1. Name of Standard. Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata: Thematic Supplement for Geospatially Referenced Cultural and Demographic Data Metadata (the standard).
2. Explanation. The Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata specifies the information content of metadata for a set of digital geospatial data. Metadata are data about the content, quality, condition, and other characteristics of data. The Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC) developed the Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata to meet the metadata needs of the broad geospatial data community; as a result of the very nature of this approach specific thematic data needs were not addressed. The FGDC's Subcommittee on Cultural and Demographic Data developed this standard to supplement and be used with the Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata in order to address the specific thematic needs of the producers and users of cultural and demographic data while furthering an integrated approach to producing and using FGDC-compliant metadata.
The standard specifies the information content of metadata for a set of geospatially referenced cultural and demographic data. Metadata producers complying with the standard produce FGDC-compliant metadata as the standard requires completion of the metadata core which is comprised of the mandatory compound and data elements of the Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata. The purpose of the standard is to additionally define the compound and data elements integral for describing topical data sets by (1) identifying a geospatially referenced cultural and demographic data metadata core from the optional compound and data elements of the Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata, and (2) defining geospatially referenced cultural and demographic data user-defined compound and data elements to provide a more complete description of geospatially referenced cultural and demographic data.
3. Approving Authority. To be completed.
4. Maintenance Authority. The United States Department of Commerce - Bureau of the Census is responsible for the maintenance of the standard described in this document.
5. Related Documents. A list of references is contained in Appendix E.
6. Objectives. The objectives of the standard are to identify a common set of terminology and definitions for the documentation of geospatially referenced cultural and demographic data while furthering an integrated approach to metadata for geospatial data. The standard supplements, and is designed for use with, the Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata. The standard expands on the principles, rules, and compound and data elements of the Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata.
7. Applicability. The standard is for the documentation of the cultural and demographic content of geospatial data. It is a supplement to and for use with the Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata.
The standard applies to all topical data sets involving Federal funding for origination, distribution, or holding by all levels of government, academia, and the private sector. Future topical data sets with metadata complying to the standard will:
8. Specifications. The standard requires completion of the metadata core comprised of the mandatory compound and data elements of the Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata. The standard identifies a geospatially referenced cultural and demographic data metadata core comprised of optional compound and data elements from the Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata and assigns new obligations for their use and amends their domains. The standard additionally defines geospatially referenced cultural and demographic data user-defined compound and data elements and supplies source information, definitions, obligations, information about values to be provided for the data elements, and ordering of the compound and data elements. The standard introduces additional production rules for the user-defined compound and data elements.
9. Where to Obtain Copies. Copies of this publication are available from the Federal Geographic Data Committee Secretariat, in care of the U.S. Geological Survey, 590 National Center, Reston, Virginia 22902.
1. Subcommittee Responsibilities. The Federal Geographic Data Committee's (FGDC) Subcommittee on Cultural and Demographic Data (the Subcommittee) was formed in 1991. The Department of Commerce, exercising its responsibility for the coordination, management, and dissemination of geospatially referenced cultural and demographic data, delegated the Subcommittee lead agency responsibility to the Bureau of the Census. The Subcommittee's responsibilities partially include:
2. Participants. Member agencies of the Subcommittee participating in development of the standard include:
The Subcommittee defines geospatially referenced cultural and demographic data as having components of, but not being limited to, compilations of findings about the people and institutions of the United States and its territories: the characteristics of the people, the nature of the dwellings in which they live, the economic activities they pursue (such as the farms on and establishments or organizations for which they work), the facilities they use to support their health and recreational needs, the impact of humans on the environment and the environment on them, and the boundaries, names and numeric codes of the geographic entities used to report the data collected.
4. Goals. Goals pertinent to the development of the standard include:
The Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata was developed for all geospatial data, with an emphasis on direct spatially referenced data. Because of this, a large number of the compound and data elements defined in the Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata are not particularly relevant for describing indirectly spatially referenced cultural and demographic data. Additionally, as a result of the broadness of its approach, the Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata does not wholly address areas of importance in describing cultural and demographic data, specifically its topical and indirect spatially referenced aspects.
The intent of the Subcommittee in developing the standard is to (1) provide compliance with the Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata by requiring completion of the metadata core comprised of mandatory compound and data elements of the Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata, (2) provide guidance in using the optional compound and data elements defined in the Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata by identifying a geospatially referenced cultural and demographic data metadata core of optional compound and data elements defined in the Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata and assigning new obligations for their use and modifying their domains, and (3) identify additional compound and data elements for documenting the common components of geospatially referenced cultural and demographic data sets.
