US Census Bureau
Skip top of page navigation

American Community Survey (ACS)


Skip top of page navigation
  Census >ACS Home > Ranking Tables 2003 Index > ...Completed High School (Including Equivalency) (Place Level) > Confidence Interval Chart
/tr>
Percent of People 25 Years and Over Who Have Completed High School (Including Equivalency)Print a pdf of chart
Population 25 years and over (Place Level) Back to table format
Percent of People 25 Years and Over Who Have Completed High School (Including Equivalency) Place: Seattle city, WA 
Percent: 93.4 
Lower Bound: 92.2 
Upper Bound: 94.7 Place: Virginia Beach city, VA 
Percent: 92.7 
Lower Bound: 91.3 
Upper Bound: 94.1 Place: Colorado Springs city, CO 
Percent: 92.1 
Lower Bound: 90.1 
Upper Bound: 94.1 Place: Anchorage municipality, AK 
Percent: 90.9 
Lower Bound: 89.5 
Upper Bound: 92.3 Place: Raleigh city, NC 
Percent: 90.9 
Lower Bound: 88.7 
Upper Bound: 93.2 Place: Minneapolis city, MN 
Percent: 89.6 
Lower Bound: 87 
Upper Bound: 92.2 Place: Charlotte city, NC 
Percent: 89.1 
Lower Bound: 87.6 
Upper Bound: 90.7 Place: Pittsburgh city, PA 
Percent: 88.8 
Lower Bound: 86.7 
Upper Bound: 90.8 Place: Lexington-Fayette, KY 
Percent: 88.3 
Lower Bound: 85.4 
Upper Bound: 91.3 Place: Omaha city, NE 
Percent: 88.2 
Lower Bound: 87.3 
Upper Bound: 89.1 Place: Honolulu CDP, HI 
Percent: 87.9 
Lower Bound: 86.3 
Upper Bound: 89.6 Place: St. Paul city, MN 
Percent: 87.9 
Lower Bound: 85.5 
Upper Bound: 90.3 Place: Portland city, OR 
Percent: 87.5 
Lower Bound: 86.4 
Upper Bound: 88.5 Place: Albuquerque city, NM 
Percent: 87.4 
Lower Bound: 85.2 
Upper Bound: 89.6 Place: Columbus city, OH 
Percent: 87.3 
Lower Bound: 86.5 
Upper Bound: 88 Place: Tulsa city, OK 
Percent: 87 
Lower Bound: 84.6 
Upper Bound: 89.4 Place: Wichita city, KS 
Percent: 86.4 
Lower Bound: 84.6 
Upper Bound: 88.2 Place: San Francisco city, CA 
Percent: 86.3 
Lower Bound: 85.3 
Upper Bound: 87.2 Place: Jacksonville city, FL 
Percent: 85.7 
Lower Bound: 84 
Upper Bound: 87.4 Place: Oklahoma City city, OK 
Percent: 85.6 
Lower Bound: 83.7 
Upper Bound: 87.4 Place: Kansas City city, MO 
Percent: 85.3 
Lower Bound: 82.8 
Upper Bound: 87.8 Place: Mesa city, AZ 
Percent: 85.1 
Lower Bound: 82.1 
Upper Bound: 88.1 Place: Denver city, CO 
Percent: 85.1 
Lower Bound: 83.1 
Upper Bound: 87.1 Place: Boston city, MA 
Percent: 84.9 
Lower Bound: 82.7 
Upper Bound: 87.1 Place: San Diego city, CA 
Percent: 84.7 
Lower Bound: 83.3 
Upper Bound: 86.1 Place: Cincinnati city, OH 
Percent: 84.5 
Lower Bound: 81.4 
Upper Bound: 87.5 Place: Toledo city, OH 
Percent: 84.5 
Lower Bound: 82.1 
Upper Bound: 87 Place: Arlington city, TX 
Percent: 84.5 
Lower Bound: 81.6 
Upper Bound: 87.4 Place: Oakland city, CA 
Percent: 84.4 
Lower Bound: 81.7 
Upper Bound: 87.1 Place: Tucson city, AZ 
Percent: 83.8 
Lower Bound: 82.5 
Upper Bound: 85 Place: Indianapolis city (balance), IN 
Percent: 83.8 
Lower Bound: 82.1 
Upper Bound: 85.4 Place: Sacramento city, CA 
Percent: 83.2 
Lower Bound: 80.9 
Upper Bound: 85.5 Place: San Jose city, CA 
Percent: 83 
Lower Bound: 81.2 
Upper Bound: 84.7 Place: Atlanta city, GA 
Percent: 82.9 
Lower Bound: 80.5 
Upper Bound: 85.3 Place: Aurora city, CO 
Percent: 82.8 
Lower Bound: 79.1 
Upper Bound: 86.6 Place: Nashville-Davidson (balance), TN 
Percent: 82.2 
Lower Bound: 80 
