US Census Bureau
Skip top of page navigation

People Business Geography Newsroom Subjects A to Z Search@Census

American Community Survey (ACS)

Skip top of page navigation
  Census >ACS Home > Ranking Tables Main > Ranking Tables 2001 Index > ...Housing Costs for Renter-occupied Housing Units… (Place Level)
Median Monthly Housing Costs for Renter-occupied Housing Units(In 2001 Inflation-adjusted Dollars)
Specified renter-occupied housing units (Place level)
Rank Place Median Lower Bound Upper Bound
1 San Jose city, CA 1,231 1,165 1,297
2 San Francisco city, CA 1,049 1,028 1,070
3 Boston city, MA 944 899 989
4 Anaheim city, CA 926 885 967
5 Santa Ana city, CA 873 824 923
6 San Diego city, CA 863 840 886
7 Oakland city, CA 805 764 846
8 Virginia Beach city, VA 804 776 832
9 Austin city, TX 786 763 809
10 Anchorage municipality, AK 781 760 802
11 Honolulu CDP, HI 772 744 800
12 Colorado Springs city, CO 757 724 790
13 Seattle city, WA 743 720 766
14 New York city, NY 740 732 748
14 Raleigh city, NC 740 719 761
16 Denver city, CO 735 705 765
17 Las Vegas city, NV 732 699 765
18 Los Angeles city, CA 729 714 744
19 Aurora city, CO 721 657 785
20 Mesa city, AZ 713 683 743
21 Long Beach city, CA 704 676 732
22 Charlotte city, NC 700 674 726
23 Chicago city, IL 696 681 711
24 Sacramento city, CA 693 652 734
25 Arlington city, TX 686 655 717
26 Riverside city, CA 682 646 718
26 Minneapolis city, MN 682 649 715
28 Jacksonville city, FL 661 635 687
29 Washington city, DC 658 642 675
30 Portland city, OR 653 645 661
30 Dallas city, TX 653 635 671
32 Atlanta city, GA 645 615 675
32 Nashville-Davidson (balance), TN 645 627 663
34 Phoenix city, AZ 643 623 663
35 St. Paul city, MN 638 605 671
36 Stockton city, CA 633 574 692
37 Columbus city, OH 630 623 637
38 Houston city, TX 624 612 636
39 Fresno city, CA 621 590 652
40 Corpus Christi city, TX 618 585 651
41 Indianapolis city (balance), IN 612 591 633
42 Philadelphia city, PA 608 580 636
43 Pittsburgh city, PA 607 562 652
44 Memphis city, TN 605 585 625
45 Albuquerque city, NM 603 568 638
45 Fort Worth city, TX 603 577 629
47 New Orleans city, LA 599 571 627
47 Kansas City city, MO 599 576 622
49 Tampa city, FL 596 571 621
50 Omaha city, NE 594 582 606
51 St. Petersburg city, FL 588 517 659
52 Milwaukee city, WI 576 561 591
53 San Antonio city, TX 571 551 591
54 Miami city, FL 567 534 600
55 Baltimore city, MD 554 533 575
56 Tulsa city, OK 547 507 587
57 Wichita city, KS 544 486 602
57 Oklahoma City city, OK 544 526 562
59 Tucson city, AZ 543 535 551
60 Buffalo city, NY 529 519 539
61 Detroit city, MI 526 508 544
61 Cleveland city, OH 526 496 556
63 St. Louis city, MO 505 477 533
64 Toledo city, OH 491 458 524
65 El Paso city, TX 482 442 522
66 Cincinnati city, OH 477 454 500

  
View.....

this data in chart form

this table at state level

this table at county level

this table at place level

this table from 2003

this table from 2002

this table from 2001

the Statistical Significance of this data (xls).

Go back to 2001 Index

 

 Note: This table was not
 produced in 2000
      
 

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2001 American Community Survey

Notes

The table above shows the margin of error, represented by the lower and upper bounds of the 90-percent confidence interval. The confidence interval gives a range of values likely to include the population true value.  The smaller the confidence interval the more precise the estimate of the characteristic of interest.

An "N" entry in the estimate, lower bound, and upper bound columns indicates that data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number of sample cases is too small.

Top of page

Source: U.S. Census Bureau  |  American Community Survey Office  |  Page Last Modified: August 22, 2007