PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 1 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure official poverty Cumulative Cumulative poor1 Frequency Percent Frequency Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ 0 247,365 88.7 247,365 88.7 1 31,576 11.3 278,941 100.0 msi-cpi-ga Cumulative Cumulative poor2 Frequency Percent Frequency Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ 0 245,663 88.1 245,663 88.1 1 33,278 11.9 278,941 100.0 mit-cpi-ga Cumulative Cumulative poor3 Frequency Percent Frequency Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ 0 244,317 87.6 244,317 87.6 1 34,624 12.4 278,941 100.0 cmb-cpi-ga Cumulative Cumulative poor4 Frequency Percent Frequency Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ 0 243,881 87.4 243,881 87.4 1 35,060 12.6 278,941 100.0 msi-cpi-nga Cumulative Cumulative poor5 Frequency Percent Frequency Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ 0 245,249 87.9 245,249 87.9 1 33,692 12.1 278,941 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 2 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure mit-cpi-nga Cumulative Cumulative poor6 Frequency Percent Frequency Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ 0 243,831 87.4 243,831 87.4 1 35,110 12.6 278,941 100.0 cmb-cpi-nga Cumulative Cumulative poor7 Frequency Percent Frequency Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ 0 243,368 87.2 243,368 87.2 1 35,573 12.8 278,941 100.0 msi-ce-ga Cumulative Cumulative poor8 Frequency Percent Frequency Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ 0 244,684 87.7 244,684 87.7 1 34,257 12.3 278,941 100.0 mit-ce-ga Cumulative Cumulative poor9 Frequency Percent Frequency Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ 0 243,491 87.3 243,491 87.3 1 35,450 12.7 278,941 100.0 cmb-ce-ga Cumulative Cumulative poor10 Frequency Percent Frequency Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ 0 243,328 87.2 243,328 87.2 1 35,613 12.8 278,941 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 3 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure msi-ce-nga Cumulative Cumulative poor11 Frequency Percent Frequency Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ 0 244,286 87.6 244,286 87.6 1 34,655 12.4 278,941 100.0 mit-ce-nga Cumulative Cumulative poor12 Frequency Percent Frequency Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ 0 243,071 87.1 243,071 87.1 1 35,870 12.9 278,941 100.0 cmb-ce-nga Cumulative Cumulative poor13 Frequency Percent Frequency Percent ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ 0 242,902 87.1 242,902 87.1 1 36,039 12.9 278,941 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 4 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table of poor1 by agecat poor1(official poverty) agecat Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚18 to 64 ‚65 year o‚Under 18 ‚ Total ‚years ‚ld and ov‚years ‚ ‚ ‚er ‚ ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 156,967 ‚ 30,243 ‚ 60,155 ‚ 247,365 ‚ 56.3 ‚ 10.8 ‚ 21.6 ‚ 88.7 ‚ 63.5 ‚ 12.2 ‚ 24.3 ‚ ‚ 90.4 ‚ 90.1 ‚ 83.9 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 16,671 ‚ 3,323 ‚ 11,582 ‚ 31,576 ‚ 6.0 ‚ 1.2 ‚ 4.2 ‚ 11.3 ‚ 52.8 ‚ 10.5 ‚ 36.7 ‚ ‚ 9.6 ‚ 9.9 ‚ 16.1 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 173,638 33,566 71,737 278,941 62.2 12.0 25.7 100.0 Table of poor2 by agecat poor2(msi-cpi-ga) agecat Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚18 to 64 ‚65 year o‚Under 18 ‚ Total ‚years ‚ld and ov‚years ‚ ‚ ‚er ‚ ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 155,763 ‚ 28,226 ‚ 61,674 ‚ 245,663 ‚ 55.8 ‚ 10.1 ‚ 22.1 ‚ 88.1 ‚ 63.4 ‚ 11.5 ‚ 25.1 ‚ ‚ 89.7 ‚ 84.1 ‚ 86.0 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 17,875 ‚ 5,339 ‚ 10,063 ‚ 33,278 ‚ 6.4 ‚ 1.9 ‚ 3.6 ‚ 11.9 ‚ 53.7 ‚ 16.0 ‚ 30.2 ‚ ‚ 10.3 ‚ 15.9 ‚ 14.0 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 173,638 33,566 71,737 278,941 62.2 12.0 25.7 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 5 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table of poor3 by agecat poor3(mit-cpi-ga) agecat Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚18 to 64 ‚65 year o‚Under 18 ‚ Total ‚years ‚ld and ov‚years ‚ ‚ ‚er ‚ ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 154,653 ‚ 29,019 ‚ 60,645 ‚ 244,317 ‚ 55.4 ‚ 10.4 ‚ 21.7 ‚ 87.6 ‚ 63.3 ‚ 11.9 ‚ 24.8 ‚ ‚ 89.1 ‚ 86.5 ‚ 84.5 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 18,985 ‚ 4,547 ‚ 11,092 ‚ 34,624 ‚ 6.8 ‚ 1.6 ‚ 4.0 ‚ 12.4 ‚ 54.8 ‚ 13.1 ‚ 32.0 ‚ ‚ 10.9 ‚ 13.5 ‚ 15.5 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 173,638 33,566 71,737 278,941 62.2 12.0 25.7 100.0 Table of poor4 by agecat poor4(cmb-cpi-ga) agecat Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚18 to 64 ‚65 year o‚Under 18 ‚ Total ‚years ‚ld and ov‚years ‚ ‚ ‚er ‚ ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 154,850 ‚ 27,958 ‚ 61,074 ‚ 243,881 ‚ 55.5 ‚ 10.0 ‚ 21.9 ‚ 87.4 ‚ 63.5 ‚ 11.5 ‚ 25.0 ‚ ‚ 89.2 ‚ 83.3 ‚ 85.1 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 18,788 ‚ 5,608 ‚ 10,664 ‚ 35,060 ‚ 6.7 ‚ 2.0 ‚ 3.8 ‚ 12.6 ‚ 53.6 ‚ 16.0 ‚ 30.4 ‚ ‚ 10.8 ‚ 16.7 ‚ 14.9 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 173,638 33,566 71,737 278,941 62.2 12.0 25.7 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 6 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table of poor5 by agecat poor5(msi-cpi-nga) agecat Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚18 to 64 ‚65 year o‚Under 18 ‚ Total ‚years ‚ld and ov‚years ‚ ‚ ‚er ‚ ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 155,584 ‚ 28,033 ‚ 61,632 ‚ 245,249 ‚ 55.8 ‚ 10.0 ‚ 22.1 ‚ 87.9 ‚ 63.4 ‚ 11.4 ‚ 25.1 ‚ ‚ 89.6 ‚ 83.5 ‚ 85.9 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 18,054 ‚ 5,532 ‚ 10,106 ‚ 33,692 ‚ 6.5 ‚ 2.0 ‚ 3.6 ‚ 12.1 ‚ 53.6 ‚ 16.4 ‚ 30.0 ‚ ‚ 10.4 ‚ 16.5 ‚ 14.1 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 173,638 33,566 71,737 278,941 62.2 12.0 25.7 100.0 Table of poor6 by agecat poor6(mit-cpi-nga) agecat Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚18 to 64 ‚65 year o‚Under 18 ‚ Total ‚years ‚ld and ov‚years ‚ ‚ ‚er ‚ ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 154,383 ‚ 28,844 ‚ 60,603 ‚ 243,831 ‚ 55.3 ‚ 10.3 ‚ 21.7 ‚ 87.4 ‚ 63.3 ‚ 11.8 ‚ 24.9 ‚ ‚ 88.9 ‚ 85.9 ‚ 84.5 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 19,255 ‚ 4,721 ‚ 11,134 ‚ 35,110 ‚ 6.9 ‚ 1.7 ‚ 4.0 ‚ 12.6 ‚ 54.8 ‚ 13.4 ‚ 31.7 ‚ ‚ 11.1 ‚ 14.1 ‚ 15.5 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 173,638 33,566 71,737 278,941 62.2 12.0 25.7 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 7 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table of poor7 by agecat poor7(cmb-cpi-nga) agecat Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚18 to 64 ‚65 year o‚Under 18 ‚ Total ‚years ‚ld and ov‚years ‚ ‚ ‚er ‚ ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 154,621 ‚ 27,708 ‚ 61,039 ‚ 243,368 ‚ 55.4 ‚ 9.9 ‚ 21.9 ‚ 87.2 ‚ 63.5 ‚ 11.4 ‚ 25.1 ‚ ‚ 89.0 ‚ 82.5 ‚ 85.1 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 19,017 ‚ 5,858 ‚ 10,699 ‚ 35,573 ‚ 6.8 ‚ 2.1 ‚ 3.8 ‚ 12.8 ‚ 53.5 ‚ 16.5 ‚ 30.1 ‚ ‚ 11.0 ‚ 17.5 ‚ 14.9 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 173,638 33,566 71,737 278,941 62.2 12.0 25.7 100.0 Table of poor8 by agecat poor8(msi-ce-ga) agecat Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚18 to 64 ‚65 year o‚Under 18 ‚ Total ‚years ‚ld and ov‚years ‚ ‚ ‚er ‚ ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 155,277 ‚ 28,053 ‚ 61,355 ‚ 244,684 ‚ 55.7 ‚ 10.1 ‚ 22.0 ‚ 87.7 ‚ 63.5 ‚ 11.5 ‚ 25.1 ‚ ‚ 89.4 ‚ 83.6 ‚ 85.5 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 18,361 ‚ 5,513 ‚ 10,383 ‚ 34,257 ‚ 6.6 ‚ 2.0 ‚ 3.7 ‚ 12.3 ‚ 53.6 ‚ 16.1 ‚ 30.3 ‚ ‚ 10.6 ‚ 16.4 ‚ 14.5 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 173,638 33,566 71,737 278,941 62.2 12.0 25.7 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 8 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table of poor9 by agecat poor9(mit-ce-ga) agecat Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚18 to 64 ‚65 year o‚Under 18 ‚ Total ‚years ‚ld and ov‚years ‚ ‚ ‚er ‚ ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 154,236 ‚ 28,824 ‚ 60,431 ‚ 243,491 ‚ 55.3 ‚ 10.3 ‚ 21.7 ‚ 87.3 ‚ 63.3 ‚ 11.8 ‚ 24.8 ‚ ‚ 88.8 ‚ 85.9 ‚ 84.2 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 19,402 ‚ 4,741 ‚ 11,307 ‚ 35,450 ‚ 7.0 ‚ 1.7 ‚ 4.1 ‚ 12.7 ‚ 54.7 ‚ 13.4 ‚ 31.9 ‚ ‚ 11.2 ‚ 14.1 ‚ 15.8 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 173,638 33,566 71,737 278,941 62.2 12.0 25.7 100.0 Table of poor10 by agecat poor10(cmb-ce-ga) agecat Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚18 to 64 ‚65 year o‚Under 18 ‚ Total ‚years ‚ld and ov‚years ‚ ‚ ‚er ‚ ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 154,573 ‚ 27,847 ‚ 60,908 ‚ 243,328 ‚ 55.4 ‚ 10.0 ‚ 21.8 ‚ 87.2 ‚ 63.5 ‚ 11.4 ‚ 25.0 ‚ ‚ 89.0 ‚ 83.0 ‚ 84.9 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 19,065 ‚ 5,718 ‚ 10,830 ‚ 35,613 ‚ 6.8 ‚ 2.0 ‚ 3.9 ‚ 12.8 ‚ 53.5 ‚ 16.1 ‚ 30.4 ‚ ‚ 11.0 ‚ 17.0 ‚ 15.1 