Upper Bound: 84.4 Place: Austin city, TX 
Percent: 82 
Lower Bound: 79.6 
Upper Bound: 84.3 Place: Washington city, DC 
Percent: 81.7 
Lower Bound: 80.6 
Upper Bound: 82.8 Place: Tampa city, FL 
Percent: 81.4 
Lower Bound: 78.7 
Upper Bound: 84.2 Place: New Orleans city, LA 
Percent: 79.5 
Lower Bound: 77.1 
Upper Bound: 82 Place: Memphis city, TN 
Percent: 79.5 
Lower Bound: 77.2 
Upper Bound: 81.9 Place: Phoenix city, AZ 
Percent: 79.1 
Lower Bound: 77.5 
Upper Bound: 80.7 Place: Milwaukee city, WI 
Percent: 78.9 
Lower Bound: 76.3 
Upper Bound: 81.6 Place: Las Vegas city, NV 
Percent: 78.7 
Lower Bound: 76.1 
Upper Bound: 81.2 Place: Corpus Christi city, TX 
Percent: 78.7 
Lower Bound: 75.9 
Upper Bound: 81.6 Place: St. Louis city, MO 
Percent: 78.6 
Lower Bound: 76 
Upper Bound: 81.2 Place: Fort Worth city, TX 
Percent: 78.3 
Lower Bound: 76.2 
Upper Bound: 80.5 Place: Chicago city, IL 
Percent: 77.4 
Lower Bound: 76.2 
Upper Bound: 78.6 Place: San Antonio city, TX 
Percent: 76.9 
Lower Bound: 75.4 
Upper Bound: 78.4 Place: New York city, NY 
Percent: 76.5 
Lower Bound: 75.9 
Upper Bound: 77.2 Place: Bakersfield city, CA 
Percent: 76.2 
Lower Bound: 71.4 
Upper Bound: 80.9 Place: Buffalo city, NY 
Percent: 76.2 
Lower Bound: 73.1 
Upper Bound: 79.2 Place: Baltimore city, MD 
Percent: 75.5 
Lower Bound: 73 
Upper Bound: 78.1 Place: Philadelphia city, PA 
Percent: 74.9 
Lower Bound: 73.2 
Upper Bound: 76.7 Place: Detroit city, MI 
Percent: 74.5 
Lower Bound: 71.9 
Upper Bound: 77.1 Place: Fresno city, CA 
Percent: 73.9 
Lower Bound: 70.5 
Upper Bound: 77.2 Place: Long Beach city, CA 
Percent: 73.7 
Lower Bound: 70.1 
Upper Bound: 77.4 Place: Cleveland city, OH 
Percent: 73.3 
Lower Bound: 71 
Upper Bound: 75.6 Place: Houston city, TX 
Percent: 72.9 
Lower Bound: 71.5 
Upper Bound: 74.4 Place: Dallas city, TX 
Percent: 72 
Lower Bound: 70.1 
Upper Bound: 73.8 Place: Los Angeles city, CA 
Percent: 71.1 
Lower Bound: 69.9 
Upper Bound: 72.4 Place: Riverside city, CA 
Percent: 70.8 
Lower Bound: 66.1 
Upper Bound: 75.5 Place: Anaheim city, CA 
Percent: 70.2 
Lower Bound: 65.5 
Upper Bound: 75 Place: Stockton city, CA 
Percent: 69.1 
Lower Bound: 64.8 
Upper Bound: 73.4 Place: El Paso city, TX 
Percent: 66.5 
Lower Bound: 63.2 
Upper Bound: 69.9 Place: Newark city, NJ 
Percent: 64.3 
Lower Bound: 59.2 
Upper Bound: 69.4 Place: Miami city, FL 
Percent: 64.2 
Lower Bound: 60.3 
Upper Bound: 68 Place: Santa Ana city, CA 
Percent: 49.4 
Lower Bound: 43.9 
Upper Bound: 54.9
 

Note: The chart above shows the margin of error, represented by the lower (|-)and upper (-|) bounds of the 90-percent confidence interval. The estimate itself is represented by the center of the confidence interval (•). The confidence interval gives a range of values likely to include the population true value. The smaller the confidence interval the more precise the estimate of the characteristic of interest.
 
 
Top of page  
 

[PDF] or PDF denotes a file in Adobe’s Portable Document Format. To view the file, you will need the Adobe® Acrobat® Reader This link to a non-federal Web site does not imply endorsement of any particular product, company, or content. available free from Adobe.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau  |  American Community Survey Office  |  Page Last Modified: August 22, 2007