US Census Bureau
Skip top of page navigation

American Community Survey (ACS)


Skip top of page navigation
  Census >ACS Home > Ranking Tables Main > Ranking Tables 2002 Index > ...Foreign Born (Place Level)
Percent of Population That is Foreign Born
Total population (Place level)
Rank Place Percent Lower Bound Upper Bound
1 Miami city, FL 60.6 56.5 64.7
2 Santa Ana city, CA 48.4 44.8 52.0
3 Los Angeles city, CA 41.3 40.1 42.5
4 Anaheim city, CA 40.3 35.7 44.9
5 San Francisco city, CA 36.7 35.7 37.7
6 San Jose city, CA 36.5 34.0 39.0
7 New York city, NY 36.0 35.3 36.7
8 Long Beach city, CA 30.9 27.4 34.4
9 Houston city, TX 28.1 26.8 29.4
10 San Diego city, CA 27.9 26.3 29.6
11 Oakland city, CA 27.1 23.8 30.4
12 Boston city, MA 27.0 24.5 29.5
13 Dallas city, TX 26.5 24.7 28.3
14 Sacramento city, CA 26.4 23.1 29.7
15 Honolulu CDP, HI 25.5 23.2 27.8
16 El Paso city, TX 24.9 22.4 27.4
17 Stockton city, CA 24.2 20.1 28.3
18 Riverside city, CA 23.9 19.9 27.9
19 Fresno city, CA 22.7 19.1 26.3
20 Chicago city, IL 22.6 21.3 23.9
21 Newark city, NJ 22.4 17.5 27.4
22 Phoenix city, AZ 21.1 19.3 22.9
22 Las Vegas city, NV 21.1 18.6 23.6
24 Denver city, CO 20.2 17.7 22.7
25 Austin city, TX 19.6 17.0 22.2
26 Aurora city, CO 17.7 14.2 21.2
27 Minneapolis city, MN 17.6 14.6 20.6
28 Seattle city, WA 17.2 15.4 19.0
29 Arlington city, TX 16.6 13.1 20.1
30 St. Paul city, MN 16.3 13.8 18.8
31 Fort Worth city, TX 15.6 13.1 18.1
32 Washington city, DC 14.6 13.8 15.4
33 Tampa city, FL 14.0 11.5 16.5
34 Tucson city, AZ 13.8 12.8 14.8
35 Bakersfield city, CA 13.4 10.9 15.9
36 Portland city, OR 12.9 12.1 13.7
37 Mesa city, AZ 12.8 9.8 15.8
38 Raleigh city, NC 12.3 10.0 14.6
39 Charlotte city, NC 12.0 10.4 13.7
40 San Antonio city, TX 11.2 9.7 12.7
41 Oklahoma City city, OK 10.5 9.0 12.0
42 Albuquerque city, NM 10.0 7.5 12.5
42 Philadelphia city, PA 10.0 8.8 11.2
44 Milwaukee city, WI 9.5 8.0 11.0
45 Colorado Springs city, CO 9.4 7.1 11.7
46 Nashville-Davidson (balance), TN 9.0 7.8 10.2
47 Jacksonville city, FL 8.5 7.2 9.8
48 Wichita city, KS 8.2 6.6 9.9
49 Columbus city, OH 8.1 7.4 8.8
50 Anchorage municipality, AK 8.0 7.2 8.8
51 Lexington-Fayette, KY 7.8 5.8 9.8
52 Cleveland city, OH 7.6 4.8 10.4
53 Pittsburgh city, PA 7.3 5.5 9.1
54 Omaha city, NE 6.7 5.9 7.5
55 Detroit city, MI 6.4 4.6 8.2
56 Atlanta city, GA 6.3 4.2 8.4
56 Virginia Beach city, VA 6.3 5.1 7.5
58 Cincinnati city, OH 6.2 3.9 8.5
59 Baltimore city, MD 6.1 5.1 7.1
59 Tulsa city, OK 6.1 4.8 7.4
61 Corpus Christi city, TX 5.9 4.4 7.4
62 Kansas City city, MO 5.8 4.3 7.3
63 St. Louis city, MO 5.7 3.7 7.7
64 Indianapolis city (balance), IN 4.9 4.2 5.6
65 Buffalo city, NY 4.7 2.9 6.5
66 Memphis city, TN 4.2 3.2 5.2
67 New Orleans city, LA 3.4 2.6 4.2
68 Louisville city, KY 3.2 1.7 4.7
68 Toledo city, OH 3.2 2.0 4.4

  
View.....

this data in chart form

this table at state level

this table at county level

this table at place level

this table from 2003

this table from 2002

this table from 2001

this table as printable pdf

the Statistical Significance of this data (xls).

Go back to 2002 Index

 

 Note: This table was not
 produced in 2000
      
 

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2002 American Community Survey

Notes

The table above shows the margin of error, represented by the lower and upper bounds of the 90-percent confidence interval. The confidence interval gives a range of values likely to include the population true value.  The smaller the confidence interval the more precise the estimate of the characteristic of interest.

An "N" entry in the estimate, lower bound, and upper bound columns indicates that data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number of sample cases is too small.

Top of page

  [PDF] or PDF denotes a file in Adobe’s Portable Document Format. To view the file, you will need the Adobe® Acrobat® Reader This link to a non-federal Web site does not imply endorsement of any particular product, company, or content. available free from Adobe.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau  |  American Community Survey Office  |  Page Last Modified: August 22, 2007