US Census Bureau
Skip top of page navigation

American Community Survey (ACS)


Skip top of page navigation
  Census >ACS Home > Ranking Tables 2003 Index (Main) > ...Foreign Born (Place Level)
Percent of Population That is Foreign Born
Total population (Place level)
Rank Place Percent Lower Bound Upper Bound
1 Miami city, FL 58.2 54.3 62.1
2 Santa Ana city, CA 50.8 46.8 54.8
3 San Jose city, CA 40.5 38.4 42.6
4 Los Angeles city, CA 40.2 39.1 41.2
5 Anaheim city, CA 37.2 33.3 41.1
6 San Francisco city, CA 35.5 34.5 36.6
6 New York city, NY 35.5 34.8 36.1
8 Riverside city, CA 31.5 26.6 36.4
9 Newark city, NJ 30.7 25.9 35.5
10 Long Beach city, CA 30.5 27.3 33.8
11 Boston city, MA 30.1 27.6 32.7
12 Houston city, TX 26.9 25.7 28.0
13 El Paso city, TX 26.7 24.0 29.3
14 Oakland city, CA 26.3 23.2 29.5
14 Dallas city, TX 26.3 24.3 28.3
16 Stockton city, CA 25.7 22.5 29.0
17 San Diego city, CA 25.4 23.4 27.5
18 Aurora city, CO 23.4 20.4 26.3
19 Honolulu CDP, HI 22.7 20.9 24.6
20 Phoenix city, AZ 22.1 20.4 23.8
21 Chicago city, IL 21.6 20.3 22.8
22 Fresno city, CA 20.5 17.9 23.1
22 Las Vegas city, NV 20.5 18.0 23.0
24 Austin city, TX 19.9 18.1 21.7
25 Arlington city, TX 19.3 16.4 22.2
26 Bakersfield city, CA 19.0 15.3 22.8
27 Sacramento city, CA 18.7 15.8 21.6
28 Fort Worth city, TX 17.4 15.3 19.6
29 Minneapolis city, MN 16.5 13.9 19.1
30 Seattle city, WA 16.4 14.6 18.1
31 Denver city, CO 15.9 13.8 17.9
32 St. Paul city, MN 15.8 13.1 18.4
33 Tucson city, AZ 15.0 13.7 16.3
34 Washington city, DC 14.9 14.2 15.6
35 Mesa city, AZ 14.4 11.5 17.4
35 San Antonio city, TX 14.4 13.0 15.8
37 Portland city, OR 13.5 12.4 14.5
38 Charlotte city, NC 13.2 11.4 14.9
39 Oklahoma City city, OK 11.1 9.5 12.7
40 Raleigh city, NC 10.7 8.2 13.2
41 Tampa city, FL 10.6 8.2 12.9
41 Albuquerque city, NM 10.6 8.4 12.8
43 Philadelphia city, PA 10.5 9.3 11.8
44 Columbus city, OH 9.4 8.5 10.2
45 Milwaukee city, WI 9.1 7.9 10.3
46 Wichita city, KS 8.8 7.3 10.3
47 Anchorage municipality, AK 8.7 8.0 9.5
47 Atlanta city, GA 8.7 6.6 10.7
49 Nashville-Davidson (balance), TN 8.4 7.1 9.8
50 Jacksonville city, FL 8.2 6.8 9.7
51 Kansas City city, MO 8.0 5.7 10.3
52 Omaha city, NE 7.9 7.3 8.5
53 Colorado Springs city, CO 7.6 5.8 9.4
53 Virginia Beach city, VA 7.6 6.2 9.0
55 Pittsburgh city, PA 7.3 4.5 10.0
56 St. Louis city, MO 7.2 5.2 9.2
57 Buffalo city, NY 7.1 3.3 10.8
58 Lexington-Fayette, KY 6.9 5.1 8.7
59 Indianapolis city (balance), IN 6.5 5.7 7.3
60 Corpus Christi city, TX 6.2 4.5 8.0
61 Tulsa city, OK 6.1 4.6 7.5
62 Detroit city, MI 5.9 4.2 7.6
63 Memphis city, TN 5.1 4.1 6.1
64 Baltimore city, MD 5.0 3.9 6.1
65 Cincinnati city, OH 4.2 2.7 5.6
66 New Orleans city, LA 4.0 3.3 4.6
67 Cleveland city, OH 3.2 2.4 4.1
68 Toledo city, OH 3.0 2.1 4.0

  
View.....

this data in chart form

this table at state level

this table at county level

this table at place level

this table from 2003

this table from 2002

this table from 2001

this table as printable pdf

the Statistical Significance of this data (xls).

Go back to 2003 Index

 

 Note: This table was not
 produced in 2000
      
 

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2003 American Community Survey

Notes

The table above shows the margin of error, represented by the lower and upper bounds of the 90-percent confidence interval. The confidence interval gives a range of values likely to include the population true value.  The smaller the confidence interval the more precise the estimate of the characteristic of interest.

An "N" entry in the estimate, lower bound, and upper bound columns indicates that data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number of sample cases is too small.

Top of page

  [PDF] or PDF denotes a file in Adobe’s Portable Document Format. To view the file, you will need the Adobe® Acrobat® Reader This link to a non-federal Web site does not imply endorsement of any particular product, company, or content. available free from Adobe.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau  |  American Community Survey Office  |  Page Last Modified: August 22, 2007