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 173,638 33,566 71,737 278,941 62.2 12.0 25.7 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 9 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table of poor11 by agecat poor11(msi-ce-nga) agecat Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚18 to 64 ‚65 year o‚Under 18 ‚ Total ‚years ‚ld and ov‚years ‚ ‚ ‚er ‚ ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 155,089 ‚ 27,844 ‚ 61,353 ‚ 244,286 ‚ 55.6 ‚ 10.0 ‚ 22.0 ‚ 87.6 ‚ 63.5 ‚ 11.4 ‚ 25.1 ‚ ‚ 89.3 ‚ 83.0 ‚ 85.5 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 18,549 ‚ 5,722 ‚ 10,385 ‚ 34,655 ‚ 6.6 ‚ 2.1 ‚ 3.7 ‚ 12.4 ‚ 53.5 ‚ 16.5 ‚ 30.0 ‚ ‚ 10.7 ‚ 17.0 ‚ 14.5 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 173,638 33,566 71,737 278,941 62.2 12.0 25.7 100.0 Table of poor12 by agecat poor12(mit-ce-nga) agecat Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚18 to 64 ‚65 year o‚Under 18 ‚ Total ‚years ‚ld and ov‚years ‚ ‚ ‚er ‚ ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 154,044 ‚ 28,601 ‚ 60,425 ‚ 243,071 ‚ 55.2 ‚ 10.3 ‚ 21.7 ‚ 87.1 ‚ 63.4 ‚ 11.8 ‚ 24.9 ‚ ‚ 88.7 ‚ 85.2 ‚ 84.2 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 19,593 ‚ 4,964 ‚ 11,313 ‚ 35,870 ‚ 7.0 ‚ 1.8 ‚ 4.1 ‚ 12.9 ‚ 54.6 ‚ 13.8 ‚ 31.5 ‚ ‚ 11.3 ‚ 14.8 ‚ 15.8 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 173,638 33,566 71,737 278,941 62.2 12.0 25.7 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 10 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table of poor13 by agecat poor13(cmb-ce-nga) agecat Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚18 to 64 ‚65 year o‚Under 18 ‚ Total ‚years ‚ld and ov‚years ‚ ‚ ‚er ‚ ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 154,368 ‚ 27,626 ‚ 60,908 ‚ 242,902 ‚ 55.3 ‚ 9.9 ‚ 21.8 ‚ 87.1 ‚ 63.6 ‚ 11.4 ‚ 25.1 ‚ ‚ 88.9 ‚ 82.3 ‚ 84.9 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 19,269 ‚ 5,940 ‚ 10,830 ‚ 36,039 ‚ 6.9 ‚ 2.1 ‚ 3.9 ‚ 12.9 ‚ 53.5 ‚ 16.5 ‚ 30.0 ‚ ‚ 11.1 ‚ 17.7 ‚ 15.1 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 173,638 33,566 71,737 278,941 62.2 12.0 25.7 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 11 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table of poor1 by adwk poor1(official poverty) adwk Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚No worker‚One or mo‚ Total ‚s present‚re worker‚ ‚ in famil‚s present‚ ‚y ‚ in famil‚ ‚ ‚y ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 24,874 ‚ 222,490 ‚ 247,365 ‚ 8.9 ‚ 79.8 ‚ 88.7 ‚ 10.1 ‚ 89.9 ‚ ‚ 66.7 ‚ 92.1 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 12,404 ‚ 19,172 ‚ 31,576 ‚ 4.4 ‚ 6.9 ‚ 11.3 ‚ 39.3 ‚ 60.7 ‚ ‚ 33.3 ‚ 7.9 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 37,279 241,662 278,941 13.4 86.6 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 12 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table of poor2 by adwk poor2(msi-cpi-ga) adwk Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚No worker‚One or mo‚ Total ‚s present‚re worker‚ ‚ in famil‚s present‚ ‚y ‚ in famil‚ ‚ ‚y ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 24,223 ‚ 221,440 ‚ 245,663 ‚ 8.7 ‚ 79.4 ‚ 88.1 ‚ 9.9 ‚ 90.1 ‚ ‚ 65.0 ‚ 91.6 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 13,056 ‚ 20,222 ‚ 33,278 ‚ 4.7 ‚ 7.2 ‚ 11.9 ‚ 39.2 ‚ 60.8 ‚ ‚ 35.0 ‚ 8.4 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 37,279 241,662 278,941 13.4 86.6 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 13 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table of poor3 by adwk poor3(mit-cpi-ga) adwk Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚No worker‚One or mo‚ Total ‚s present‚re worker‚ ‚ in famil‚s present‚ ‚y ‚ in famil‚ ‚ ‚y ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 24,831 ‚ 219,486 ‚ 244,317 ‚ 8.9 ‚ 78.7 ‚ 87.6 ‚ 10.2 ‚ 89.8 ‚ ‚ 66.6 ‚ 90.8 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 12,448 ‚ 22,175 ‚ 34,624 ‚ 4.5 ‚ 7.9 ‚ 12.4 ‚ 36.0 ‚ 64.0 ‚ ‚ 33.4 ‚ 9.2 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 37,279 241,662 278,941 13.4 86.6 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 14 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table of poor4 by adwk poor4(cmb-cpi-ga) adwk Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚No worker‚One or mo‚ Total ‚s present‚re worker‚ ‚ in famil‚s present‚ ‚y ‚ in famil‚ ‚ ‚y ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 23,769 ‚ 220,112 ‚ 243,881 ‚ 8.5 ‚ 78.9 ‚ 87.4 ‚ 9.7 ‚ 90.3 ‚ ‚ 63.8 ‚ 91.1 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 13,509 ‚ 21,550 ‚ 35,060 ‚ 4.8 ‚ 7.7 ‚ 12.6 ‚ 38.5 ‚ 61.5 ‚ ‚ 36.2 ‚ 8.9 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 37,279 241,662 278,941 13.4 86.6 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 15 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table of poor5 by adwk poor5(msi-cpi-nga) adwk Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚No worker‚One or mo‚ Total ‚s present‚re worker‚ ‚ in famil‚s present‚ ‚y ‚ in famil‚ ‚ ‚y ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 23,980 ‚ 221,269 ‚ 245,249 ‚ 8.6 ‚ 79.3 ‚ 87.9 ‚ 9.8 ‚ 90.2 ‚ ‚ 64.3 ‚ 91.6 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 13,298 ‚ 20,393 ‚ 33,692 ‚ 4.8 ‚ 7.3 ‚ 12.1 ‚ 39.5 ‚ 60.5 ‚ ‚ 35.7 ‚ 8.4 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 37,279 241,662 278,941 13.4 86.6 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 16 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table of poor6 by adwk poor6(mit-cpi-nga) adwk Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚No worker‚One or mo‚ Total ‚s present‚re worker‚ ‚ in famil‚s present‚ ‚y ‚ in famil‚ ‚ ‚y ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 24,470 ‚ 219,361 ‚ 243,831 ‚ 8.8 ‚ 78.6 ‚ 87.4 ‚ 10.0 ‚ 90.0 ‚ ‚ 65.6 ‚ 90.8 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 12,809 ‚ 22,301 ‚ 35,110 ‚ 4.6 ‚ 8.0 ‚ 12.6 ‚ 36.5 ‚ 63.5 ‚ ‚ 34.4 ‚ 9.2 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 37,279 241,662 278,941 13.4 86.6 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 17 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table of poor7 by adwk poor7(cmb-cpi-nga) adwk Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚No worker‚One or mo‚ Total ‚s present‚re worker‚ ‚ in famil‚s present‚ ‚y ‚ in famil‚ ‚ ‚y ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 23,405 ‚ 219,963 ‚ 243,368 ‚ 8.4 ‚ 78.9 ‚ 87.2 ‚ 9.6 ‚ 90.4 ‚ ‚ 62.8 ‚ 91.0 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 13,874 ‚ 21,699 ‚ 35,573 ‚ 5.0 ‚ 7.8 ‚ 12.8 ‚ 39.0 ‚ 61.0 ‚ ‚ 37.2 ‚ 9.0 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 37,279 241,662 278,941 13.4 86.6 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 18 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table of poor8 by adwk poor8(msi-ce-ga) adwk Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚No worker‚One or mo‚ Total ‚s present‚re worker‚ ‚ in famil‚s present‚ ‚y ‚ in famil‚ ‚ ‚y ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 23,998 ‚ 220,686 ‚ 244,684 ‚ 8.6 ‚ 79.1 ‚ 87.7 ‚ 9.8 ‚ 90.2 ‚ ‚ 64.4 ‚ 91.3 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 13,281 ‚ 20,976 ‚ 34,257 ‚ 4.8 ‚ 7.5 ‚ 12.3 ‚ 38.8 ‚ 61.2 ‚ ‚ 35.6 ‚ 8.7 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 37,279 241,662 278,941 13.4 86.6 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 19 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table of poor9 by adwk poor9(mit-ce-ga) adwk Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚No worker‚One or mo‚ Total ‚s present‚re worker‚ ‚ in famil‚s present‚ ‚y ‚ in famil‚ ‚ ‚y ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 24,608 ‚ 218,883 ‚ 243,491 ‚ 8.8 ‚ 78.5 ‚ 87.3 ‚ 10.1 ‚ 89.9 ‚ ‚ 66.0 ‚ 90.6 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 12,671 ‚ 22,779 ‚ 35,450 ‚ 4.5 ‚ 8.2 ‚ 12.7 ‚ 35.7 ‚ 64.3 ‚ ‚ 34.0 ‚ 9.4 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 37,279 241,662 278,941 13.4 86.6 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 20 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table of poor10 by adwk poor10(cmb-ce-ga) adwk Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚No worker‚One or mo‚ Total ‚s present‚re worker‚ ‚ in famil‚s present‚ ‚y ‚ in famil‚ ‚ ‚y ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 23,638 ‚ 219,690 ‚ 243,328 ‚ 8.5 ‚ 78.8 ‚ 87.2 ‚ 9.7 ‚ 90.3 ‚ ‚ 63.4 ‚ 90.9 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 13,640 ‚ 21,972 ‚ 35,613 ‚ 4.9 ‚ 7.9 ‚ 12.8 ‚ 38.3 ‚ 61.7 ‚ ‚ 36.6 ‚ 9.1 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 37,279 241,662 278,941 13.4 86.6 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 21 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table of poor11 by adwk poor11(msi-ce-nga) adwk Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚No worker‚One or mo‚ Total ‚s present‚re worker‚ ‚ in famil‚s present‚ ‚y ‚ in famil‚ ‚ ‚y ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 23,686 ‚ 220,599 ‚ 244,286 ‚ 8.5 ‚ 79.1 ‚ 87.6 ‚ 9.7 ‚ 90.3 ‚ ‚ 63.5 ‚ 91.3 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 