US Census Bureau
Skip top of page navigation

People Business Geography Newsroom Subjects A to Z Search@Census

American Community Survey (ACS)

Skip top of page navigation
  Census >ACS Home > Ranking Tables Main > Ranking Tables 2001 Index > ...Housing Units That are Owner-occupied (Place Level)
Percent of Occupied Housing Units That are Owner-occupied
Occupied housing units (Place level)
Rank Place Percent Lower Bound Upper Bound
1 Mesa city, AZ 67.0 63.2 70.8
2 St. Petersburg city, FL 66.9 62.6 71.2
3 Virginia Beach city, VA 65.9 62.4 69.4
4 Aurora city, CO 64.4 60.4 68.4
5 El Paso city, TX 63.3 60.2 66.4
6 Albuquerque city, NM 62.5 59.0 66.0
7 Toledo city, OH 62.2 58.6 65.8
8 Jacksonville city, FL 62.1 59.6 64.6
9 Phoenix city, AZ 60.8 58.5 63.1
10 Anchorage municipality, AK 60.2 58.1 62.3
11 Omaha city, NE 59.6 58.4 60.8
12 Kansas City city, MO 59.0 55.9 62.1
13 San Jose city, CA 58.6 55.8 61.4
14 Detroit city, MI 58.2 56.1 60.3
15 Wichita city, KS 58.1 54.0 62.2
16 Oklahoma City city, OK 58.0 55.0 61.0
17 Las Vegas city, NV 57.8 55.0 60.6
18 St. Paul city, MN 57.4 53.4 61.4
19 Charlotte city, NC 57.2 54.4 60.0
20 Riverside city, CA 57.1 52.0 62.2
21 San Antonio city, TX 56.8 54.7 58.9
22 Philadelphia city, PA 55.9 53.8 58.0
23 Colorado Springs city, CO 55.2 51.9 58.5
24 Tulsa city, OK 55.0 51.7 58.3
24 Memphis city, TN 55.0 52.0 58.0
26 Fort Worth city, TX 54.8 51.7 57.9
27 Nashville-Davidson (balance), TN 54.6 51.5 57.7
28 Portland city, OR 54.4 53.2 55.6
29 Indianapolis city (balance), IN 54.3 52.3 56.3
30 Minneapolis city, MN 53.5 50.4 56.6
31 Corpus Christi city, TX 53.4 48.6 58.2
32 Tampa city, FL 52.5 48.7 56.3
33 Stockton city, CA 52.4 46.6 58.2
34 St. Louis city, MO 51.9 48.1 55.7
35 Pittsburgh city, PA 51.5 47.9 55.1
36 Tucson city, AZ 51.3 50.1 52.5
36 Raleigh city, NC 51.3 47.2 55.4
38 Arlington city, TX 51.0 47.0 55.0
39 Sacramento city, CA 50.8 47.0 54.6
40 Denver city, CO 50.2 47.6 52.8
41 Cleveland city, OH 49.6 46.0 53.2
42 Columbus city, OH 48.9 47.9 49.9
43 Baltimore city, MD 48.5 45.7 51.3
44 Anaheim city, CA 48.2 44.1 52.3
45 Milwaukee city, WI 48.0 45.0 51.0
46 New Orleans city, LA 47.3 44.2 50.4
47 Santa Ana city, CA 47.2 41.8 52.6
48 Fresno city, CA 47.0 43.0 51.0
48 Seattle city, WA 47.0 44.7 49.3
50 Atlanta city, GA 46.7 42.7 50.7
51 Austin city, TX 46.4 43.8 49.0
52 San Diego city, CA 46.2 44.2 48.2
53 Honolulu CDP, HI 46.0 43.9 48.1
54 Buffalo city, NY 45.3 40.7 49.9
54 Houston city, TX 45.3 43.8 46.8
56 Chicago city, IL 44.1 42.6 45.6
57 Dallas city, TX 42.3 40.5 44.1
58 Oakland city, CA 40.0 36.7 43.3
59 Washington city, DC 39.6 38.1 41.1
60 Long Beach city, CA 38.5 34.7 42.3
61 Los Angeles city, CA 37.3 36.1 38.5
62 Cincinnati city, OH 36.4 32.8 40.0
63 Boston city, MA 35.6 32.6 38.6
64 San Francisco city, CA 34.6 33.6 35.6
65 Miami city, FL 34.2 30.4 38.0
66 New York city, NY 29.3 28.6 30.0

  
View.....

this data in chart form

this table at state level

this table at county level

this table at place level

this table from 2003

this table from 2002

this table from 2001

the Statistical Significance of this data (xls).

Go back to 2001 Index

 

 Note: This table was not
 produced in 2000
      
 

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2001 American Community Survey

Notes

The table above shows the margin of error, represented by the lower and upper bounds of the 90-percent confidence interval. The confidence interval gives a range of values likely to include the population true value.  The smaller the confidence interval the more precise the estimate of the characteristic of interest.

An "N" entry in the estimate, lower bound, and upper bound columns indicates that data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number of sample cases is too small.

Top of page

Source: U.S. Census Bureau  |  American Community Survey Office  |  Page Last Modified: August 22, 2007