US Census Bureau
Skip top of page navigation

People Business Geography Newsroom Subjects A to Z Search@Census

American Community Survey (ACS)

Skip top of page navigation
  Census >ACS Home > Ranking Tables 2003 Index > ...Housing Units That are Owner-occupied (Place Level) > Confidence Interval Chart
/tr>
Percent of Occupied Housing Units That are Owner-occupiedPrint a pdf of chart
Occupied housing units (Place Level) Back to table format
Percent of Occupied Housing Units That are Owner-occupied Place: Virginia Beach city, VA Percent: 69.2 Lower Bound: 66.1 Upper Bound: 72.2 Place: Aurora city, CO Percent: 68.6 Lower Bound: 64.6 Upper Bound: 72.6 Place: Bakersfield city, CA Percent: 66.5 Lower Bound: 60.6 Upper Bound: 72.4 Place: Mesa city, AZ Percent: 65.4 Lower Bound: 62 Upper Bound: 68.8 Place: Albuquerque city, NM Percent: 63.9 Lower Bound: 61.5 Upper Bound: 66.4 Place: Colorado Springs city, CO Percent: 63.6 Lower Bound: 59.9 Upper Bound: 67.2 Place: Jacksonville city, FL Percent: 62.7 Lower Bound: 60.2 Upper Bound: 65.3 Place: San Jose city, CA Percent: 62.6 Lower Bound: 59.8 Upper Bound: 65.5 Place: Anchorage municipality, AK Percent: 62.4 Lower Bound: 60.4 Upper Bound: 64.4 Place: Corpus Christi city, TX Percent: 62.1 Lower Bound: 57.3 Upper Bound: 67 Place: Wichita city, KS Percent: 61.6 Lower Bound: 58.2 Upper Bound: 65 Place: Arlington city, TX Percent: 60.9 Lower Bound: 56.5 Upper Bound: 65.3 Place: Las Vegas city, NV Percent: 60.8 Lower Bound: 57.8 Upper Bound: 63.8 Place: Denver city, CO Percent: 60.7 Lower Bound: 57.6 Upper Bound: 63.8 Place: Toledo city, OH Percent: 60.3 Lower Bound: 56.1 Upper Bound: 64.4 Place: El Paso city, TX Percent: 60.3 Lower Bound: 56.8 Upper Bound: 63.8 Place: Philadelphia city, PA Percent: 60.1 Lower Bound: 58.3 Upper Bound: 62 Place: Indianapolis city (balance), IN Percent: 59.7 Lower Bound: 57.3 Upper Bound: 62.1 Place: Omaha city, NE Percent: 59.7 Lower Bound: 58.4 Upper Bound: 61 Place: Fort Worth city, TX Percent: 59.7 Lower Bound: 56.4 Upper Bound: 63.1 Place: Phoenix city, AZ Percent: 59.4 Lower Bound: 57 Upper Bound: 61.8 Place: Oklahoma City city, OK Percent: 59.3 Lower Bound: 56.3 Upper Bound: 62.3 Place: Lexington-Fayette, KY Percent: 58.1 Lower Bound: 53.9 Upper Bound: 62.4 Place: St. Paul city, MN Percent: 57.4 Lower Bound: 53.8 Upper Bound: 61.1 Place: Tampa city, FL Percent: 57.3 Lower Bound: 53.2 Upper Bound: 61.4 Place: Detroit city, MI Percent: 57.1 Lower Bound: 54.3 Upper Bound: 59.8 Place: Charlotte city, NC Percent: 57 Lower Bound: 53.8 Upper Bound: 60.2 Place: Tulsa city, OK Percent: 56.6 Lower Bound: 53.2 Upper Bound: 59.9 Place: San Antonio city, TX Percent: 56.3 Lower Bound: 54.1 Upper Bound: 58.5 Place: Kansas City city, MO Percent: 56 Lower Bound: 52.7 Upper Bound: 59.3 Place: Nashville-Davidson (balance), TN Percent: 56 Lower Bound: 53.2 Upper Bound: 58.8 Place: Sacramento city, CA Percent: 55.8 Lower Bound: 52.6 Upper Bound: 59.1 Place: Portland city, OR Percent: 55.8 Lower Bound: 54.4 Upper Bound: 57.2 Place: Riverside city, CA Percent: 55.5 Lower Bound: 50.1 Upper Bound: 60.9 Place: Minneapolis city, MN Percent: 54.9 Lower Bound: 51.5 Upper Bound: 58.3 Place: Raleigh city, NC Percent: 54.9 Lower Bound: 