The Subcommittee believes the standard augments the Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata rather than replaces it, while at the same time provides a less positional and more thematic view of the data. By using the standard as a supplement with the Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata, the cultural and demographic data metadata producer creates FGDC-compliant metadata of significance to cultural and demographic data users.
2. Scope and Initial Study. Much of the standard development process was devoted to classifying geospatially referenced cultural and demographic data and determining the components important to describing this data. The Subcommittee formed a Working Group to define and inventory geospatially referenced cultural and demographic holdings and identify features (essence) of cultural and demographic data. Mini-conferences were held to summarize Federal agency needs related to the collection, use, sharing, and dissemination of geospatially referenced cultural and demographic base data.
The Subcommittee pursued both informal and formal methods to determine types of geospatially referenced cultural and demographic data important to Federal agencies. A cursory survey of Federal agencies was conducted in 1992. A more detailed survey followed in early 1994 to determine categories, category types, data topics and characteristics, geographic universe, the temporal dimension of the data, data sources, and categorization or classification schemes used for geospatially referenced cultural and demographic data. The community beyond that of Federal agencies was reached by hosting town meetings and panel discussions at professional organization conferences.
Additionally, the Internet was used to contact the geospatially referenced cultural and demographic data user community. A message requesting information was mailed to GIS-L (Listserve) and Usenet Newsgroups (comp.infosystems.gis and alt.planning.urban). The mailing is estimated to have reached over 50,000 persons world-wide.
The initial studies highlighted the diversity of geospatially referenced cultural and demographic data, indicating a significant volume of the data being collected and maintained which could be used by state and local governments and Federal agencies if there were standards in place facilitating knowledge of these particular types of data sets.
3. Work Plan. To respond to community needs and to the FGDC mandates, the Subcommittee developed a geospatially referenced cultural and demographic data metadata standard to be used as an alternate to (while augmenting) the Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata. The initial effort, titled Content Standard for Cultural and Demographic Data Metadata (draft), was submitted to the FGDC's Standard Working Group (SWG) for review in June, 1995. In their consideration of the proposed standard, the SWG determined an integrated approach to geospatial metadata would best meet the needs of the entire geospatial data community and asked the Subcommittee to revise its initial standard and present it as a supplement to the Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata. The Subcommittee agreed and worked with the FGDC Secretariat to ensure the standard would complement a proposed revision of the Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata, enhancing the direction of metadata in response to comments received from the geospatial data community.
4. Assumptions for the Standard. The Subcommittee used the following assumptions in developing the standard:
5. Description of Components. The standard contains three parts, each of which must be completed for metadata produced using the standard to be FGDC-compliant:
1. A Reference Model: Geospatial Data. Successful creation of the Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Data was due in part to an unwritten understanding or perception of the fundamental units of geospatial data. The fundamental units of geospatial data appear to be the geographic units of points, lines, and areas (and volume or surface under special circumstances). Base features developed from these units form an important framework for such operations as delineating the boundaries of higher level geographic units. Base features may include roads, rivers, pipelines, etc. The exact features that organizations categorize as necessary base features varies and depends on the organizations' requirements for, and use of, a database and extractions from it.
The basic building blocks used to construct both the higher geographic units and the base features are points, lines, and areas (polygons). The building blocks are considered as being positioned through the use of commonly accepted coordinate systems (often latitude/longitude). Different organizations have different terminology for the building blocks as well as different coordinate schemes. This fundamental model and the common building blocks are depicted graphically in Figure 1.
2. A Model for Cultural and Demographic Data. Whereas for geospatial data there exist the fundamental units of points, lines, or areas, a corresponding data unit for cultural and demographic data is elusive at present and difficult to conceptualize. Cultural and demographic data are the data contained in or represented by the geographic framework units.
The identification of the basic cultural and demographic data unit seems to be centered on three questions:
It appears all cultural and demographic data fits into at least one and possibly more of these categories similar to the way in which typical geographic data may be categorized as points, lines, and areas. Loosely applying the "geometric" model, one can consider the human as the point, society as the line (linking humans and bounding activities), and activities as taking place over or in relation to an area. And just as there appears to be a common reference to all typical geographic features by position, there appears to be a common reference to all cultural and demographic data by count, such as its number or amount. Figure 2 depicts this model graphically.
