US Census Bureau
Skip top of page navigation

American Community Survey (ACS)


Skip top of page navigation
  Census >ACS Home > Ranking Tables 2003 Index > ...Housing Units That are Owner-occupied (Place Level) > Confidence Interval Chart
/tr>
Percent of Occupied Housing Units That are Owner-occupiedPrint a pdf of chart
Occupied housing units (Place Level) Back to table format
Percent of Occupied Housing Units That are Owner-occupied Place: Virginia Beach city, VA 
Percent: 69.2 
Lower Bound: 66.1 
Upper Bound: 72.2 Place: Aurora city, CO 
Percent: 68.6 
Lower Bound: 64.6 
Upper Bound: 72.6 Place: Bakersfield city, CA 
Percent: 66.5 
Lower Bound: 60.6 
Upper Bound: 72.4 Place: Mesa city, AZ 
Percent: 65.4 
Lower Bound: 62 
Upper Bound: 68.8 Place: Albuquerque city, NM 
Percent: 63.9 
Lower Bound: 61.5 
Upper Bound: 66.4 Place: Colorado Springs city, CO 
Percent: 63.6 
Lower Bound: 59.9 
Upper Bound: 67.2 Place: Jacksonville city, FL 
Percent: 62.7 
Lower Bound: 60.2 
Upper Bound: 65.3 Place: San Jose city, CA 
Percent: 62.6 
Lower Bound: 59.8 
Upper Bound: 65.5 Place: Anchorage municipality, AK 
Percent: 62.4 
Lower Bound: 60.4 
Upper Bound: 64.4 Place: Corpus Christi city, TX 
Percent: 62.1 
Lower Bound: 57.3 
Upper Bound: 67 Place: Wichita city, KS 
Percent: 61.6 
Lower Bound: 58.2 
Upper Bound: 65 Place: Arlington city, TX 
Percent: 60.9 
Lower Bound: 56.5 
Upper Bound: 65.3 Place: Las Vegas city, NV 
Percent: 60.8 
Lower Bound: 57.8 
Upper Bound: 63.8 Place: Denver city, CO 
Percent: 60.7 
Lower Bound: 57.6 
Upper Bound: 63.8 Place: Toledo city, OH 
Percent: 60.3 
Lower Bound: 56.1 
Upper Bound: 64.4 Place: El Paso city, TX 
Percent: 60.3 
Lower Bound: 56.8 
Upper Bound: 63.8 Place: Philadelphia city, PA 
Percent: 60.1 
Lower Bound: 58.3 
Upper Bound: 62 Place: Indianapolis city (balance), IN 
Percent: 59.7 
Lower Bound: 57.3 
Upper Bound: 62.1 Place: Omaha city, NE 
Percent: 59.7 
Lower Bound: 58.4 
Upper Bound: 61 Place: Fort Worth city, TX 
Percent: 59.7 
Lower Bound: 56.4 
Upper Bound: 63.1 Place: Phoenix city, AZ 
Percent: 59.4 
Lower Bound: 57 
Upper Bound: 61.8 Place: Oklahoma City city, OK 
Percent: 59.3 
Lower Bound: 56.3 
Upper Bound: 62.3 Place: Lexington-Fayette, KY 
Percent: 58.1 
Lower Bound: 53.9 
Upper Bound: 62.4 Place: St. Paul city, MN 
Percent: 57.4 
Lower Bound: 53.8 
Upper Bound: 61.1 Place: Tampa city, FL 
Percent: 57.3 
Lower Bound: 53.2 
Upper Bound: 61.4 Place: Detroit city, MI 
Percent: 57.1 
Lower Bound: 54.3 
Upper Bound: 59.8 Place: Charlotte city, NC 
Percent: 57 
Lower Bound: 53.8 
Upper Bound: 60.2 Place: Tulsa city, OK 
Percent: 56.6 
Lower Bound: 53.2 
Upper Bound: 59.9 Place: San Antonio city, TX 
Percent: 56.3 
Lower Bound: 54.1 
Upper Bound: 58.5 Place: Kansas City city, MO 
Percent: 56 
Lower Bound: 52.7 
Upper Bound: 59.3 Place: Nashville-Davidson (balance), TN 
Percent: 56 
Lower Bound: 53.2 
Upper Bound: 58.8 Place: Sacramento city, CA 
Percent: 55.8 
Lower Bound: 52.6 
Upper Bound: 59.1 Place: Portland city, OR 
Percent: 55.8 
Lower Bound: 54.4 
Upper Bound: 57.2 Place: Riverside city, CA 
Percent: 55.5 
Lower Bound: 50.1 
Upper Bound: 60.9 Place: Minneapolis city, MN 
Percent: 54.9 
Lower Bound: 51.5 
Upper Bound: 58.3 Place: Raleigh city, NC 
Percent: 54.9 
Lower Bound: 51.5 
Upper Bound: 58.4 Place: Baltimore city, MD 
