Introducing a new way to navigate by topics. Access the latest news, data, publications and more around topics of interest.
Our population statistics cover age, sex, race, Hispanic origin, migration, ancestry, language use, veterans, as well as population estimates and projections.
This section provides information on a range of educational topics, from educational attainment and school enrollment to school districts, costs and financing.
We measure the state of the nations workforce, including employment and unemployment levels, weeks and hours worked, occupations, and commuting.
Our statistics highlight trends in household and family composition, describe characteristics of the residents of housing units, and show how they are related.
Health statistics on insurance coverage, disability, fertility and other health issues are increasingly important in measuring the nation's overall well-being.
We measure the housing and construction industry, track homeownership rates, and produce statistics on the physical and financial characteristics of our homes.
The U.S. Census Bureau is the official source for U.S. export and import statistics and regulations governing the reporting of exports from the U.S.
The U.S. Census Bureau provides data for the Federal, state and local governments as well as voting, redistricting, apportionment and congressional affairs.
Search an alphabetical index of keywords and phrases to access Census Bureau statistics, publications, products, services, data, and data tools.
Geography provides the framework for Census Bureau survey design, sample selection, data collection, tabulation, and dissemination.
Geography is central to the work of the Bureau, providing the framework for survey design, sample selection, data collection, tabulation, and dissemination.
Find resources on how to use geographic data and products with statistical data, educational blog postings, and presentations.
The Geographic Support System Initiative will integrate improved address coverage, spatial feature updates, and enhanced quality assessment and measurement.
Work with interactive mapping tools from across the Census Bureau.
Find geographic data and products such as Shapefiles, KMLs, TIGERweb, boundary files, geographic relationship files, and reference and thematic maps.
Metropolitan and micropolitan areas are geographic entities used by Federal statistical agencies in collecting, tabulating, and publishing Federal statistics.
Find information about specific partnership programs and learn more about our partnerships with other organizations.
Definitions of geographic terms, why geographic areas are defined, and how the Census Bureau defines geographic areas.
We conduct research on geographic topics such as how to define geographic areas and how geography changes over time.
Visit our library of Census Bureau multimedia files. Collection formats include audio, video, mobile apps, images, and publications.
Collection of audio features and sound bites.
The Census Bureau packages data and information into easy-to-understand visuals.
Browse Census Bureau images.
Read briefs and reports from Census Bureau experts.
Watch Census Bureau vignettes, testimonials, and video files.
Read research analyses from Census Bureau experts.
Access data through products and tools including data visualizations, mobile apps, interactive web apps and other software.
Developer portal to access services and documentation for the Census Bureau's APIs.
Explore Census Bureau data on your mobile device with interactive tools.
Find a multitude of DVDs, CDs and publications in print by topic.
These external sites provide more data.
Download extraction tools to help you get the in-depth data you need.
Learn more about our data from this collection of e-tutorials, presentations, webinars and other training materials. Sign up for training sessions.
Explore Census data with interactive visualizations covering a broad range of topics.
Learn how we serve the public as the most reliable source of data about the nation's people and economy.
How we provide the best mix of timeliness, relevancy, quality, and cost for the data we collect.
Our researchers explore innovative ways to conduct surveys, increase respondent participation, reduce costs, and improve accuracy.
Our surveys provide periodic and comprehensive statistics about the nation, critical for government programs, policies, and decisionmaking.
Learn about other opportunities to collaborate with us.
Explore the rich historical background of an organization with roots almost as old as the nation.
Explore prospective positions available at the Census Bureau.
Information about the current field vacancies available at the U.S. Census Bureau Regional Offices.
Discover the latest in Census Bureau data releases, reports, and events.
The Census Bureau's Director writes on how we measure America's people, places and economy.
Find interesting and quirky statistics regarding national celebrations and major events.
Listen to audio files on fun facts, historical figures, and celebrations of the month.
Find media toolkits, advisories, and all the latest Census news.
See what's coming up in releases and reports.
Estimates from the CPS ASEC provide the measures of income and poverty that serve as the dependent variables in the regression models. The CPS ASEC estimates were chosen over those from the decennial census for several reasons. First, the CPS ASEC provides the only timely, consistent series of income and poverty estimates during the intercensal period. Second, the CPS ASEC is the official source of national poverty estimates. Third, if we relied on estimates from the most recent census as the dependent variable we would have to assume that the relationship between the dependent and predictor (administrative) variables remained constant during the postcensal period; events have already proven that assumption false. Hence, using the CPS ASEC data permits us to develop new sets of equations for each target year during the decade and these equations will reflect then-current relationships between income, poverty, and their predictor variables.
Choosing of the CPS ASEC as the dependent variable in our regression models has two consequences. First, postcensal estimates are not updates of the census income and poverty measures, because the CPS and the decennial census are known to estimate different measures of income and poverty; the model-based intercensal estimates are not directly comparable to the census (further information is available by returning to the Methodology page and consulting the "Cautions" section). Second, because the CPS ASEC sample size is relatively small, we divide the task of providing intercensal estimates for states and counties into related but separate modeling efforts. While the CPS ASEC sample sizes for some states are large enough to permit the derivation of direct state estimates for some of the key statistics, they are not sufficient for all statistics in some states or any statistics in most states. Direct, useable estimates from the CPS ASEC are possible for only a handful of counties, and only slightly more than one-third of all counties contain any sample households. The strategy of separating the state and county models was adopted because we felt that models constructed for states would be superior in terms of goodness-of-fit, and that their results could provide "controls" to which the weaker county estimates could be adjusted.
For the state regression models, single-year CPS ASEC estimates are used as the dependent variable. In the case of the county regression models, a three-year average of the CPS ASEC income and poverty estimates (e.g., 1992-1994 for 1993) is used. A county regression equation is estimated on the basis of observations from the 1200 counties included in the CPS ASEC sample. From this estimated equation and known values of administrative variables, a regression "prediction" is obtained for each county. For each county with sample cases in the CPS, the model prediction is combined with the direct sample estimate, with each component receiving a weight. The sum of the two weights for each county is 1.0; the weight for the model prediction component is the ratio of the sampling variance of the direct estimate to the total variance (sampling plus "lack of fit") of the direct estimate. Using this technique, the more uncertain the direct sample estimate, the larger the contribution from the regression model. These weights are commonly referred to as "shrinkage weights" and the final estimates as "shrinkage estimates." For counties which are not in the CPS sample, the estimates are based solely on the regression equation.
Shrinkage techniques are commonly used in estimating values for small geographic areas. We use them to help reduce the uncertainty of our estimates and to take advantage of all the information we have. However, significant reductions in variances are achieved only in a few counties where the CPS ASEC sample size is relatively large. The average of the weights on the direct CPS estimate, over all counties, is less than 0.02 for related children 5-17 and all people under age 18 in poverty, and less than 0.03 for people of all ages in poverty. Of course, over half the counties have zero weights on their direct estimates because they are not in the CPS sample. For only a handful of counties (7 to 49 depending on the poverty population being estimated and the year) are the weights on the direct CPS estimates 0.25 or more, and only 1 to 3 of these weights exceed 0.50.
The last step in our state and county estimation procedure is to use a simple
ratio technique to control the sum of the number in poverty to the state-level
estimates and the CPS ASEC national estimates. Estimated medians for counties
are not similarly controlled to state or national medians. For ease of reference,
we usually refer to the final county estimates as 'model-based'.