51.5 Upper Bound: 58.4 Place: Baltimore city, MD Percent: 54.8 Lower Bound: 51.9 Upper Bound: 57.8 Place: Tucson city, AZ Percent: 54.6 Lower Bound: 53.1 Upper Bound: 56.1 Place: Memphis city, TN Percent: 54.3 Lower Bound: 50.9 Upper Bound: 57.6 Place: Columbus city, OH Percent: 53.5 Lower Bound: 52.3 Upper Bound: 54.7 Place: Pittsburgh city, PA Percent: 52.7 Lower Bound: 48.9 Upper Bound: 56.6 Place: Stockton city, CA Percent: 51.1 Lower Bound: 45.8 Upper Bound: 56.4 Place: New Orleans city, LA Percent: 51 Lower Bound: 47.8 Upper Bound: 54.1 Place: Fresno city, CA Percent: 50.2 Lower Bound: 45.9 Upper Bound: 54.5 Place: St. Louis city, MO Percent: 50 Lower Bound: 45.8 Upper Bound: 54.3 Place: Seattle city, WA Percent: 49.9 Lower Bound: 47.3 Upper Bound: 52.5 Place: Anaheim city, CA Percent: 48.6 Lower Bound: 43.6 Upper Bound: 53.7 Place: San Diego city, CA Percent: 48.5 Lower Bound: 46.5 Upper Bound: 50.5 Place: Austin city, TX Percent: 48.3 Lower Bound: 45.7 Upper Bound: 50.8 Place: Atlanta city, GA Percent: 48.2 Lower Bound: 44.3 Upper Bound: 52.1 Place: Chicago city, IL Percent: 47.4 Lower Bound: 46.1 Upper Bound: 48.8 Place: Oakland city, CA Percent: 46.9 Lower Bound: 42.8 Upper Bound: 51 Place: Buffalo city, NY Percent: 46.9 Lower Bound: 42.6 Upper Bound: 51.1 Place: Cleveland city, OH Percent: 46.9 Lower Bound: 43.6 Upper Bound: 50.2 Place: Honolulu CDP, HI Percent: 46.7 Lower Bound: 44.7 Upper Bound: 48.8 Place: Dallas city, TX Percent: 46.4 Lower Bound: 44.2 Upper Bound: 48.6 Place: Milwaukee city, WI Percent: 46.4 Lower Bound: 43.3 Upper Bound: 49.6 Place: Santa Ana city, CA Percent: 45.8 Lower Bound: 40.1 Upper Bound: 51.5 Place: Houston city, TX Percent: 44.9 Lower Bound: 43.5 Upper Bound: 46.2 Place: Long Beach city, CA Percent: 43.8 Lower Bound: 39.9 Upper Bound: 47.7 Place: Washington city, DC Percent: 42 Lower Bound: 40.8 Upper Bound: 43.2 Place: Los Angeles city, CA Percent: 40.4 Lower Bound: 39.3 Upper Bound: 41.6 Place: Boston city, MA Percent: 40.2 Lower Bound: 37 Upper Bound: 43.5 Place: San Francisco city, CA Percent: 38.7 Lower Bound: 37.5 Upper Bound: 39.8 Place: Cincinnati city, OH Percent: 38.4 Lower Bound: 34.6 Upper Bound: 42.2 Place: Miami city, FL Percent: 38 Lower Bound: 34.2 Upper Bound: 41.7 Place: New York city, NY Percent: 31.9 Lower Bound: 31.2 Upper Bound: 32.5 Place: Newark city, NJ Percent: 21.2 Lower Bound: 16.5 Upper Bound: 26
 

Note: The chart above shows the margin of error, represented by the lower (|-)and upper (-|) bounds of the 90-percent confidence interval. The estimate itself is represented by the center of the confidence interval (•). The confidence interval gives a range of values likely to include the population true value. The smaller the confidence interval the more precise the estimate of the characteristic of interest.
 
 
Top of page  
 

[PDF] or PDF denotes a file in Adobe’s Portable Document Format. To view the file, you will need the Adobe® Acrobat® Reader This link to a non-federal Web site does not imply endorsement of any particular product, company, or content. available free from Adobe.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau  |  American Community Survey Office  |  Page Last Modified: August 22, 2007