Percent: 54.8 
Lower Bound: 51.9 
Upper Bound: 57.8 Place: Tucson city, AZ 
Percent: 54.6 
Lower Bound: 53.1 
Upper Bound: 56.1 Place: Memphis city, TN 
Percent: 54.3 
Lower Bound: 50.9 
Upper Bound: 57.6 Place: Columbus city, OH 
Percent: 53.5 
Lower Bound: 52.3 
Upper Bound: 54.7 Place: Pittsburgh city, PA 
Percent: 52.7 
Lower Bound: 48.9 
Upper Bound: 56.6 Place: Stockton city, CA 
Percent: 51.1 
Lower Bound: 45.8 
Upper Bound: 56.4 Place: New Orleans city, LA 
Percent: 51 
Lower Bound: 47.8 
Upper Bound: 54.1 Place: Fresno city, CA 
Percent: 50.2 
Lower Bound: 45.9 
Upper Bound: 54.5 Place: St. Louis city, MO 
Percent: 50 
Lower Bound: 45.8 
Upper Bound: 54.3 Place: Seattle city, WA 
Percent: 49.9 
Lower Bound: 47.3 
Upper Bound: 52.5 Place: Anaheim city, CA 
Percent: 48.6 
Lower Bound: 43.6 
Upper Bound: 53.7 Place: San Diego city, CA 
Percent: 48.5 
Lower Bound: 46.5 
Upper Bound: 50.5 Place: Austin city, TX 
Percent: 48.3 
Lower Bound: 45.7 
Upper Bound: 50.8 Place: Atlanta city, GA 
Percent: 48.2 
Lower Bound: 44.3 
Upper Bound: 52.1 Place: Chicago city, IL 
Percent: 47.4 
Lower Bound: 46.1 
Upper Bound: 48.8 Place: Oakland city, CA 
Percent: 46.9 
Lower Bound: 42.8 
Upper Bound: 51 Place: Buffalo city, NY 
Percent: 46.9 
Lower Bound: 42.6 
Upper Bound: 51.1 Place: Cleveland city, OH 
Percent: 46.9 
Lower Bound: 43.6 
Upper Bound: 50.2 Place: Honolulu CDP, HI 
Percent: 46.7 
Lower Bound: 44.7 
Upper Bound: 48.8 Place: Dallas city, TX 
Percent: 46.4 
Lower Bound: 44.2 
Upper Bound: 48.6 Place: Milwaukee city, WI 
Percent: 46.4 
Lower Bound: 43.3 
Upper Bound: 49.6 Place: Santa Ana city, CA 
Percent: 45.8 
Lower Bound: 40.1 
Upper Bound: 51.5 Place: Houston city, TX 
Percent: 44.9 
Lower Bound: 43.5 
Upper Bound: 46.2 Place: Long Beach city, CA 
Percent: 43.8 
Lower Bound: 39.9 
Upper Bound: 47.7 Place: Washington city, DC 
Percent: 42 
Lower Bound: 40.8 
Upper Bound: 43.2 Place: Los Angeles city, CA 
Percent: 40.4 
Lower Bound: 39.3 
Upper Bound: 41.6 Place: Boston city, MA 
Percent: 40.2 
Lower Bound: 37 
Upper Bound: 43.5 Place: San Francisco city, CA 
Percent: 38.7 
Lower Bound: 37.5 
Upper Bound: 39.8 Place: Cincinnati city, OH 
Percent: 38.4 
Lower Bound: 34.6 
Upper Bound: 42.2 Place: Miami city, FL 
Percent: 38 
Lower Bound: 34.2 
Upper Bound: 41.7 Place: New York city, NY 
Percent: 31.9 
Lower Bound: 31.2 
Upper Bound: 32.5 Place: Newark city, NJ 
Percent: 21.2 
Lower Bound: 16.5 
Upper Bound: 26
 

Note: The chart above shows the margin of error, represented by the lower (|-)and upper (-|) bounds of the 90-percent confidence interval. The estimate itself is represented by the center of the confidence interval (•). The confidence interval gives a range of values likely to include the population true value. The smaller the confidence interval the more precise the estimate of the characteristic of interest.
 
 
Top of page  
 

[PDF] or PDF denotes a file in Adobe’s Portable Document Format. To view the file, you will need the Adobe® Acrobat® Reader This link to a non-federal Web site does not imply endorsement of any particular product, company, or content. available free from Adobe.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau  |  American Community Survey Office  |  Page Last Modified: August 22, 2007