The standard uses this conceptual data model in identifying the geospatially referenced cultural and demographic data metadata core and defining geospatially referenced cultural and demographic data user-defined metadata elements. The model additionally requires the introduction of new production rules for use with the geospatially referenced cultural and demographic data user-defined metadata elements as fundamental to describing the cultural and demographic data subject matter content (themes). Theme prioritizing, i.e. hierarchical or nested relationships, is the most difficult task for the metadata producer given the complexity of ideas which can make up a data set.
Appendix A is a series of diagrams applying the Federal Information Processing Standards Publication 183: Integration Definition for Function Modeling (IDEF0) (FIPS PUB 183). IDEF0 modeling language and associated rules and techniques develop a structured graphic representation of the function "Produce FGDC-compliant metadata for geospatially referenced cultural and demographic data," clearly illustrating the relationship between the standard and the Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata.
Section 1 refers the metadata producer to the Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata for the mandatory compound and data elements which comprise the metadata core.
Section 2 identifies the optional compound and data elements of the Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata which are considered essential for describing the cultural and demographic content of data sets and comprise the geospatially referenced cultural and demographic data metadata core. The metadata producer is referred to the Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata for definitions, which remain unchanged. Obligations are changed and domains may be modified. New obligations and restrictions and/or additions to domains which supersede those found in the Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata are provided.
Section 3 provides the names and definitions of the geospatially referenced cultural and demographic data user-defined compound and data elements. The source, obligation for use, element the compound or data element leads or follows, type, and domain are provided.
Compound Elements
Unchanged; refer to the Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata.
Production Rules
The existing production rules and symbols as defined in the Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata apply to the standard and remain unchanged; refer to the Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata.
Given the complexity of relationships within the cultural and demographic component of a data set, e.g. the hierarchical ordering and/or nesting of themes, the standard identifies two additional production rules which are applicable only to the geospatially referenced cultural and demographic data user-defined data elements of Section 3. The symbols used in the production rules have the following meaning:
Data Elements
Unchanged; refer to the Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata.
Calendar Dates (Years, Months, and Days)
Unchanged; refer to the Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata.
Time of Day (Hours, Minutes, and Seconds)
Unchanged; refer to the Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata.
Latitude and Longiude
Unchanged; refer to the Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata.
Network Addresses and File Names
Unchanged; refer to the Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata.
The obligation of this section is mandatory--it must be completed by the metadata producer.
All compound and data elements of this section are mandatory--they must be completed by the metadata producer.
Refer to the Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata for the compound and data elements comprising the Metadata Core, their definitions, type, domains, and production rules.
Editor's Note: The following listing is included for information only while the standard is being developed and will NOT be placed in the final standard. The listing consists of the probable Metadata Core data elements from the DOI (Yellowstone) Core (bold text). The compound elements they nest under and which are not specifically mentioned in the DOI (YHellowstone) Core are included for reference (plain text.) The DOI (Yellowstone) Core reference data element name is included in parenthesis when it differs from the Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata data element name.
The obligation of this section is mandatory--it must be completed by the metadata producer.
Refer to the Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata for the definitions of the compound and data elements comprising the Geospatially Referenced Cultural and Demographic Data Metadata Core. Production rules, types, and domains are provided below (this information may vary from the information provided in the Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Data and supersedes it).
------------------------------------------------------
The obligation of this section is mandatory--it must be completed by the metadata producer.
Name, definition, production rules, types, and domains are provided below. Additionally, source and the element from the Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata the compound or data element leads or follows is given.
------------------------------------------------------
Editor's Note: The data element "Tag" may be placed preceding or following any of the above compound or data elements.
Domain: Major Theme Description
The following descriptions elaborate on each item in the domain, suggesting but in no way limiting the types of data within each Major Theme Description.
Domain: Minor Theme Description
A brief definition of each item (the demographic application of an item was selected when several definitions were available.) These domain items are offered only as suggestions; the list of items is not meant to be either exclusive or comprehensive. If the provided items do not meet the metadata producer's needs, alternative items may be found in the common set of terminology and definitions for spatial features provided in FIPS PUB 173, Spatial Data Transfer Standard (SDTS), or any subject- matter thesaurus.
OVERVIEW
INTRODUCTION TO THE STANDARD
Background
This document presents the Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata: Thematic Supplement for Geospatially Referenced Cultural and Demographic Data Metadata as developed by the Subcommittee from August 1993 through ___________. During that time, the Subcommittee met as a whole a number of times, conducted a governmentwide survey of cultural and demographic data, held open forums, and responded with comments to drafts of the standard to resolve specific issues.
