US Census Bureau
Skip top of page navigation

People Business Geography Newsroom Subjects A to Z Search@Census

American Community Survey (ACS)

Skip top of page navigation
  Census >ACS Home > Ranking Tables Main > Ranking Tables 2002 Index > Median Housing Value of Specified Owner-Occupied Housing Units… (Place Level)
Median Housing Value of Specified Owner-Occupied Housing Units With a Mortgage (In 2002 Inflation-adjusted Dollars)
Specified owner-occupied housing units (Place level)
Rank Place Median Lower Bound Upper Bound
1 San Francisco city, CA 530,662 515,071 546,253
2 San Jose city, CA 492,837 477,726 507,948
3 Honolulu CDP, HI 400,927 383,112 418,742
4 San Diego city, CA 340,310 329,237 351,383
5 Boston city, MA 314,177 278,573 349,781
6 Seattle city, WA 309,737 295,154 324,320
7 Oakland city, CA 309,188 273,386 344,990
8 Los Angeles city, CA 282,655 271,158 294,152
9 New York city, NY 277,237 269,533 284,941
10 Anaheim city, CA 276,957 254,194 299,720
11 Long Beach city, CA 274,903 250,343 299,463
12 Santa Ana city, CA 248,862 232,256 265,468
13 Washington city, DC 212,428 200,873 223,983
14 Denver city, CO 198,931 190,607 207,255
15 Sacramento city, CA 186,758 177,530 195,986
16 Aurora city, CO 186,438 182,514 190,362
17 Stockton city, CA 182,183 173,973 190,393
18 Atlanta city, GA 181,176 158,668 203,684
19 Anchorage municipality, AK 180,588 176,531 184,645
20 Colorado Springs city, CO 176,584 169,303 183,865
21 Raleigh city, NC 170,541 163,164 177,918
22 Portland city, OR 168,999 166,470 171,528
23 Riverside city, CA 168,452 161,085 175,819
24 Austin city, TX 161,616 149,437 173,795
25 Minneapolis city, MN 160,596 154,580 166,612
26 Charlotte city, NC 158,166 150,967 165,365
27 Miami city, FL 154,977 144,216 165,738
28 Chicago city, IL 154,187 147,043 161,332
29 Las Vegas city, NV 153,199 148,218 158,180
30 St. Paul city, MN 145,099 136,324 153,874
31 Virginia Beach city, VA 142,575 135,299 149,852
32 Mesa city, AZ 139,509 135,919 143,099
33 Lexington-Fayette, KY 132,927 125,730 140,124
34 Albuquerque city, NM 132,783 127,033 138,533
35 Phoenix city, AZ 129,667 125,341 133,993
36 Nashville-Davidson (balance), TN 121,607 115,408 127,806
37 Bakersfield city, CA 118,393 110,737 126,049
38 Fresno city, CA 118,304 108,805 127,803
39 Columbus city, OH 115,700 113,359 118,041
40 Arlington city, TX 115,051 108,644 121,458
41 Dallas city, TX 113,356 105,641 121,071
42 Tucson city, AZ 110,124 107,811 112,437
43 Indianapolis city (balance), IN 108,122 104,616 111,628
44 New Orleans city, LA 105,899 099,005 112,793
45 Omaha city, NE 104,615 102,161 107,069
46 Tampa city, FL 101,948 095,510 108,386
47 Jacksonville city, FL 101,453 097,274 105,632
48 Cincinnati city, OH 099,306 092,597 106,015
49 Kansas City city, MO 098,825 093,530 104,120
50 Houston city, TX 096,159 093,869 098,449
51 Milwaukee city, WI 090,801 086,900 094,702
52 Tulsa city, OK 090,367 085,744 094,990
53 Oklahoma City city, OK 089,820 084,560 095,080
54 Louisville city, KY 088,927 083,155 094,699
55 Toledo city, OH 087,080 083,201 090,959
56 Wichita city, KS 086,147 079,230 093,064
57 Fort Worth city, TX 085,409 078,626 092,192
58 Cleveland city, OH 082,387 078,569 086,205
59 St. Louis city, MO 079,639 071,483 087,795
60 Detroit city, MI 079,513 075,992 083,034
61 Corpus Christi city, TX 077,933 072,953 082,913
62 Memphis city, TN 077,249 073,634 080,864
63 Baltimore city, MD 075,160 072,385 077,935
64 El Paso city, TX 075,106 072,204 078,008
65 San Antonio city, TX 072,248 069,295 075,202
66 Philadelphia city, PA 066,226 063,837 068,615
67 Pittsburgh city, PA 060,129 056,042 064,216
68 Buffalo city, NY 051,064 045,302 056,826
N Newark city, NJ N N N

  
View.....

this data in chart form

this table at state level

this table at county level

this table at place level

this table from 2003

this table from 2002

this table from 2001

this table from 2000

this table as printable pdf

the Statistical Significance of this data (xls).

Go back to 2002 Index

 
      
 

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 American Community Survey

Notes

The table above shows the margin of error, represented by the lower and upper bounds of the 90-percent confidence interval. The confidence interval gives a range of values likely to include the population true value.  The smaller the confidence interval the more precise the estimate of the characteristic of interest.

An "N" entry in the estimate, lower bound, and upper bound columns indicates that data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number of sample cases is too small.

Top of page

  [PDF] or PDF denotes a file in Adobe’s Portable Document Format. To view the file, you will need the Adobe® Acrobat® Reader This link to a non-federal Web site does not imply endorsement of any particular product, company, or content. available free from Adobe.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau  |  American Community Survey Office  |  Page Last Modified: August 22, 2007