13,592 ‚ 21,063 ‚ 34,655 ‚ 4.9 ‚ 7.6 ‚ 12.4 ‚ 39.2 ‚ 60.8 ‚ ‚ 36.5 ‚ 8.7 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 37,279 241,662 278,941 13.4 86.6 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 22 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table of poor12 by adwk poor12(mit-ce-nga) adwk Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚No worker‚One or mo‚ Total ‚s present‚re worker‚ ‚ in famil‚s present‚ ‚y ‚ in famil‚ ‚ ‚y ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 24,205 ‚ 218,865 ‚ 243,071 ‚ 8.7 ‚ 78.5 ‚ 87.1 ‚ 10.0 ‚ 90.0 ‚ ‚ 64.9 ‚ 90.6 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 13,073 ‚ 22,797 ‚ 35,870 ‚ 4.7 ‚ 8.2 ‚ 12.9 ‚ 36.4 ‚ 63.6 ‚ ‚ 35.1 ‚ 9.4 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 37,279 241,662 278,941 13.4 86.6 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 23 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table of poor13 by adwk poor13(cmb-ce-nga) adwk Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚No worker‚One or mo‚ Total ‚s present‚re worker‚ ‚ in famil‚s present‚ ‚y ‚ in famil‚ ‚ ‚y ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 23,289 ‚ 219,613 ‚ 242,902 ‚ 8.3 ‚ 78.7 ‚ 87.1 ‚ 9.6 ‚ 90.4 ‚ ‚ 62.5 ‚ 90.9 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 13,990 ‚ 22,049 ‚ 36,039 ‚ 5.0 ‚ 7.9 ‚ 12.9 ‚ 38.8 ‚ 61.2 ‚ ‚ 37.5 ‚ 9.1 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 37,279 241,662 278,941 13.4 86.6 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 24 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table of poor1 by a_race poor1(official poverty) a_race(Person Race) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚White ‚Black ‚American ‚Asian or ‚ Total ‚ ‚ ‚Indian or‚Pacific I‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ Alaska N‚slander ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ative ‚ ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 206,203 ‚ 27,443 ‚ 2,305 ‚ 11,414 ‚ 247,365 ‚ 73.9 ‚ 9.8 ‚ 0.8 ‚ 4.1 ‚ 88.7 ‚ 83.4 ‚ 11.1 ‚ 0.9 ‚ 4.6 ‚ ‚ 90.5 ‚ 77.5 ‚ 76.8 ‚ 90.1 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 21,642 ‚ 7,981 ‚ 696 ‚ 1,258 ‚ 31,576 ‚ 7.8 ‚ 2.9 ‚ 0.2 ‚ 0.5 ‚ 11.3 ‚ 68.5 ‚ 25.3 ‚ 2.2 ‚ 4.0 ‚ ‚ 9.5 ‚ 22.5 ‚ 23.2 ‚ 9.9 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 227,844 35,423 3,001 12,672 278,941 81.7 12.7 1.1 4.5 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 25 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table of poor2 by a_race poor2(msi-cpi-ga) a_race(Person Race) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚White ‚Black ‚American ‚Asian or ‚ Total ‚ ‚ ‚Indian or‚Pacific I‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ Alaska N‚slander ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ative ‚ ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 203,931 ‚ 28,248 ‚ 2,395 ‚ 11,089 ‚ 245,663 ‚ 73.1 ‚ 10.1 ‚ 0.9 ‚ 4.0 ‚ 88.1 ‚ 83.0 ‚ 11.5 ‚ 1.0 ‚ 4.5 ‚ ‚ 89.5 ‚ 79.7 ‚ 79.8 ‚ 87.5 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 23,913 ‚ 7,176 ‚ 605 ‚ 1,583 ‚ 33,278 ‚ 8.6 ‚ 2.6 ‚ 0.2 ‚ 0.6 ‚ 11.9 ‚ 71.9 ‚ 21.6 ‚ 1.8 ‚ 4.8 ‚ ‚ 10.5 ‚ 20.3 ‚ 20.2 ‚ 12.5 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 227,844 35,423 3,001 12,672 278,941 81.7 12.7 1.1 4.5 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 26 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table of poor3 by a_race poor3(mit-cpi-ga) a_race(Person Race) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚White ‚Black ‚American ‚Asian or ‚ Total ‚ ‚ ‚Indian or‚Pacific I‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ Alaska N‚slander ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ative ‚ ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 203,040 ‚ 27,855 ‚ 2,365 ‚ 11,056 ‚ 244,317 ‚ 72.8 ‚ 10.0 ‚ 0.8 ‚ 4.0 ‚ 87.6 ‚ 83.1 ‚ 11.4 ‚ 1.0 ‚ 4.5 ‚ ‚ 89.1 ‚ 78.6 ‚ 78.8 ‚ 87.2 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 24,804 ‚ 7,568 ‚ 635 ‚ 1,616 ‚ 34,624 ‚ 8.9 ‚ 2.7 ‚ 0.2 ‚ 0.6 ‚ 12.4 ‚ 71.6 ‚ 21.9 ‚ 1.8 ‚ 4.7 ‚ ‚ 10.9 ‚ 21.4 ‚ 21.2 ‚ 12.8 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 227,844 35,423 3,001 12,672 278,941 81.7 12.7 1.1 4.5 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 27 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table of poor4 by a_race poor4(cmb-cpi-ga) a_race(Person Race) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚White ‚Black ‚American ‚Asian or ‚ Total ‚ ‚ ‚Indian or‚Pacific I‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ Alaska N‚slander ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ative ‚ ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 202,706 ‚ 27,786 ‚ 2,356 ‚ 11,034 ‚ 243,881 ‚ 72.7 ‚ 10.0 ‚ 0.8 ‚ 4.0 ‚ 87.4 ‚ 83.1 ‚ 11.4 ‚ 1.0 ‚ 4.5 ‚ ‚ 89.0 ‚ 78.4 ‚ 78.5 ‚ 87.1 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 25,138 ‚ 7,638 ‚ 645 ‚ 1,639 ‚ 35,060 ‚ 9.0 ‚ 2.7 ‚ 0.2 ‚ 0.6 ‚ 12.6 ‚ 71.7 ‚ 21.8 ‚ 1.8 ‚ 4.7 ‚ ‚ 11.0 ‚ 21.6 ‚ 21.5 ‚ 12.9 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 227,844 35,423 3,001 12,672 278,941 81.7 12.7 1.1 4.5 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 28 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table of poor5 by a_race poor5(msi-cpi-nga) a_race(Person Race) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚White ‚Black ‚American ‚Asian or ‚ Total ‚ ‚ ‚Indian or‚Pacific I‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ Alaska N‚slander ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ative ‚ ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 203,612 ‚ 27,915 ‚ 2,311 ‚ 11,411 ‚ 245,249 ‚ 73.0 ‚ 10.0 ‚ 0.8 ‚ 4.1 ‚ 87.9 ‚ 83.0 ‚ 11.4 ‚ 0.9 ‚ 4.7 ‚ ‚ 89.4 ‚ 78.8 ‚ 77.0 ‚ 90.0 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 24,232 ‚ 7,508 ‚ 690 ‚ 1,261 ‚ 33,692 ‚ 8.7 ‚ 2.7 ‚ 0.2 ‚ 0.5 ‚ 12.1 ‚ 71.9 ‚ 22.3 ‚ 2.0 ‚ 3.7 ‚ ‚ 10.6 ‚ 21.2 ‚ 23.0 ‚ 10.0 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 227,844 35,423 3,001 12,672 278,941 81.7 12.7 1.1 4.5 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 29 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table of poor6 by a_race poor6(mit-cpi-nga) a_race(Person Race) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚White ‚Black ‚American ‚Asian or ‚ Total ‚ ‚ ‚Indian or‚Pacific I‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ Alaska N‚slander ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ative ‚ ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 202,721 ‚ 27,550 ‚ 2,265 ‚ 11,294 ‚ 243,831 ‚ 72.7 ‚ 9.9 ‚ 0.8 ‚ 4.0 ‚ 87.4 ‚ 83.1 ‚ 11.3 ‚ 0.9 ‚ 4.6 ‚ ‚ 89.0 ‚ 77.8 ‚ 75.5 ‚ 89.1 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 25,123 ‚ 7,873 ‚ 735 ‚ 1,379 ‚ 35,110 ‚ 9.0 ‚ 2.8 ‚ 0.3 ‚ 0.5 ‚ 12.6 ‚ 71.6 ‚ 22.4 ‚ 2.1 ‚ 3.9 ‚ ‚ 11.0 ‚ 22.2 ‚ 24.5 ‚ 10.9 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 227,844 35,423 3,001 12,672 278,941 81.7 12.7 1.1 4.5 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 30 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table of poor7 by a_race poor7(cmb-cpi-nga) a_race(Person Race) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚White ‚Black ‚American ‚Asian or ‚ Total ‚ ‚ ‚Indian or‚Pacific I‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ Alaska N‚slander ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ative ‚ ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 202,262 ‚ 27,487 ‚ 2,278 ‚ 11,340 ‚ 243,368 ‚ 72.5 ‚ 9.9 ‚ 0.8 ‚ 4.1 ‚ 87.2 ‚ 83.1 ‚ 11.3 ‚ 0.9 ‚ 4.7 ‚ ‚ 88.8 ‚ 77.6 ‚ 75.9 ‚ 89.5 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 25,582 ‚ 7,936 ‚ 723 ‚ 1,332 ‚ 35,573 ‚ 9.2 ‚ 2.8 ‚ 0.3 ‚ 0.5 ‚ 12.8 ‚ 71.9 ‚ 22.3 ‚ 2.0 ‚ 3.7 ‚ ‚ 11.2 ‚ 22.4 ‚ 24.1 ‚ 10.5 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 227,844 35,423 3,001 12,672 278,941 81.7 12.7 1.1 4.5 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 31 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table of poor8 by a_race poor8(msi-ce-ga) a_race(Person Race) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚White ‚Black ‚American ‚Asian or ‚ Total ‚ ‚ ‚Indian or‚Pacific I‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ Alaska N‚slander ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ative ‚ ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 203,262 ‚ 27,982 ‚ 2,371 ‚ 11,068 ‚ 244,684 ‚ 72.9 ‚ 10.0 ‚ 0.9 ‚ 4.0 ‚ 87.7 ‚ 83.1 ‚ 11.4 ‚ 1.0 ‚ 4.5 ‚ ‚ 89.2 ‚ 79.0 ‚ 79.0 ‚ 87.3 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 24,582 ‚ 7,441 ‚ 630 ‚ 1,604 ‚ 34,257 ‚ 8.8 ‚ 2.7 ‚ 0.2 ‚ 0.6 ‚ 12.3 ‚ 71.8 ‚ 21.7 ‚ 1.8 ‚ 4.7 ‚ ‚ 10.8 ‚ 21.0 ‚ 21.0 ‚ 12.7 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 227,844 35,423 3,001 12,672 278,941 81.7 12.7 1.1 4.5 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 32 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table of poor9 by a_race poor9(mit-ce-ga) a_race(Person Race) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚White ‚Black ‚American ‚Asian or ‚ Total ‚ ‚ ‚Indian or‚Pacific I‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ Alaska N‚slander ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ative ‚ ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 202,365 ‚ 27,725 ‚ 2,359 ‚ 11,042 ‚ 243,491 ‚ 72.5 ‚ 9.9 ‚ 0.8 ‚ 4.0 ‚ 87.3 ‚ 83.1 ‚ 11.4 ‚ 1.0 ‚ 4.5 ‚ ‚ 88.8 ‚ 78.3 ‚ 78.6 ‚ 87.1 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 25,479 ‚ 7,698 ‚ 642 ‚ 1,630 ‚ 35,450 ‚ 9.1 ‚ 2.8 ‚ 0.2 ‚ 0.6 ‚ 12.7 ‚ 71.9 ‚ 21.7 ‚ 1.8 ‚ 4.6 ‚ ‚ 11.2 ‚ 21.7 ‚ 21.4 ‚ 12.9 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 227,844 35,423 3,001 12,672 278,941 81.7 12.7 1.1 4.5 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 33 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table of poor10 by a_race poor10(cmb-ce-ga) a_race(Person Race) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚White ‚Black ‚American ‚Asian or ‚ Total ‚ ‚ ‚Indian or‚Pacific I‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ Alaska N‚slander ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ative ‚ ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 202,258 ‚ 27,700 ‚ 2,351 ‚ 11,020 ‚ 243,328 ‚ 72.5 ‚ 9.9 ‚ 0.8 ‚ 4.0 ‚ 87.2 ‚ 83.1 ‚ 11.4 ‚ 1.0 ‚ 4.5 ‚ ‚ 88.8 ‚ 78.2 ‚ 78.3 ‚ 87.0 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 25,587 ‚ 7,724 ‚ 650 ‚ 1,652 ‚ 35,613 ‚ 9.2 ‚ 2.8 ‚ 0.2 ‚ 0.6 ‚ 12.8 ‚ 71.8 ‚ 21.7 ‚ 1.8 ‚ 4.6 ‚ ‚ 11.2 ‚ 21.8 ‚ 21.7 ‚ 13.0 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 227,844 35,423 3,001 12,672 278,941 81.7 12.7 1.1 4.5 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 34 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table of poor11 by a_race poor11(msi-ce-nga) a_race(Person Race) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚White ‚Black ‚American ‚Asian or ‚ Total ‚ ‚ ‚Indian or‚Pacific I‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ Alaska N‚slander ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ative ‚ ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 202,914 ‚ 27,712 ‚ 2,292 ‚ 11,368 ‚ 244,286 ‚ 72.7 ‚ 9.9 ‚ 0.8 ‚ 4.1 ‚ 87.6 ‚ 83.1 ‚ 11.3 ‚ 0.9 ‚ 4.7 ‚ ‚ 89.1 ‚ 78.2 ‚ 76.4 ‚ 89.7 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 24,930 ‚ 7,711 ‚ 709 ‚ 1,304 ‚ 34,655 ‚ 8.9 ‚ 2.8 ‚ 0.3 ‚ 0.5 ‚ 12.4 ‚ 71.9 ‚ 22.3 ‚ 2.0 ‚ 3.8 ‚ ‚ 10.9 ‚ 21.8 ‚ 23.6 ‚ 10.3 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 227,844 35,423 3,001 12,672 278,941 81.7 12.7 1.1 4.5 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 35 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table of poor12 by a_race poor12(mit-ce-nga) a_race(Person Race) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚White ‚Black ‚American ‚Asian or ‚ Total ‚ ‚ ‚Indian or‚Pacific I‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ Alaska N‚slander ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ative ‚ ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 202,180 ‚ 27,374 ‚ 2,257 ‚ 11,260 ‚ 243,071 ‚ 72.5 ‚ 9.8 ‚ 0.8 ‚ 4.0 ‚ 87.1 ‚ 83.2 ‚ 11.3 ‚ 0.9 ‚ 4.6 ‚ ‚ 88.7 ‚ 77.3 ‚ 75.2 ‚ 88.9 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 25,664 ‚ 8,050 ‚ 744 ‚ 1,412 ‚ 35,870 ‚ 9.2 ‚ 2.9 ‚ 0.3 ‚ 0.5 ‚ 12.9 ‚ 71.5 ‚ 22.4 ‚ 2.1 ‚ 3.9 ‚ ‚ 11.3 ‚ 22.7 ‚ 24.8 ‚ 11.1 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 227,844 35,423 3,001 12,672 278,941 81.7 12.7 1.1 4.5 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 36 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table of poor13 by a_race poor13(cmb-ce-nga) a_race(Person Race) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚White ‚Black ‚American ‚Asian or ‚ Total ‚ ‚ ‚Indian or‚Pacific I‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ Alaska N‚slander ‚ ‚ ‚ ‚ative ‚ ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 201,903 ‚ 27,423 ‚ 2,262 ‚ 11,314 ‚ 242,902 ‚ 72.4 ‚ 9.8 ‚ 0.8 ‚ 4.1 ‚ 87.1 ‚ 83.1 ‚ 11.3 ‚ 0.9 ‚ 4.7 ‚ ‚ 88.6 ‚ 77.4 ‚ 75.4 ‚ 89.3 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 25,941 ‚ 8,001 ‚ 739 ‚ 1,358 ‚ 36,039 ‚ 9.3 ‚ 2.9 ‚ 0.3 ‚ 0.5 ‚ 12.9 ‚ 72.0 ‚ 22.2 ‚ 2.1 ‚ 3.8 ‚ ‚ 11.4 ‚ 22.6 ‚ 24.6 ‚ 10.7 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 227,844 35,423 3,001 12,672 278,941 81.7 12.7 1.1 4.5 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 37 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table of poor1 by hinstat poor1(official poverty) hinstat(Persons Summary Health Insurance Coverage Status) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚Not cover‚Has priva‚Has publi‚ Total ‚ed by hea‚te health‚c health ‚ ‚lth insur‚ insuranc‚insurance‚ ‚ance ‚e coverag‚ coverage‚ ‚ ‚e ‚ ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 30,061 ‚ 192,333 ‚ 24,971 ‚ 247,365 ‚ 10.8 ‚ 69.0 ‚ 9.0 ‚ 88.7 ‚ 12.2 ‚ 77.8 ‚ 10.1 ‚ ‚ 75.9 ‚ 95.7 ‚ 65.0 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 9,546 ‚ 8,573 ‚ 13,457 ‚ 31,576 ‚ 3.4 ‚ 3.1 ‚ 4.8 ‚ 11.3 ‚ 30.2 ‚ 27.2 ‚ 42.6 ‚ ‚ 24.1 ‚ 4.3 ‚ 35.0 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 39,607 200,906 38,428 278,941 14.2 72.0 13.8 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 38 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table of poor2 by hinstat poor2(msi-cpi-ga) hinstat(Persons Summary Health Insurance Coverage Status) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚Not cover‚Has priva‚Has publi‚ Total ‚ed by hea‚te health‚c health ‚ ‚lth insur‚ insuranc‚insurance‚ ‚ance ‚e coverag‚ coverage‚ ‚ ‚e ‚ ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 28,978 ‚ 190,391 ‚ 26,294 ‚ 245,663 ‚ 10.4 ‚ 68.3 ‚ 9.4 ‚ 88.1 ‚ 11.8 ‚ 77.5 ‚ 10.7 ‚ ‚ 73.2 ‚ 94.8 ‚ 68.4 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 10,628 ‚ 10,515 ‚ 12,135 ‚ 33,278 ‚ 3.8 ‚ 3.8 ‚ 4.4 ‚ 11.9 ‚ 31.9 ‚ 31.6 ‚ 36.5 ‚ ‚ 26.8 ‚ 5.2 ‚ 31.6 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 39,607 200,906 38,428 278,941 14.2 72.0 13.8 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 39 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table of poor3 by hinstat poor3(mit-cpi-ga) hinstat(Persons Summary Health Insurance Coverage Status) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚Not cover‚Has priva‚Has publi‚ Total ‚ed by hea‚te health‚c health ‚ ‚lth insur‚ insuranc‚insurance‚ ‚ance ‚e coverag‚ coverage‚ ‚ ‚e ‚ ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 28,205 ‚ 189,455 ‚ 26,657 ‚ 244,317 ‚ 10.1 ‚ 67.9 ‚ 9.6 ‚ 87.6 ‚ 11.5 ‚ 77.5 ‚ 10.9 ‚ ‚ 71.2 ‚ 94.3 ‚ 69.4 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 11,402 ‚ 11,451 ‚ 11,771 ‚ 34,624 ‚ 4.1 ‚ 4.1 ‚ 4.2 ‚ 12.4 ‚ 32.9 ‚ 33.1 ‚ 34.0 ‚ ‚ 28.8 ‚ 5.7 ‚ 30.6 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 39,607 200,906 38,428 278,941 14.2 72.0 13.8 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 40 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table of poor4 by hinstat poor4(cmb-cpi-ga) hinstat(Persons Summary Health Insurance Coverage Status) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚Not cover‚Has priva‚Has publi‚ Total ‚ed by hea‚te health‚c health ‚ ‚lth insur‚ insuranc‚insurance‚ ‚ance ‚e coverag‚ coverage‚ ‚ ‚e ‚ ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 28,565 ‚ 189,643 ‚ 25,673 ‚ 243,881 ‚ 10.2 ‚ 68.0 ‚ 9.2 ‚ 87.4 ‚ 11.7 ‚ 77.8 ‚ 10.5 ‚ ‚ 72.1 ‚ 94.4 ‚ 66.8 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 11,041 ‚ 11,263 ‚ 12,756 ‚ 35,060 ‚ 4.0 ‚ 4.0 ‚ 4.6 ‚ 12.6 ‚ 31.5 ‚ 32.1 ‚ 36.4 ‚ ‚ 27.9 ‚ 5.6 ‚ 33.2 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 39,607 200,906 38,428 278,941 14.2 72.0 13.8 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 41 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table of poor5 by hinstat poor5(msi-cpi-nga) hinstat(Persons Summary Health Insurance Coverage Status) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚Not cover‚Has priva‚Has publi‚ Total ‚ed by hea‚te health‚c health ‚ ‚lth insur‚ insuranc‚insurance‚ ‚ance ‚e coverag‚ coverage‚ ‚ ‚e ‚ ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 28,934 ‚ 190,234 ‚ 26,081 ‚ 245,249 ‚ 10.4 ‚ 68.2 ‚ 9.4 ‚ 87.9 ‚ 11.8 ‚ 77.6 ‚ 10.6 ‚ ‚ 73.1 ‚ 94.7 ‚ 67.9 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 10,673 ‚ 10,672 ‚ 12,347 ‚ 33,692 ‚ 3.8 ‚ 3.8 ‚ 4.4 ‚ 12.1 ‚ 31.7 ‚ 31.7 ‚ 36.6 ‚ ‚ 26.9 ‚ 5.3 ‚ 32.1 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 39,607 200,906 38,428 278,941 14.2 72.0 13.8 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 42 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table of poor6 by hinstat poor6(mit-cpi-nga) hinstat(Persons Summary Health Insurance Coverage Status) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚Not cover‚Has priva‚Has publi‚ Total ‚ed by hea‚te health‚c health ‚ ‚lth insur‚ insuranc‚insurance‚ ‚ance ‚e coverag‚ coverage‚ ‚ ‚e ‚ ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 28,215 ‚ 189,292 ‚ 26,324 ‚ 243,831 ‚ 10.1 ‚ 67.9 ‚ 9.4 ‚ 87.4 ‚ 11.6 ‚ 77.6 ‚ 10.8 ‚ ‚ 71.2 ‚ 94.2 ‚ 68.5 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 11,392 ‚ 11,614 ‚ 12,104 ‚ 35,110 ‚ 4.1 ‚ 4.2 ‚ 4.3 ‚ 12.6 ‚ 32.4 ‚ 33.1 ‚ 34.5 ‚ ‚ 28.8 ‚ 5.8 ‚ 31.5 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 39,607 200,906 38,428 278,941 14.2 72.0 13.8 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 