US Census Bureau
Skip top of page navigation

People Business Geography Newsroom Subjects A to Z Search@Census

American Community Survey (ACS)

Skip top of page navigation
  Census >ACS Home > Ranking Tables Main > Ranking Tables 2001 Index > Average Travel Time to Work…... (Place Level)
Average Travel Time to Work of Workers 16 Years and Over Who Did Not Work at Home (Minutes)
Workers 16 years and over Who Did Not Work at Home (Place level)
Rank Place Average Lower Bound Upper Bound
1 New York city, NY 38.2 37.7 38.7
2 Chicago city, IL 34.3 33.5 35.1
3 Stockton city, CA 30.4 27.1 33.7
4 Philadelphia city, PA 29.2 28.2 30.2
5 Los Angeles city, CA 29.1 28.4 29.8
5 Baltimore city, MD 29.1 27.6 30.6
7 San Francisco city, CA 28.9 28.4 29.4
8 Washington city, DC 28.5 27.8 29.2
9 Boston city, MA 27.2 25.9 28.5
10 Oakland city, CA 27.0 25.4 28.7
11 Anaheim city, CA 26.4 24.6 28.2
12 San Jose city, CA 26.3 25.3 27.3
13 Miami city, FL 26.2 24.1 28.3
14 Arlington city, TX 26.0 24.2 27.8
15 Riverside city, CA 25.8 23.7 27.9
16 Santa Ana city, CA 25.7 23.7 27.7
17 Long Beach city, CA 25.6 24.1 27.1
17 Houston city, TX 25.6 24.9 26.3
19 Mesa city, AZ 25.1 23.6 26.6
20 Aurora city, CO 25.0 23.8 26.2
21 Atlanta city, GA 24.5 22.9 26.2
22 Phoenix city, AZ 24.3 23.5 25.1
22 Detroit city, MI 24.3 23.5 25.1
22 Dallas city, TX 24.3 23.5 25.1
25 St. Louis city, MO 24.1 22.6 25.6
26 New Orleans city, LA 24.0 22.2 25.8
27 Las Vegas city, NV 23.6 22.6 24.6
27 Virginia Beach city, VA 23.6 22.4 24.8
29 Seattle city, WA 23.5 22.5 24.5
30 Cleveland city, OH 23.3 21.8 24.8
31 Denver city, CO 23.0 21.8 24.2
31 Pittsburgh city, PA 23.0 21.5 24.5
33 San Diego city, CA 22.8 22.0 23.6
34 Nashville-Davidson (balance), TN 22.7 21.7 23.7
34 Austin city, TX 22.7 21.5 23.9
36 Honolulu CDP, HI 22.6 21.6 23.6
37 Charlotte city, NC 22.5 21.5 23.5
37 San Antonio city, TX 22.5 21.5 23.5
39 Corpus Christi city, TX 22.4 20.4 24.4
39 Milwaukee city, WI 22.4 21.1 23.7
41 Sacramento city, CA 22.3 20.8 23.8
41 Jacksonville city, FL 22.3 21.5 23.1
41 Portland city, OR 22.3 22.0 22.6
41 Fort Worth city, TX 22.3 21.3 23.3
45 Fresno city, CA 22.1 19.1 25.1
45 Indianapolis city (balance), IN 22.1 21.3 22.9
47 St. Petersburg city, FL 21.9 20.3 23.6
48 Minneapolis city, MN 21.7 20.7 22.7
49 St. Paul city, MN 21.2 19.6 22.9
50 Cincinnati city, OH 21.1 19.5 22.8
51 Memphis city, TN 21.0 20.0 22.0
52 Tampa city, FL 20.8 19.3 22.3
53 Tucson city, AZ 20.2 19.9 20.5
53 Raleigh city, NC 20.2 18.7 21.7
53 El Paso city, TX 20.2 19.2 21.2
56 Columbus city, OH 20.0 19.7 20.3
57 Colorado Springs city, CO 19.8 18.8 20.8
58 Anchorage municipality, AK 19.5 18.8 20.2
59 Kansas City city, MO 19.3 18.5 20.1
59 Oklahoma City city, OK 19.3 18.5 20.1
61 Albuquerque city, NM 19.0 18.0 20.0
61 Buffalo city, NY 19.0 16.9 21.1
63 Toledo city, OH 18.2 17.2 19.2
64 Omaha city, NE 17.4 17.1 17.7
65 Tulsa city, OK 16.5 15.3 17.7
66 Wichita city, KS 16.4 15.4 17.4

  
View.....

this data in chart form

this table at state level

this table at county level

this table at place level

this table from 2003

this table from 2002

this table from 2001

this table from 2000

the Statistical Significance of this data (xls).

Go back to 2001 Index

 
      
 

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2001 American Community Survey

Notes

The table above shows the margin of error, represented by the lower and upper bounds of the 90-percent confidence interval. The confidence interval gives a range of values likely to include the population true value.  The smaller the confidence interval the more precise the estimate of the characteristic of interest.

An "N" entry in the estimate, lower bound, and upper bound columns indicates that data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number of sample cases is too small.

Top of page

Source: U.S. Census Bureau  |  American Community Survey Office  |  Page Last Modified: August 22, 2007