US Census Bureau
Skip top of page navigation

American Community Survey (ACS)


Skip top of page navigation
  Census >ACS Home > Ranking Tables Main > Ranking Tables 2001 Index > ...Housing Costs for Specified Owner-occupied Housing Units… (Place Level)
Median Monthly Housing Costs for Specified Owner-occupied Housing Units With a Mortgage
(In 2001 Inflation-adjusted Dollars)

Specified owner-occupied housing units (Place level)
Rank Place Median Lower Bound Upper Bound
1 San Jose city, CA 2,120 2,013 2,227
2 San Francisco city, CA 2,100 2,026 2,174
3 Honolulu CDP, HI 1,867 1,733 2,001
4 Seattle city, WA 1,676 1,595 1,757
5 Los Angeles city, CA 1,674 1,638 1,710
6 San Diego city, CA 1,651 1,605 1,697
7 New York city, NY 1,640 1,604 1,676
8 Oakland city, CA 1,636 1,422 1,851
9 Anaheim city, CA 1,612 1,506 1,718
10 Santa Ana city, CA 1,596 1,514 1,679
11 Long Beach city, CA 1,551 1,440 1,662
12 Boston city, MA 1,481 1,346 1,616
13 Anchorage municipality, AK 1,454 1,419 1,489
14 Washington city, DC 1,404 1,359 1,449
15 Chicago city, IL 1,316 1,265 1,367
16 Raleigh city, NC 1,313 1,244 1,382
17 Riverside city, CA 1,305 1,247 1,363
18 Austin city, TX 1,286 1,218 1,354
19 Denver city, CO 1,280 1,201 1,359
20 Miami city, FL 1,261 1,150 1,372
21 Colorado Springs city, CO 1,245 1,172 1,318
22 Aurora city, CO 1,235 1,174 1,296
23 Atlanta city, GA 1,228 1,129 1,327
23 Portland city, OR 1,228 1,208 1,248
25 Stockton city, CA 1,226 1,144 1,309
26 Charlotte city, NC 1,214 1,171 1,257
27 Sacramento city, CA 1,211 1,152 1,270
28 Virginia Beach city, VA 1,194 1,154 1,234
29 Arlington city, TX 1,192 1,144 1,240
30 Las Vegas city, NV 1,170 1,147 1,193
31 Dallas city, TX 1,147 1,078 1,216
32 St. Paul city, MN 1,144 1,080 1,208
33 Mesa city, AZ 1,142 1,107 1,177
34 Minneapolis city, MN 1,123 1,055 1,191
35 Nashville-Davidson (balance), TN 1,100 1,054 1,146
36 Albuquerque city, NM 1,098 1,052 1,144
37 Columbus city, OH 1,081 1,063 1,099
38 Phoenix city, AZ 1,066 1,040 1,092
38 Houston city, TX 1,066 1,028 1,104
40 Cincinnati city, OH 1,062 1,006 1,118
41 Tampa city, FL 1,050 963 1,137
42 Fresno city, CA 1,028 947 1,109
43 Fort Worth city, TX 1,014 948 1,080
44 Omaha city, NE 1,012 991 1,033
45 New Orleans city, LA 996 909 1,083
46 Indianapolis city (balance), IN 993 957 1,029
47 Baltimore city, MD 960 911 1,010
48 Wichita city, KS 956 895 1,017
49 Kansas City city, MO 953 917 989
50 Corpus Christi city, TX 952 891 1,013
51 Memphis city, TN 941 895 987
52 Tucson city, AZ 927 912 942
53 San Antonio city, TX 926 890 962
54 Milwaukee city, WI 915 879 951
55 Jacksonville city, FL 910 879 941
56 St. Petersburg city, FL 903 840 966
57 Tulsa city, OK 895 847 943
58 Buffalo city, NY 894 774 1,014
59 Pittsburgh city, PA 881 836 926
60 Philadelphia city, PA 877 851 903
61 Oklahoma City city, OK 873 845 901
62 Cleveland city, OH 867 804 930
63 Toledo city, OH 866 812 920
63 El Paso city, TX 866 835 897
65 St. Louis city, MO 844 793 895
66 Detroit city, MI 784 754 814

  
View.....

this data in chart form

this table at state level

this table at county level

this table at place level

this table from 2003

this table from 2002

this table from 2001

the Statistical Significance of this data (xls).

Go back to 2001 Index

 

 Note: This table was not
 produced in 2000
      
 

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2001 American Community Survey

Notes

The table above shows the margin of error, represented by the lower and upper bounds of the 90-percent confidence interval. The confidence interval gives a range of values likely to include the population true value.  The smaller the confidence interval the more precise the estimate of the characteristic of interest.

An "N" entry in the estimate, lower bound, and upper bound columns indicates that data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number of sample cases is too small.

Top of page

Source: U.S. Census Bureau  |  American Community Survey Office  |  Page Last Modified: August 22, 2007