3. Mission. To promote the collection, use, and sharing of geospatially referenced cultural and demographic data.
Approach
1. Intent. The Subcommittee recognizes cultural and demographic data encompasses many and diverse groups of data. The variety and diversity of cultural and demographic data make this data more difficult to describe and categorize than other data. Notwithstanding their diversity, cultural and demographic data sets share two common components. These components include (1) the thematic, or topical, nature of the data and (2) the geographic aspect of the data. Cultural and demographic data sets are almost always geospatial; however, rather than being directly spatially referenced the data are most often indirectly spatially referenced.
MODELING THE DATA AND THE STANDARD
Modeling the Data
Modeling the Standard
Metadata producers using the standard as a supplement to the Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata will describe the cultural and demographic data content of a data set and, additionally, achieve the larger goal of producing geospatial metadata for a data set.
ORGANIZATION OF THE STANDARD
Sections
The standard is organized in three mandatory sections. Each section is comprised of compound and data elements which, when taken together, define required information content for metadata to document a set of geospatially referenced cultural and demographic data. The sections are distinguished by the origin and the obligations for use of their compound and data elements:
SECTION 1. METADATA CORE
SECTION 2. GEOSPATIALLY REFERENCED CULTURAL AND DEMOGRAPHIC DATA METADATA CORE
Editor's Note: Theme Keyword must match a response to the geospatially referenced cultural and demographic data user-defined metadata element Major Theme
Editor's Note: Place Keyword must match a response to the geospatially referenced cultural and demographic data user-defined metadata element Geographic Extent Description.
SECTION 3. GEOSPATIALLY REFERENCED CULTURAL AND DEMOGRAPHIC DATA USER-DEFINED METADATA
Appendixes
Appendix B: Alphabetical List of Compound and Data Elements
Abstract
Access Constraints
Address
Address Type
Attribute Accuracy
Attribute Accuracy Explanation
Attribute Accuracy Report
Attribute Accuracy Value
Available Time Period
Bounding Coordinates
Citation
Citation Information
City
Completeness Report
Computed Value
Computer Contact Information
Contact Address
Contact Information
Contact Organization Primary
Contact Person Primary
Contact Voice Telephone
Currentness Reference
Custom Order Process
Data Quality Information
Definition/Classification
Description
Dialup File Name
Dialup Instructions
Dialup Telephone
Digital Transfer Options
Digital Form
Distribution Information
Digital Transfer Information
Distribution Liability
Distributor
East Bounding Coordinate
Fees
File Decompression Technique
Format Information Content
Format Name
Format Specification
Format Version Number
Format Version Name
Format Version Date
Geographic Entity
Geographic Entity Type
Geographic Entity Unit
Geographic Extent
Geographic Extent Description
Horizontal Positional Accuracy
Horizontal Positional Accuracy Explanation
Horizontal Positional Accuracy Report
Horizontal Positional Accuracy Value
Identification Information
Keywords
Lineage
Logical Consistency Report
Main Theme
Maintenance and Update Frequency
Major Theme Description
Metadata Date
Metadata Review
Metadata Standard Name
Metadata Standard Version
Metadata Reference Information
Metadata Time Convention
Minor Theme Description
Missing Geographic Entity Unit
Missing Geographic Entity Unit Identifier
Missing Geography
Network Address
Network Resource Name
Non Digital Form
North Bounding Coordinate
Offline Media
Offline Option
Online Option
Ordering Instructions
Originator
Place
Place Keyword
Positional Accuracy
Postal Code
Process Date
Process Description
Process Step
Process Time
Progress
Publication Date
Purpose
Quantitative Attribute Accuracy Assessment
Quantitative Horizontal Positional Accuracy Assessment
Quantitative Vertical Positional Accuracy Assessment
Resource Description
Scalar
Security Classification
Security Classification System
Security Handling Description
Security Information
Source Citation
Source Citation Abbreviation
Source Contribution
Source Currentness Reference
Source Information
Source Produced Citation Abbreviation
Source Scale Denominator
Source Time Period of Content
Source Used Citation Abbreviation
South Bounding Coordinate
Spatial Domain
Standard Order Process
State
Status
Tag
Technical Prerequisites
Theme
Theme Keyword
Time Period Information
Time Period of Content
Title
Transfer Size
Turnaround
Use Constraints
Vertical Positional Accuracy
Vertical Positional Accuracy Explanation
Vertical Positional Accuracy Report
Vertical Positional Accuracy Value
West Bounding Coordinate
Appendix C: Recommended Ordering of Compound and Data Elements
Appendix D: Glossary for Selected Domain Values