43 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table of poor7 by hinstat poor7(cmb-cpi-nga) hinstat(Persons Summary Health Insurance Coverage Status) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚Not cover‚Has priva‚Has publi‚ Total ‚ed by hea‚te health‚c health ‚ ‚lth insur‚ insuranc‚insurance‚ ‚ance ‚e coverag‚ coverage‚ ‚ ‚e ‚ ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 28,549 ‚ 189,526 ‚ 25,293 ‚ 243,368 ‚ 10.2 ‚ 67.9 ‚ 9.1 ‚ 87.2 ‚ 11.7 ‚ 77.9 ‚ 10.4 ‚ ‚ 72.1 ‚ 94.3 ‚ 65.8 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 11,058 ‚ 11,380 ‚ 13,136 ‚ 35,573 ‚ 4.0 ‚ 4.1 ‚ 4.7 ‚ 12.8 ‚ 31.1 ‚ 32.0 ‚ 36.9 ‚ ‚ 27.9 ‚ 5.7 ‚ 34.2 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 39,607 200,906 38,428 278,941 14.2 72.0 13.8 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 44 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table of poor8 by hinstat poor8(msi-ce-ga) hinstat(Persons Summary Health Insurance Coverage Status) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚Not cover‚Has priva‚Has publi‚ Total ‚ed by hea‚te health‚c health ‚ ‚lth insur‚ insuranc‚insurance‚ ‚ance ‚e coverag‚ coverage‚ ‚ ‚e ‚ ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 28,756 ‚ 189,948 ‚ 25,980 ‚ 244,684 ‚ 10.3 ‚ 68.1 ‚ 9.3 ‚ 87.7 ‚ 11.8 ‚ 77.6 ‚ 10.6 ‚ ‚ 72.6 ‚ 94.5 ‚ 67.6 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 10,850 ‚ 10,958 ‚ 12,449 ‚ 34,257 ‚ 3.9 ‚ 3.9 ‚ 4.5 ‚ 12.3 ‚ 31.7 ‚ 32.0 ‚ 36.3 ‚ ‚ 27.4 ‚ 5.5 ‚ 32.4 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 39,607 200,906 38,428 278,941 14.2 72.0 13.8 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 45 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table of poor9 by hinstat poor9(mit-ce-ga) hinstat(Persons Summary Health Insurance Coverage Status) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚Not cover‚Has priva‚Has publi‚ Total ‚ed by hea‚te health‚c health ‚ ‚lth insur‚ insuranc‚insurance‚ ‚ance ‚e coverag‚ coverage‚ ‚ ‚e ‚ ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 28,014 ‚ 189,045 ‚ 26,432 ‚ 243,491 ‚ 10.0 ‚ 67.8 ‚ 9.5 ‚ 87.3 ‚ 11.5 ‚ 77.6 ‚ 10.9 ‚ ‚ 70.7 ‚ 94.1 ‚ 68.8 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 11,593 ‚ 11,861 ‚ 11,996 ‚ 35,450 ‚ 4.2 ‚ 4.3 ‚ 4.3 ‚ 12.7 ‚ 32.7 ‚ 33.5 ‚ 33.8 ‚ ‚ 29.3 ‚ 5.9 ‚ 31.2 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 39,607 200,906 38,428 278,941 14.2 72.0 13.8 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 46 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table of poor10 by hinstat poor10(cmb-ce-ga) hinstat(Persons Summary Health Insurance Coverage Status) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚Not cover‚Has priva‚Has publi‚ Total ‚ed by hea‚te health‚c health ‚ ‚lth insur‚ insuranc‚insurance‚ ‚ance ‚e coverag‚ coverage‚ ‚ ‚e ‚ ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 28,425 ‚ 189,371 ‚ 25,531 ‚ 243,328 ‚ 10.2 ‚ 67.9 ‚ 9.2 ‚ 87.2 ‚ 11.7 ‚ 77.8 ‚ 10.5 ‚ ‚ 71.8 ‚ 94.3 ‚ 66.4 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 11,181 ‚ 11,535 ‚ 12,897 ‚ 35,613 ‚ 4.0 ‚ 4.1 ‚ 4.6 ‚ 12.8 ‚ 31.4 ‚ 32.4 ‚ 36.2 ‚ ‚ 28.2 ‚ 5.7 ‚ 33.6 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 39,607 200,906 38,428 278,941 14.2 72.0 13.8 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 47 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table of poor11 by hinstat poor11(msi-ce-nga) hinstat(Persons Summary Health Insurance Coverage Status) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚Not cover‚Has priva‚Has publi‚ Total ‚ed by hea‚te health‚c health ‚ ‚lth insur‚ insuranc‚insurance‚ ‚ance ‚e coverag‚ coverage‚ ‚ ‚e ‚ ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 28,755 ‚ 189,831 ‚ 25,699 ‚ 244,286 ‚ 10.3 ‚ 68.1 ‚ 9.2 ‚ 87.6 ‚ 11.8 ‚ 77.7 ‚ 10.5 ‚ ‚ 72.6 ‚ 94.5 ‚ 66.9 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 10,851 ‚ 11,075 ‚ 12,729 ‚ 34,655 ‚ 3.9 ‚ 4.0 ‚ 4.6 ‚ 12.4 ‚ 31.3 ‚ 32.0 ‚ 36.7 ‚ ‚ 27.4 ‚ 5.5 ‚ 33.1 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 39,607 200,906 38,428 278,941 14.2 72.0 13.8 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 48 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table of poor12 by hinstat poor12(mit-ce-nga) hinstat(Persons Summary Health Insurance Coverage Status) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚Not cover‚Has priva‚Has publi‚ Total ‚ed by hea‚te health‚c health ‚ ‚lth insur‚ insuranc‚insurance‚ ‚ance ‚e coverag‚ coverage‚ ‚ ‚e ‚ ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 28,068 ‚ 188,918 ‚ 26,084 ‚ 243,071 ‚ 10.1 ‚ 67.7 ‚ 9.4 ‚ 87.1 ‚ 11.5 ‚ 77.7 ‚ 10.7 ‚ ‚ 70.9 ‚ 94.0 ‚ 67.9 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 11,538 ‚ 11,988 ‚ 12,344 ‚ 35,870 ‚ 4.1 ‚ 4.3 ‚ 4.4 ‚ 12.9 ‚ 32.2 ‚ 33.4 ‚ 34.4 ‚ ‚ 29.1 ‚ 6.0 ‚ 32.1 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 39,607 200,906 38,428 278,941 14.2 72.0 13.8 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 49 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table of poor13 by hinstat poor13(cmb-ce-nga) hinstat(Persons Summary Health Insurance Coverage Status) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚Not cover‚Has priva‚Has publi‚ Total ‚ed by hea‚te health‚c health ‚ ‚lth insur‚ insuranc‚insurance‚ ‚ance ‚e coverag‚ coverage‚ ‚ ‚e ‚ ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 28,450 ‚ 189,280 ‚ 25,172 ‚ 242,902 ‚ 10.2 ‚ 67.9 ‚ 9.0 ‚ 87.1 ‚ 11.7 ‚ 77.9 ‚ 10.4 ‚ ‚ 71.8 ‚ 94.2 ‚ 65.5 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 11,157 ‚ 11,626 ‚ 13,256 ‚ 36,039 ‚ 4.0 ‚ 4.2 ‚ 4.8 ‚ 12.9 ‚ 31.0 ‚ 32.3 ‚ 36.8 ‚ ‚ 28.2 ‚ 5.8 ‚ 34.5 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 39,607 200,906 38,428 278,941 14.2 72.0 13.8 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 50 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table of poor1 by A_REORGN poor1(official poverty) A_REORGN(Person Hispanic Origin) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚Hispanic ‚Not Hispa‚ Total ‚ ‚nic ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 28,208 ‚ 219,157 ‚ 247,365 ‚ 10.1 ‚ 78.6 ‚ 88.7 ‚ 11.4 ‚ 88.6 ‚ ‚ 78.5 ‚ 90.2 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 7,743 ‚ 23,833 ‚ 31,576 ‚ 2.8 ‚ 8.5 ‚ 11.3 ‚ 24.5 ‚ 75.5 ‚ ‚ 21.5 ‚ 9.8 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 35,951 242,990 278,941 12.9 87.1 100.0 Table of poor2 by A_REORGN poor2(msi-cpi-ga) A_REORGN(Person Hispanic Origin) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚Hispanic ‚Not Hispa‚ Total ‚ ‚nic ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 27,383 ‚ 218,280 ‚ 245,663 ‚ 9.8 ‚ 78.3 ‚ 88.1 ‚ 11.1 ‚ 88.9 ‚ ‚ 76.2 ‚ 89.8 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 8,568 ‚ 24,710 ‚ 33,278 ‚ 3.1 ‚ 8.9 ‚ 11.9 ‚ 25.7 ‚ 74.3 ‚ ‚ 23.8 ‚ 10.2 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 35,951 242,990 278,941 12.9 87.1 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 51 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table of poor3 by A_REORGN poor3(mit-cpi-ga) A_REORGN(Person Hispanic Origin) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚Hispanic ‚Not Hispa‚ Total ‚ ‚nic ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 26,684 ‚ 217,633 ‚ 244,317 ‚ 9.6 ‚ 78.0 ‚ 87.6 ‚ 10.9 ‚ 89.1 ‚ ‚ 74.2 ‚ 89.6 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 9,267 ‚ 25,357 ‚ 34,624 ‚ 3.3 ‚ 9.1 ‚ 12.4 ‚ 26.8 ‚ 73.2 ‚ ‚ 25.8 ‚ 10.4 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 35,951 242,990 278,941 12.9 87.1 100.0 Table of poor4 by A_REORGN poor4(cmb-cpi-ga) A_REORGN(Person Hispanic Origin) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚Hispanic ‚Not Hispa‚ Total ‚ ‚nic ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 26,880 ‚ 217,001 ‚ 243,881 ‚ 9.6 ‚ 77.8 ‚ 87.4 ‚ 11.0 ‚ 89.0 ‚ ‚ 74.8 ‚ 89.3 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 9,071 ‚ 25,989 ‚ 35,060 ‚ 3.3 ‚ 9.3 ‚ 12.6 ‚ 25.9 ‚ 74.1 ‚ ‚ 25.2 ‚ 10.7 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 35,951 242,990 278,941 12.9 87.1 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 52 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table of poor5 by A_REORGN poor5(msi-cpi-nga) A_REORGN(Person Hispanic Origin) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚Hispanic ‚Not Hispa‚ Total ‚ ‚nic ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 28,210 ‚ 217,039 ‚ 245,249 ‚ 10.1 ‚ 77.8 ‚ 87.9 ‚ 11.5 ‚ 88.5 ‚ ‚ 78.5 ‚ 89.3 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 7,741 ‚ 25,950 ‚ 33,692 ‚ 2.8 ‚ 9.3 ‚ 12.1 ‚ 23.0 ‚ 77.0 ‚ ‚ 21.5 ‚ 10.7 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 35,951 242,990 278,941 12.9 87.1 100.0 Table of poor6 by A_REORGN poor6(mit-cpi-nga) A_REORGN(Person Hispanic Origin) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚Hispanic ‚Not Hispa‚ Total ‚ ‚nic ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 27,607 ‚ 216,224 ‚ 243,831 ‚ 9.9 ‚ 77.5 ‚ 87.4 ‚ 11.3 ‚ 88.7 ‚ ‚ 76.8 ‚ 89.0 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 8,344 ‚ 26,766 ‚ 35,110 ‚ 3.0 ‚ 9.6 ‚ 12.6 ‚ 23.8 ‚ 76.2 ‚ ‚ 23.2 ‚ 11.0 