US Census Bureau
Skip top of page navigation

People Business Geography Newsroom Subjects A to Z Search@Census

American Community Survey (ACS)

Skip top of page navigation
  Census >ACS Home > Ranking Tables Main > Ranking Tables 2001 Index > Median Housing Value of Specified Owner-Occupied Housing Units… (Place Level)
Median Housing Value of Specified Owner-Occupied Housing Units With a Mortgage (In 2001 Inflation-adjusted Dollars)
Specified owner-occupied housing units (Place level)
Rank Place Median Lower Bound Upper Bound
1 San Francisco city, CA 482,148 472,479 491,817
2 San Jose city, CA 475,260 461,349 489,171
3 Honolulu CDP, HI 381,169 368,083 394,255
4 Oakland city, CA 308,456 274,989 341,923
5 Seattle city, WA 304,590 292,043 317,137
6 San Diego city, CA 270,730 258,581 282,879
7 Anaheim city, CA 249,612 235,688 263,536
8 Long Beach city, CA 243,173 233,128 253,218
9 Los Angeles city, CA 242,267 235,924 248,610
10 Boston city, MA 233,200 217,891 248,509
11 New York city, NY 231,863 227,215 236,511
12 Santa Ana city, CA 220,680 210,099 231,261
13 Denver city, CO 196,246 190,332 202,160
14 Washington city, DC 176,260 167,928 184,593
15 Aurora city, CO 170,773 164,945 176,601
16 Anchorage municipality, AK 170,084 167,411 172,757
17 Colorado Springs city, CO 163,392 158,147 168,637
18 Atlanta city, GA 162,647 139,042 186,252
19 Portland city, OR 162,113 160,483 163,743
20 Stockton city, CA 155,911 146,635 165,187
21 Raleigh city, NC 154,626 146,693 162,559
22 Riverside city, CA 150,222 143,696 156,748
23 Sacramento city, CA 147,731 139,237 156,225
24 Austin city, TX 145,703 138,484 152,922
25 Las Vegas city, NV 143,328 138,883 147,773
26 St. Paul city, MN 142,918 136,948 148,888
27 Miami city, FL 142,792 133,273 152,311
28 Charlotte city, NC 141,104 136,819 145,389
29 Minneapolis city, MN 139,604 133,577 145,631
30 Chicago city, IL 137,104 131,159 143,049
31 Albuquerque city, NM 132,240 125,434 139,046
32 Virginia Beach city, VA 130,997 127,136 134,858
33 Mesa city, AZ 129,412 124,714 134,110
34 Phoenix city, AZ 125,559 121,482 129,636
35 Nashville-Davidson (balance), TN 120,116 115,951 124,281
36 Columbus city, OH 110,633 108,932 112,334
37 Indianapolis city (balance), IN 106,959 102,961 110,957
38 Fresno city, CA 106,690 99,399 113,981
39 Arlington city, TX 105,038 98,489 111,587
40 Tucson city, AZ 102,894 101,018 104,770
41 Cincinnati city, OH 99,671 91,208 108,134
42 Omaha city, NE 99,377 98,252 100,502
43 Dallas city, TX 97,609 94,217 101,001
44 New Orleans city, LA 97,565 90,351 104,779
45 Jacksonville city, FL 91,755 87,541 95,969
46 Tulsa city, OK 90,017 85,273 94,761
47 St. Petersburg city, FL 88,768 84,894 92,642
48 Tampa city, FL 87,103 82,688 91,518
49 Houston city, TX 86,817 84,725 88,909
50 Kansas City city, MO 86,010 82,736 89,284
51 Milwaukee city, WI 85,057 80,617 89,497
52 Oklahoma City city, OK 83,645 80,650 86,640
53 Toledo city, OH 83,080 79,838 86,322
54 Fort Worth city, TX 80,281 75,399 85,163
55 Wichita city, KS 78,237 74,374 82,100
56 Memphis city, TN 77,803 74,632 80,974
57 Cleveland city, OH 75,134 72,265 78,003
58 San Antonio city, TX 74,360 71,687 77,033
59 Detroit city, MI 74,323 70,795 77,851
60 Baltimore city, MD 74,216 71,017 77,415
61 El Paso city, TX 72,405 69,689 75,121
62 Corpus Christi city, TX 71,953 65,041 78,865
63 Philadelphia city, PA 64,934 62,627 67,241
64 St. Louis city, MO 62,699 58,402 66,996
65 Buffalo city, NY 60,605 54,286 66,925
66 Pittsburgh city, PA 55,691 51,827 59,555

  
View.....

this data in chart form

this table at state level

this table at county level

this table at place level

this table from 2003

this table from 2002

this table from 2001

this table from 2000

the Statistical Significance of this data (xls).

Go back to 2001 Index

 
      
 

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2001 American Community Survey

Notes

The table above shows the margin of error, represented by the lower and upper bounds of the 90-percent confidence interval. The confidence interval gives a range of values likely to include the population true value.  The smaller the confidence interval the more precise the estimate of the characteristic of interest.

An "N" entry in the estimate, lower bound, and upper bound columns indicates that data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number of sample cases is too small.

Top of page

Source: U.S. Census Bureau  |  American Community Survey Office  |  Page Last Modified: August 22, 2007