US Census Bureau
Skip top of page navigation

American Community Survey (ACS)


Skip top of page navigation
  Census >ACS Home > Ranking Tables Main > Ranking Tables 2001 Index > ...Less Than a High School Diploma (Place Level)
Percent With Less Than a High School Diploma
Population 25 years and over (Place level)
Rank Place Percent Lower Bound Upper Bound
1 Santa Ana city, CA 62.5 57.6 67.5
2 Miami city, FL 39.2 34.6 43.8
3 Long Beach city, CA 31.1 27.6 34.6
4 Stockton city, CA 31.0 26.5 35.5
5 Los Angeles city, CA 30.5 29.2 31.8
6 Detroit city, MI 30.0 27.7 32.3
7 Houston city, TX 29.2 27.9 30.5
8 El Paso city, TX 28.7 25.7 31.7
9 Buffalo city, NY 28.3 24.0 32.6
10 Anaheim city, CA 28.2 24.4 32.0
11 San Antonio city, TX 28.0 26.2 29.8
12 Chicago city, IL 27.7 26.4 29.0
12 Baltimore city, MD 27.7 25.2 30.2
14 St. Louis city, MO 27.6 24.5 30.7
14 Cleveland city, OH 27.6 24.8 30.4
16 Philadelphia city, PA 27.0 25.2 28.8
17 Dallas city, TX 26.1 24.1 28.1
18 Fresno city, CA 25.4 21.6 29.2
19 Corpus Christi city, TX 24.9 21.8 28.0
20 Oakland city, CA 24.2 20.4 28.0
21 Aurora city, CO 23.9 19.0 28.9
22 Phoenix city, AZ 23.7 21.7 25.7
23 New York city, NY 23.6 22.9 24.3
24 New Orleans city, LA 23.1 20.8 25.4
24 Fort Worth city, TX 23.1 20.8 25.4
26 Memphis city, TN 21.8 19.3 24.3
27 Sacramento city, CA 21.7 19.2 24.2
28 Tampa city, FL 20.2 17.1 23.3
28 Milwaukee city, WI 20.2 18.6 21.9
30 Washington city, DC 19.9 18.4 21.4
30 Kansas City city, MO 19.9 16.6 23.2
32 Riverside city, CA 19.6 15.6 23.6
33 San Diego city, CA 19.5 17.7 21.3
33 Atlanta city, GA 19.5 17.0 22.0
35 Boston city, MA 18.8 16.2 21.4
36 Mesa city, AZ 18.2 14.6 21.8
36 San Jose city, CA 18.2 16.4 20.0
36 Cincinnati city, OH 18.2 15.6 20.8
36 Oklahoma City city, OK 18.2 16.1 20.3
40 Tucson city, AZ 18.0 17.0 19.0
40 Denver city, CO 18.0 16.0 20.0
42 Las Vegas city, NV 17.8 15.7 19.9
43 Wichita city, KS 17.3 14.8 19.8
44 Honolulu CDP, HI 16.4 14.8 18.1
45 Pittsburgh city, PA 16.0 13.4 18.6
46 San Francisco city, CA 15.7 14.9 16.5
46 St. Petersburg city, FL 15.7 13.2 18.2
48 Indianapolis city (balance), IN 15.3 13.7 17.0
49 Arlington city, TX 15.1 11.8 18.4
50 Minneapolis city, MN 14.6 12.5 16.7
51 Toledo city, OH 14.4 11.8 17.0
51 Nashville-Davidson (balance), TN 14.4 12.4 16.4
53 Jacksonville city, FL 14.2 12.6 15.9
54 St. Paul city, MN 13.7 11.2 16.2
55 Austin city, TX 13.2 11.6 14.9
56 Charlotte city, NC 12.9 11.3 14.6
56 Columbus city, OH 12.9 12.1 13.7
58 Tulsa city, OK 12.6 10.3 14.9
59 Portland city, OR 12.4 11.7 13.1
60 Omaha city, NE 11.9 11.2 12.6
61 Colorado Springs city, CO 9.7 7.4 12.0
62 Seattle city, WA 9.5 8.2 10.8
63 Raleigh city, NC 9.1 6.8 11.4
64 Albuquerque city, NM 8.8 7.0 10.6
65 Anchorage municipality, AK 8.2 7.2 9.2
66 Virginia Beach city, VA 8.1 6.8 9.4

  
View.....

this data in chart form

this table at state level

this table at county level

this table at place level

this table from 2002

this table from 2001

this table from 2000

the Statistical Significance of this data (xls).

Go back to 2001 Index

 

 Note: This table was not
 produced in 2003
      
 

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2001 American Community Survey

Notes

The table above shows the margin of error, represented by the lower and upper bounds of the 90-percent confidence interval. The confidence interval gives a range of values likely to include the population true value.  The smaller the confidence interval the more precise the estimate of the characteristic of interest.

An "N" entry in the estimate, lower bound, and upper bound columns indicates that data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number of sample cases is too small.

Top of page

Source: U.S. Census Bureau  |  American Community Survey Office  |  Page Last Modified: August 22, 2007