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 35,951 242,990 278,941 12.9 87.1 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 53 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table of poor7 by A_REORGN poor7(cmb-cpi-nga) A_REORGN(Person Hispanic Origin) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚Hispanic ‚Not Hispa‚ Total ‚ ‚nic ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 27,774 ‚ 215,594 ‚ 243,368 ‚ 10.0 ‚ 77.3 ‚ 87.2 ‚ 11.4 ‚ 88.6 ‚ ‚ 77.3 ‚ 88.7 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 8,177 ‚ 27,396 ‚ 35,573 ‚ 2.9 ‚ 9.8 ‚ 12.8 ‚ 23.0 ‚ 77.0 ‚ ‚ 22.7 ‚ 11.3 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 35,951 242,990 278,941 12.9 87.1 100.0 Table of poor8 by A_REORGN poor8(msi-ce-ga) A_REORGN(Person Hispanic Origin) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚Hispanic ‚Not Hispa‚ Total ‚ ‚nic ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 27,172 ‚ 217,512 ‚ 244,684 ‚ 9.7 ‚ 78.0 ‚ 87.7 ‚ 11.1 ‚ 88.9 ‚ ‚ 75.6 ‚ 89.5 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 8,779 ‚ 25,478 ‚ 34,257 ‚ 3.1 ‚ 9.1 ‚ 12.3 ‚ 25.6 ‚ 74.4 ‚ ‚ 24.4 ‚ 10.5 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 35,951 242,990 278,941 12.9 87.1 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 54 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table of poor9 by A_REORGN poor9(mit-ce-ga) A_REORGN(Person Hispanic Origin) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚Hispanic ‚Not Hispa‚ Total ‚ ‚nic ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 26,491 ‚ 217,000 ‚ 243,491 ‚ 9.5 ‚ 77.8 ‚ 87.3 ‚ 10.9 ‚ 89.1 ‚ ‚ 73.7 ‚ 89.3 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 9,460 ‚ 25,990 ‚ 35,450 ‚ 3.4 ‚ 9.3 ‚ 12.7 ‚ 26.7 ‚ 73.3 ‚ ‚ 26.3 ‚ 10.7 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 35,951 242,990 278,941 12.9 87.1 100.0 Table of poor10 by A_REORGN poor10(cmb-ce-ga) A_REORGN(Person Hispanic Origin) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚Hispanic ‚Not Hispa‚ Total ‚ ‚nic ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 26,757 ‚ 216,571 ‚ 243,328 ‚ 9.6 ‚ 77.6 ‚ 87.2 ‚ 11.0 ‚ 89.0 ‚ ‚ 74.4 ‚ 89.1 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 9,194 ‚ 26,419 ‚ 35,613 ‚ 3.3 ‚ 9.5 ‚ 12.8 ‚ 25.8 ‚ 74.2 ‚ ‚ 25.6 ‚ 10.9 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 35,951 242,990 278,941 12.9 87.1 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 55 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table of poor11 by A_REORGN poor11(msi-ce-nga) A_REORGN(Person Hispanic Origin) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚Hispanic ‚Not Hispa‚ Total ‚ ‚nic ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 27,996 ‚ 216,289 ‚ 244,286 ‚ 10.0 ‚ 77.5 ‚ 87.6 ‚ 11.5 ‚ 88.5 ‚ ‚ 77.9 ‚ 89.0 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 7,954 ‚ 26,701 ‚ 34,655 ‚ 2.9 ‚ 9.6 ‚ 12.4 ‚ 23.0 ‚ 77.0 ‚ ‚ 22.1 ‚ 11.0 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 35,951 242,990 278,941 12.9 87.1 100.0 Table of poor12 by A_REORGN poor12(mit-ce-nga) A_REORGN(Person Hispanic Origin) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚Hispanic ‚Not Hispa‚ Total ‚ ‚nic ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 27,484 ‚ 215,586 ‚ 243,071 ‚ 9.9 ‚ 77.3 ‚ 87.1 ‚ 11.3 ‚ 88.7 ‚ ‚ 76.4 ‚ 88.7 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 8,467 ‚ 27,403 ‚ 35,870 ‚ 3.0 ‚ 9.8 ‚ 12.9 ‚ 23.6 ‚ 76.4 ‚ ‚ 23.6 ‚ 11.3 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 35,951 242,990 278,941 12.9 87.1 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 56 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table of poor13 by A_REORGN poor13(cmb-ce-nga) A_REORGN(Person Hispanic Origin) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚Hispanic ‚Not Hispa‚ Total ‚ ‚nic ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 27,682 ‚ 215,220 ‚ 242,902 ‚ 9.9 ‚ 77.2 ‚ 87.1 ‚ 11.4 ‚ 88.6 ‚ ‚ 77.0 ‚ 88.6 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 8,269 ‚ 27,770 ‚ 36,039 ‚ 3.0 ‚ 10.0 ‚ 12.9 ‚ 22.9 ‚ 77.1 ‚ ‚ 23.0 ‚ 11.4 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 35,951 242,990 278,941 12.9 87.1 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 57 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table 1 of poor1 by FKIND Controlling for FTYPE=Primary family poor1(official poverty) FKIND(Kind of Family) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚In a marr‚In a sing‚In a sing‚ Total ‚ied coupl‚le family‚le family‚ ‚e family ‚ with mal‚ with fem‚ ‚ ‚e family ‚ale famil‚ ‚ ‚reference‚y referen‚ ‚ ‚ person ‚ce person‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 171,596 ‚ 10,517 ‚ 27,450 ‚ 209,564 ‚ 74.0 ‚ 4.5 ‚ 11.8 ‚ 90.4 ‚ 81.9 ‚ 5.0 ‚ 13.1 ‚ ‚ 94.5 ‚ 88.3 ‚ 71.5 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 10,028 ‚ 1,392 ‚ 10,925 ‚ 22,345 ‚ 4.3 ‚ 0.6 ‚ 4.7 ‚ 9.6 ‚ 44.9 ‚ 6.2 ‚ 48.9 ‚ ‚ 5.5 ‚ 11.7 ‚ 28.5 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 181,624 11,910 38,375 231,909 78.3 5.1 16.5 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 58 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table 2 of poor1 by FKIND Controlling for FTYPE=Nonfamily householder poor1(official poverty) FKIND(Kind of Family) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚In a marr‚In a sing‚In a sing‚ Total ‚ied coupl‚le family‚le family‚ ‚e family ‚ with mal‚ with fem‚ ‚ ‚e family ‚ale famil‚ ‚ ‚reference‚y referen‚ ‚ ‚ person ‚ce person‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 0 ‚ 13,351 ‚ 15,420 ‚ 28,771 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 38.7 ‚ 44.7 ‚ 83.4 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 46.4 ‚ 53.6 ‚ ‚ . ‚ 86.8 ‚ 80.6 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 0 ‚ 2,033 ‚ 3,707 ‚ 5,740 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 5.9 ‚ 10.7 ‚ 16.6 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 35.4 ‚ 64.6 ‚ ‚ . ‚ 13.2 ‚ 19.4 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 0 15,384 19,127 34,511 0.0 44.6 55.4 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 59 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table 3 of poor1 by FKIND Controlling for FTYPE=Unrelated subfamily poor1(official poverty) FKIND(Kind of Family) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚In a marr‚In a sing‚In a sing‚ Total ‚ied coupl‚le family‚le family‚ ‚e family ‚ with mal‚ with fem‚ ‚ ‚e family ‚ale famil‚ ‚ ‚reference‚y referen‚ ‚ ‚ person ‚ce person‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 83 ‚ 107 ‚ 640 ‚ 830 ‚ 5.9 ‚ 7.6 ‚ 45.5 ‚ 59.0 ‚ 9.9 ‚ 12.9 ‚ 77.2 ‚ ‚ 72.1 ‚ 68.8 ‚ 56.3 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 32 ‚ 48 ‚ 497 ‚ 578 ‚ 2.3 ‚ 3.4 ‚ 35.3 ‚ 41.0 ‚ 5.5 ‚ 8.4 ‚ 86.1 ‚ ‚ 27.9 ‚ 31.2 ‚ 43.7 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 114 155 1,138 1,407 8.1 11.0 80.8 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 60 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table 4 of poor1 by FKIND Controlling for FTYPE=Secondary individual (unrelated to householder) poor1(official poverty) FKIND(Kind of Family) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚In a marr‚In a sing‚In a sing‚ Total ‚ied coupl‚le family‚le family‚ ‚e family ‚ with mal‚ with fem‚ ‚ ‚e family ‚ale famil‚ ‚ ‚reference‚y referen‚ ‚ ‚ person ‚ce person‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 0 ‚ 5,104 ‚ 3,097 ‚ 8,200 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 45.9 ‚ 27.9 ‚ 73.8 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 62.2 ‚ 37.8 ‚ ‚ . ‚ 78.6 ‚ 67.1 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 0 ‚ 1,393 ‚ 1,520 ‚ 2,913 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 12.5 ‚ 13.7 ‚ 26.2 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 47.8 ‚ 52.2 ‚ ‚ . ‚ 21.4 ‚ 32.9 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 0 6,496 4,617 11,113 0.0 58.5 41.5 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 61 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table 1 of poor2 by FKIND Controlling for FTYPE=Primary family poor2(msi-cpi-ga) FKIND(Kind of Family) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚In a marr‚In a sing‚In a sing‚ Total ‚ied coupl‚le family‚le family‚ ‚e family ‚ with mal‚ with fem‚ ‚ ‚e family ‚ale famil‚ ‚ ‚reference‚y referen‚ ‚ ‚ person ‚ce person‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 169,964 ‚ 10,159 ‚ 28,492 ‚ 208,616 ‚ 73.3 ‚ 4.4 ‚ 12.3 ‚ 90.0 ‚ 81.5 ‚ 4.9 ‚ 13.7 ‚ ‚ 93.6 ‚ 85.3 ‚ 74.2 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 11,660 ‚ 1,751 ‚ 9,883 ‚ 23,293 ‚ 5.0 ‚ 0.8 ‚ 4.3 ‚ 10.0 ‚ 50.1 ‚ 7.5 ‚ 42.4 ‚ ‚ 6.4 ‚ 14.7 ‚ 25.8 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 181,624 11,910 38,375 231,909 78.3 5.1 16.5 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 62 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table 2 of poor2 by FKIND Controlling for FTYPE=Nonfamily householder poor2(msi-cpi-ga) FKIND(Kind of Family) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚In a marr‚In a sing‚In a sing‚ Total ‚ied coupl‚le family‚le family‚ ‚e family ‚ with mal‚ with fem‚ ‚ ‚e family ‚ale famil‚ ‚ ‚reference‚y referen‚ ‚ ‚ person ‚ce person‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 0 ‚ 13,249 ‚ 15,199 ‚ 28,448 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 38.4 ‚ 44.0 ‚ 82.4 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 46.6 ‚ 53.4 ‚ ‚ . ‚ 86.1 ‚ 79.5 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 0 ‚ 2,136 ‚ 3,928 ‚ 6,064 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 6.2 ‚ 11.4 ‚ 17.6 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 35.2 ‚ 64.8 ‚ ‚ . ‚ 13.9 ‚ 20.5 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 0 15,384 19,127 34,511 0.0 44.6 55.4 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 63 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table 3 of poor2 by FKIND Controlling for FTYPE=Unrelated subfamily poor2(msi-cpi-ga) FKIND(Kind of Family) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚In a marr‚In a sing‚In a sing‚ Total ‚ied coupl‚le family‚le family‚ ‚e family ‚ with mal‚ with fem‚ ‚ ‚e family ‚ale famil‚ ‚ ‚reference‚y referen‚ ‚ ‚ person ‚ce person‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 76 ‚ 104 ‚ 618 ‚ 797 ‚ 5.4 ‚ 7.4 ‚ 43.9 ‚ 56.7 ‚ 9.5 ‚ 13.0 ‚ 77.5 ‚ ‚ 66.1 ‚ 66.8 ‚ 54.3 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 39 ‚ 51 ‚ 520 ‚ 610 ‚ 2.8 ‚ 3.7 ‚ 36.9 ‚ 43.3 ‚ 6.4 ‚ 8.4 ‚ 85.2 ‚ ‚ 33.9 ‚ 33.2 ‚ 45.7 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 114 155 1,138 1,407 8.1 11.0 80.8 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 64 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table 4 of poor2 by FKIND Controlling for FTYPE=Secondary individual (unrelated to householder) poor2(msi-cpi-ga) FKIND(Kind of Family) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚In a marr‚In a sing‚In a sing‚ Total ‚ied coupl‚le family‚le family‚ ‚e family ‚ with mal‚ with fem‚ ‚ ‚e family ‚ale famil‚ ‚ ‚reference‚y referen‚ ‚ ‚ person ‚ce person‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 0 ‚ 4,870 ‚ 2,932 ‚ 7,803 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 43.8 ‚ 26.4 ‚ 70.2 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 62.4 ‚ 37.6 ‚ ‚ . ‚ 75.0 ‚ 63.5 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 0 ‚ 1,626 ‚ 1,684 ‚ 3,310 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 14.6 ‚ 15.2 ‚ 29.8 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 49.1 ‚ 50.9 ‚ ‚ . ‚ 25.0 ‚ 36.5 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 0 6,496 4,617 11,113 0.0 58.5 41.5 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 65 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table 1 of poor3 by FKIND Controlling for FTYPE=Primary family poor3(mit-cpi-ga) FKIND(Kind of Family) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚In a marr‚In a sing‚In a sing‚ Total ‚ied coupl‚le family‚le family‚ ‚e family ‚ with mal‚ with fem‚ ‚ ‚e family ‚ale famil‚ ‚ ‚reference‚y referen‚ ‚ ‚ person ‚ce person‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 169,203 ‚ 10,081 ‚ 27,867 ‚ 207,151 ‚ 73.0 ‚ 4.3 ‚ 12.0 ‚ 89.3 ‚ 81.7 ‚ 4.9 ‚ 13.5 ‚ ‚ 93.2 ‚ 84.6 ‚ 72.6 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 12,421 ‚ 1,829 ‚ 10,508 ‚ 24,758 ‚ 5.4 ‚ 0.8 ‚ 4.5 ‚ 10.7 ‚ 50.2 ‚ 7.4 ‚ 42.4 ‚ ‚ 6.8 ‚ 15.4 ‚ 27.4 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 181,624 11,910 38,375 231,909 78.3 5.1 16.5 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 66 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table 2 of poor3 by FKIND Controlling for FTYPE=Nonfamily householder poor3(mit-cpi-ga) FKIND(Kind of Family) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚In a marr‚In a sing‚In a sing‚ Total ‚ied coupl‚le family‚le family‚ ‚e family ‚ with mal‚ with fem‚ ‚ ‚e family ‚ale famil‚ ‚ ‚reference‚y referen‚ ‚ ‚ person ‚ce person‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 0 ‚ 13,280 ‚ 15,448 ‚ 28,729 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 38.5 ‚ 44.8 ‚ 83.2 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 46.2 ‚ 53.8 ‚ ‚ . ‚ 86.3 ‚ 80.8 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 0 ‚ 2,104 ‚ 3,679 ‚ 5,783 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 6.1 ‚ 10.7 ‚ 16.8 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 36.4 ‚ 63.6 ‚ ‚ . ‚ 13.7 ‚ 19.2 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 0 15,384 19,127 34,511 0.0 44.6 55.4 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 67 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table 3 of poor3 by FKIND Controlling for FTYPE=Unrelated subfamily poor3(mit-cpi-ga) FKIND(Kind of Family) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚In a marr‚In a sing‚In a sing‚ Total ‚ied coupl‚le family‚le family‚ ‚e family ‚ with mal‚ with fem‚ ‚ ‚e family ‚ale famil‚ ‚ ‚reference‚y referen‚ ‚ ‚ person ‚ce person‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 76 ‚ 101 ‚ 618 ‚ 795 ‚ 5.4 ‚ 7.2 ‚ 43.9 ‚ 56.5 ‚ 9.5 ‚ 12.7 ‚ 77.8 ‚ ‚ 66.1 ‚ 65.0 ‚ 54.3 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 39 ‚ 54 ‚ 520 ‚ 613 ‚ 2.8 ‚ 3.9 ‚ 36.9 ‚ 43.5 ‚ 6.3 ‚ 8.9 ‚ 84.8 ‚ ‚ 33.9 ‚ 35.0 ‚ 45.7 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 114 155 1,138 1,407 8.1 11.0 80.8 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 68 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table 4 of poor3 by FKIND Controlling for FTYPE=Secondary individual (unrelated to householder) poor3(mit-cpi-ga) FKIND(Kind of Family) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚In a marr‚In a sing‚In a sing‚ Total ‚ied coupl‚le family‚le family‚ ‚e family ‚ with mal‚ with fem‚ ‚ ‚e family ‚ale famil‚ ‚ ‚reference‚y referen‚ ‚ ‚ person ‚ce person‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 0 ‚ 4,761 ‚ 2,882 ‚ 7,642 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 42.8 ‚ 25.9 ‚ 68.8 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 62.3 ‚ 37.7 ‚ ‚ . ‚ 73.3 ‚ 62.4 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 0 ‚ 1,736 ‚ 1,735 ‚ 3,471 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 15.6 ‚ 15.6 ‚ 31.2 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 50.0 ‚ 50.0 ‚ ‚ . ‚ 26.7 ‚ 37.6 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 0 6,496 4,617 11,113 0.0 58.5 41.5 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 69 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table 1 of poor4 by FKIND Controlling for FTYPE=Primary family poor4(cmb-cpi-ga) FKIND(Kind of Family) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚In a marr‚In a sing‚In a sing‚ Total ‚ied coupl‚le family‚le family‚ ‚e family ‚ with mal‚ with fem‚ ‚ ‚e family ‚ale famil‚ ‚ ‚reference‚y referen‚ ‚ ‚ person ‚ce person‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 169,192 ‚ 10,091 ‚ 27,908 ‚ 207,191 ‚ 73.0 ‚ 4.4 ‚ 12.0 ‚ 89.3 ‚ 81.7 ‚ 4.9 ‚ 13.5 ‚ ‚ 93.2 ‚ 84.7 ‚ 72.7 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 12,432 ‚ 1,819 ‚ 10,467 ‚ 24,718 ‚ 5.4 ‚ 0.8 ‚ 4.5 ‚ 10.7 ‚ 50.3 ‚ 7.4 ‚ 42.3 ‚ ‚ 6.8 ‚ 15.3 ‚ 27.3 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 181,624 11,910 38,375 231,909 78.3 5.1 16.5 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 70 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table 2 of poor4 by FKIND Controlling for FTYPE=Nonfamily householder poor4(cmb-cpi-ga) FKIND(Kind of Family) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚In a marr‚In a sing‚In a sing‚ Total ‚ied coupl‚le family‚le family‚ ‚e family ‚ with mal‚ with fem‚ ‚ ‚e family ‚ale famil‚ ‚ ‚reference‚y referen‚ ‚ ‚ person ‚ce person‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 0 ‚ 13,171 ‚ 15,033 ‚ 28,205 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 38.2 ‚ 43.6 ‚ 81.7 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 46.7 ‚ 53.3 ‚ ‚ . ‚ 85.6 ‚ 78.6 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 0 ‚ 2,213 ‚ 4,094 ‚ 6,307 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 6.4 ‚ 11.9 ‚ 18.3 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 35.1 ‚ 64.9 ‚ ‚ . ‚ 14.4 ‚ 21.4 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 0 15,384 19,127 34,511 0.0 44.6 55.4 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 71 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table 3 of poor4 by FKIND Controlling for FTYPE=Unrelated subfamily poor4(cmb-cpi-ga) FKIND(Kind of Family) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚In a marr‚In a sing‚In a sing‚ Total ‚ied coupl‚le family‚le family‚ ‚e family ‚ with mal‚ with fem‚ ‚ ‚e family ‚ale famil‚ ‚ ‚reference‚y referen‚ ‚ ‚ person ‚ce person‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 76 ‚ 104 ‚ 604 ‚ 783 ‚ 5.4 ‚ 7.4 ‚ 42.9 ‚ 55.7 ‚ 9.7 ‚ 13.2 ‚ 77.1 ‚ ‚ 66.1 ‚ 66.8 ‚ 53.1 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 39 ‚ 51 ‚ 534 ‚ 624 ‚ 2.8 ‚ 3.7 ‚ 37.9 ‚ 44.3 ‚ 6.2 ‚ 8.3 ‚ 85.5 ‚ ‚ 33.9 ‚ 33.2 ‚ 46.9 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 114 155 1,138 1,407 8.1 11.0 80.8 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 72 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table 