US Census Bureau
Skip top of page navigation

American Community Survey (ACS)


Skip top of page navigation
  Census >ACS Home > Ranking Tables 2003 Index (Main) > ...Housing Units That are Owner-occupied (Place Level)
Percent of Occupied Housing Units That are Owner-occupied
Occupied housing units (Place level)
Rank Place Percent Lower Bound Upper Bound
1 Virginia Beach city, VA 69.2 66.1 72.2
2 Aurora city, CO 68.6 64.6 72.6
3 Bakersfield city, CA 66.5 60.6 72.4
4 Mesa city, AZ 65.4 62.0 68.8
5 Albuquerque city, NM 63.9 61.5 66.4
6 Colorado Springs city, CO 63.6 59.9 67.2
7 Jacksonville city, FL 62.7 60.2 65.3
8 San Jose city, CA 62.6 59.8 65.5
9 Anchorage municipality, AK 62.4 60.4 64.4
10 Corpus Christi city, TX 62.1 57.3 67.0
11 Wichita city, KS 61.6 58.2 65.0
12 Arlington city, TX 60.9 56.5 65.3
13 Las Vegas city, NV 60.8 57.8 63.8
14 Denver city, CO 60.7 57.6 63.8
15 Toledo city, OH 60.3 56.1 64.4
15 El Paso city, TX 60.3 56.8 63.8
17 Philadelphia city, PA 60.1 58.3 62.0
18 Indianapolis city (balance), IN 59.7 57.3 62.1
18 Omaha city, NE 59.7 58.4 61.0
18 Fort Worth city, TX 59.7 56.4 63.1
21 Phoenix city, AZ 59.4 57.0 61.8
22 Oklahoma City city, OK 59.3 56.3 62.3
23 Lexington-Fayette, KY 58.1 53.9 62.4
24 St. Paul city, MN 57.4 53.8 61.1
25 Tampa city, FL 57.3 53.2 61.4
26 Detroit city, MI 57.1 54.3 59.8
27 Charlotte city, NC 57.0 53.8 60.2
28 Tulsa city, OK 56.6 53.2 59.9
29 San Antonio city, TX 56.3 54.1 58.5
30 Kansas City city, MO 56.0 52.7 59.3
30 Nashville-Davidson (balance), TN 56.0 53.2 58.8
32 Sacramento city, CA 55.8 52.6 59.1
32 Portland city, OR 55.8 54.4 57.2
34 Riverside city, CA 55.5 50.1 60.9
35 Minneapolis city, MN 54.9 51.5 58.3
35 Raleigh city, NC 54.9 51.5 58.4
37 Baltimore city, MD 54.8 51.9 57.8
38 Tucson city, AZ 54.6 53.1 56.1
39 Memphis city, TN 54.3 50.9 57.6
40 Columbus city, OH 53.5 52.3 54.7
41 Pittsburgh city, PA 52.7 48.9 56.6
42 Stockton city, CA 51.1 45.8 56.4
43 New Orleans city, LA 51.0 47.8 54.1
44 Fresno city, CA 50.2 45.9 54.5
45 St. Louis city, MO 50.0 45.8 54.3
46 Seattle city, WA 49.9 47.3 52.5
47 Anaheim city, CA 48.6 43.6 53.7
48 San Diego city, CA 48.5 46.5 50.5
49 Austin city, TX 48.3 45.7 50.8
50 Atlanta city, GA 48.2 44.3 52.1
51 Chicago city, IL 47.4 46.1 48.8
52 Oakland city, CA 46.9 42.8 51.0
52 Buffalo city, NY 46.9 42.6 51.1
52 Cleveland city, OH 46.9 43.6 50.2
55 Honolulu CDP, HI 46.7 44.7 48.8
56 Dallas city, TX 46.4 44.2 48.6
56 Milwaukee city, WI 46.4 43.3 49.6
58 Santa Ana city, CA 45.8 40.1 51.5
59 Houston city, TX 44.9 43.5 46.2
60 Long Beach city, CA 43.8 39.9 47.7
61 Washington city, DC 42.0 40.8 43.2
62 Los Angeles city, CA 40.4 39.3 41.6
63 Boston city, MA 40.2 37.0 43.5
64 San Francisco city, CA 38.7 37.5 39.8
65 Cincinnati city, OH 38.4 34.6 42.2
66 Miami city, FL 38.0 34.2 41.7
67 New York city, NY 31.9 31.2 32.5
68 Newark city, NJ 21.2 16.5 26.0

  
View.....

this data in chart form

this table at state level

this table at county level

this table at place level

this table from 2003

this table from 2002

this table from 2001

this table as printable pdf

the Statistical Significance of this data (xls).

Go back to 2003 Index

 

 Note: This table was not
 produced in 2000
      
 

Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2003 American Community Survey

Notes

The table above shows the margin of error, represented by the lower and upper bounds of the 90-percent confidence interval. The confidence interval gives a range of values likely to include the population true value.  The smaller the confidence interval the more precise the estimate of the characteristic of interest.

An "N" entry in the estimate, lower bound, and upper bound columns indicates that data for this geographic area cannot be displayed because the number of sample cases is too small.

Top of page

  [PDF] or PDF denotes a file in Adobe’s Portable Document Format. To view the file, you will need the Adobe® Acrobat® Reader This link to a non-federal Web site does not imply endorsement of any particular product, company, or content. available free from Adobe.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau  |  American Community Survey Office  |  Page Last Modified: August 22, 2007