Santa Ana city, CA 204,783 188,417 221,149
13 Denver city, CO 173,346 165,558 181,134
14 Washington city, DC 166,282 159,367 173,197
15 Anchorage municipality, AK 162,455 159,218 165,692
16 Aurora city, CO 158,792 154,708 162,876
17 Raleigh city, NC 157,832 150,112 165,552
18 Portland city, OR 156,655 154,863 158,447
19 Colorado Springs city, CO 151,213 145,910 156,516
20 Atlanta city, GA 147,448 116,405 178,491
21 Austin city, TX 138,862 130,218 147,506
22 Riverside city, CA 137,774 133,106 142,442
23 Las Vegas city, NV 137,702 132,810 142,594
24 Charlotte city, NC 135,111 129,192 141,030
25 Sacramento city, CA 130,780 122,815 138,745
26 Albuquerque city, NM 130,731 125,309 136,153
27 Chicago city, IL 130,498 124,086 136,910
28 Virginia Beach city, VA 126,641 120,508 132,774
29 Minneapolis city, MN 125,143 118,787 131,499
30 Mesa city, AZ 124,423 119,770 129,076
31 Phoenix city, AZ 119,481 115,113 123,849
32 Nashville-Davidson (balance), TN 115,910 109,610 122,210
33 St. Paul city, MN 114,052 106,432 121,672
34 Miami city, FL 114,007 104,029 123,985
35 Columbus city, OH 102,617 100,672 104,562
36 Indianapolis city (balance), IN 102,398 098,212 106,584
37 Fresno city, CA 099,524 094,520 104,528
38 Tucson city, AZ 097,539 096,389 098,689
39 Arlington city, TX 096,684 093,980 099,388
40 Omaha city, NE 094,198 093,249 095,147
41 Cincinnati city, OH 094,052 085,380 102,724
42 Dallas city, TX 090,453 084,501 096,405
43 New Orleans city, LA 089,984 084,844 095,124
44 Jacksonville city, FL 087,689 084,811 090,567
45 Kansas City city, MO 083,712 078,892 088,532
46 Milwaukee city, WI 082,678 080,145 085,211
47 Tulsa city, OK 082,666 077,148 088,184
48 Tampa city, FL 081,995 077,161 086,830
49 Houston city, TX 081,461 079,610 083,312
50 Oklahoma City city, OK 079,891 075,156 084,627
51 Wichita city, KS 079,544 074,394 084,694
52 Toledo city, OH 075,850 072,585 079,115
53 Memphis city, TN 074,967 071,761 078,173
54 Cleveland city, OH 073,793 071,696 075,890
55 Fort Worth city, TX 073,256 067,676 078,836
56 El Paso city, TX 070,623 067,549 073,697
57 Baltimore city, MD 069,859 066,455 073,263
58 San Antonio city, TX 068,019 065,595 070,443
59 Detroit city, MI 067,395 064,590 070,200
60 St. Louis city, MO 063,111 056,676 069,546
61 Philadelphia city, PA 061,727 059,419 064,035
62 Buffalo city, NY 059,765 054,096 065,434
63 Pittsburgh city, PA 058,877 054,943 062,811
N Newark city, NJ N N N

  
View.....

this data in chart form

this table at state level

this table at county level

this table at place level

this table from 2003

this table from 2002

this table from 2001

this table from 2000

the Statistical Significance of this data (xls).

Go back to 2000 Index

 
      
 

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2000 Supplementary Survey

Notes

The table above shows the margin of error, represented by the lower and upper bounds of the 90-percent confidence interval. The confidence interval gives a range of values likely to include the population true value.  The smaller the confidence interval the more precise the estimate of the characteristic of interest.

An "N" entry in the estimate, lower bound, and upper bound columns indicates that data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number of sample cases is too small.

Top of page

Source: U.S. Census Bureau  |  American Community Survey Office  |  Page Last Modified: August 22, 2007