4 of poor4 by FKIND Controlling for FTYPE=Secondary individual (unrelated to householder) poor4(cmb-cpi-ga) FKIND(Kind of Family) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚In a marr‚In a sing‚In a sing‚ Total ‚ied coupl‚le family‚le family‚ ‚e family ‚ with mal‚ with fem‚ ‚ ‚e family ‚ale famil‚ ‚ ‚reference‚y referen‚ ‚ ‚ person ‚ce person‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 0 ‚ 4,809 ‚ 2,894 ‚ 7,702 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 43.3 ‚ 26.0 ‚ 69.3 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 62.4 ‚ 37.6 ‚ ‚ . ‚ 74.0 ‚ 62.7 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 0 ‚ 1,688 ‚ 1,723 ‚ 3,411 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 15.2 ‚ 15.5 ‚ 30.7 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 49.5 ‚ 50.5 ‚ ‚ . ‚ 26.0 ‚ 37.3 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 0 6,496 4,617 11,113 0.0 58.5 41.5 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 73 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table 1 of poor5 by FKIND Controlling for FTYPE=Primary family poor5(msi-cpi-nga) FKIND(Kind of Family) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚In a marr‚In a sing‚In a sing‚ Total ‚ied coupl‚le family‚le family‚ ‚e family ‚ with mal‚ with fem‚ ‚ ‚e family ‚ale famil‚ ‚ ‚reference‚y referen‚ ‚ ‚ person ‚ce person‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 169,903 ‚ 10,244 ‚ 28,179 ‚ 208,327 ‚ 73.3 ‚ 4.4 ‚ 12.2 ‚ 89.8 ‚ 81.6 ‚ 4.9 ‚ 13.5 ‚ ‚ 93.5 ‚ 86.0 ‚ 73.4 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 11,721 ‚ 1,666 ‚ 10,196 ‚ 23,582 ‚ 5.1 ‚ 0.7 ‚ 4.4 ‚ 10.2 ‚ 49.7 ‚ 7.1 ‚ 43.2 ‚ ‚ 6.5 ‚ 14.0 ‚ 26.6 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 181,624 11,910 38,375 231,909 78.3 5.1 16.5 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 74 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table 2 of poor5 by FKIND Controlling for FTYPE=Nonfamily householder poor5(msi-cpi-nga) FKIND(Kind of Family) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚In a marr‚In a sing‚In a sing‚ Total ‚ied coupl‚le family‚le family‚ ‚e family ‚ with mal‚ with fem‚ ‚ ‚e family ‚ale famil‚ ‚ ‚reference‚y referen‚ ‚ ‚ person ‚ce person‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 0 ‚ 13,193 ‚ 15,067 ‚ 28,260 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 38.2 ‚ 43.7 ‚ 81.9 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 46.7 ‚ 53.3 ‚ ‚ . ‚ 85.8 ‚ 78.8 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 0 ‚ 2,191 ‚ 4,061 ‚ 6,252 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 6.3 ‚ 11.8 ‚ 18.1 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 35.0 ‚ 65.0 ‚ ‚ . ‚ 14.2 ‚ 21.2 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 0 15,384 19,127 34,511 0.0 44.6 55.4 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 75 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table 3 of poor5 by FKIND Controlling for FTYPE=Unrelated subfamily poor5(msi-cpi-nga) FKIND(Kind of Family) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚In a marr‚In a sing‚In a sing‚ Total ‚ied coupl‚le family‚le family‚ ‚e family ‚ with mal‚ with fem‚ ‚ ‚e family ‚ale famil‚ ‚ ‚reference‚y referen‚ ‚ ‚ person ‚ce person‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 80 ‚ 104 ‚ 631 ‚ 814 ‚ 5.7 ‚ 7.4 ‚ 44.8 ‚ 57.9 ‚ 9.8 ‚ 12.8 ‚ 77.4 ‚ ‚ 69.5 ‚ 67.1 ‚ 55.4 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 35 ‚ 51 ‚ 507 ‚ 593 ‚ 2.5 ‚ 3.6 ‚ 36.0 ‚ 42.1 ‚ 5.9 ‚ 8.6 ‚ 85.5 ‚ ‚ 30.5 ‚ 32.9 ‚ 44.6 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 114 155 1,138 1,407 8.1 11.0 80.8 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 76 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table 4 of poor5 by FKIND Controlling for FTYPE=Secondary individual (unrelated to householder) poor5(msi-cpi-nga) FKIND(Kind of Family) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚In a marr‚In a sing‚In a sing‚ Total ‚ied coupl‚le family‚le family‚ ‚e family ‚ with mal‚ with fem‚ ‚ ‚e family ‚ale famil‚ ‚ ‚reference‚y referen‚ ‚ ‚ person ‚ce person‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 0 ‚ 4,893 ‚ 2,956 ‚ 7,848 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 44.0 ‚ 26.6 ‚ 70.6 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 62.3 ‚ 37.7 ‚ ‚ . ‚ 75.3 ‚ 64.0 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 0 ‚ 1,604 ‚ 1,661 ‚ 3,264 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 14.4 ‚ 14.9 ‚ 29.4 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 49.1 ‚ 50.9 ‚ ‚ . ‚ 24.7 ‚ 36.0 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 0 6,496 4,617 11,113 0.0 58.5 41.5 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 77 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table 1 of poor6 by FKIND Controlling for FTYPE=Primary family poor6(mit-cpi-nga) FKIND(Kind of Family) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚In a marr‚In a sing‚In a sing‚ Total ‚ied coupl‚le family‚le family‚ ‚e family ‚ with mal‚ with fem‚ ‚ ‚e family ‚ale famil‚ ‚ ‚reference‚y referen‚ ‚ ‚ person ‚ce person‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 169,018 ‚ 10,159 ‚ 27,616 ‚ 206,793 ‚ 72.9 ‚ 4.4 ‚ 11.9 ‚ 89.2 ‚ 81.7 ‚ 4.9 ‚ 13.4 ‚ ‚ 93.1 ‚ 85.3 ‚ 72.0 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 12,606 ‚ 1,751 ‚ 10,759 ‚ 25,116 ‚ 5.4 ‚ 0.8 ‚ 4.6 ‚ 10.8 ‚ 50.2 ‚ 7.0 ‚ 42.8 ‚ ‚ 6.9 ‚ 14.7 ‚ 28.0 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 181,624 11,910 38,375 231,909 78.3 5.1 16.5 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 78 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table 2 of poor6 by FKIND Controlling for FTYPE=Nonfamily householder poor6(mit-cpi-nga) FKIND(Kind of Family) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚In a marr‚In a sing‚In a sing‚ Total ‚ied coupl‚le family‚le family‚ ‚e family ‚ with mal‚ with fem‚ ‚ ‚e family ‚ale famil‚ ‚ ‚reference‚y referen‚ ‚ ‚ person ‚ce person‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 0 ‚ 13,223 ‚ 15,278 ‚ 28,501 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 38.3 ‚ 44.3 ‚ 82.6 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 46.4 ‚ 53.6 ‚ ‚ . ‚ 86.0 ‚ 79.9 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 0 ‚ 2,161 ‚ 3,850 ‚ 6,011 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 6.3 ‚ 11.2 ‚ 17.4 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 36.0 ‚ 64.0 ‚ ‚ . ‚ 14.0 ‚ 20.1 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 0 15,384 19,127 34,511 0.0 44.6 55.4 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 79 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table 3 of poor6 by FKIND Controlling for FTYPE=Unrelated subfamily poor6(mit-cpi-nga) FKIND(Kind of Family) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚In a marr‚In a sing‚In a sing‚ Total ‚ied coupl‚le family‚le family‚ ‚e family ‚ with mal‚ with fem‚ ‚ ‚e family ‚ale famil‚ ‚ ‚reference‚y referen‚ ‚ ‚ person ‚ce person‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 80 ‚ 99 ‚ 618 ‚ 797 ‚ 5.7 ‚ 7.0 ‚ 43.9 ‚ 56.6 ‚ 10.0 ‚ 12.4 ‚ 77.6 ‚ ‚ 69.5 ‚ 63.7 ‚ 54.3 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 35 ‚ 56 ‚ 519 ‚ 611 ‚ 2.5 ‚ 4.0 ‚ 36.9 ‚ 43.4 ‚ 5.7 ‚ 9.2 ‚ 85.1 ‚ ‚ 30.5 ‚ 36.3 ‚ 45.7 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 114 155 1,138 1,407 8.1 11.0 80.8 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 80 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table 4 of poor6 by FKIND Controlling for FTYPE=Secondary individual (unrelated to householder) poor6(mit-cpi-nga) FKIND(Kind of Family) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚In a marr‚In a sing‚In a sing‚ Total ‚ied coupl‚le family‚le family‚ ‚e family ‚ with mal‚ with fem‚ ‚ ‚e family ‚ale famil‚ ‚ ‚reference‚y referen‚ ‚ ‚ person ‚ce person‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 0 ‚ 4,835 ‚ 2,906 ‚ 7,740 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 43.5 ‚ 26.1 ‚ 69.7 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 62.5 ‚ 37.5 ‚ ‚ . ‚ 74.4 ‚ 62.9 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 0 ‚ 1,662 ‚ 1,711 ‚ 3,372 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 15.0 ‚ 15.4 ‚ 30.3 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 49.3 ‚ 50.7 ‚ ‚ . ‚ 25.6 ‚ 37.1 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 0 6,496 4,617 11,113 0.0 58.5 41.5 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 81 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table 1 of poor7 by FKIND Controlling for FTYPE=Primary family poor7(cmb-cpi-nga) FKIND(Kind of Family) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚In a marr‚In a sing‚In a sing‚ Total ‚ied coupl‚le family‚le family‚ ‚e family ‚ with mal‚ with fem‚ ‚ ‚e family ‚ale famil‚ ‚ ‚reference‚y referen‚ ‚ ‚ person ‚ce person‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 169,115 ‚ 10,172 ‚ 27,578 ‚ 206,865 ‚ 72.9 ‚ 4.4 ‚ 11.9 ‚ 89.2 ‚ 81.8 ‚ 4.9 ‚ 13.3 ‚ ‚ 93.1 ‚ 85.4 ‚ 71.9 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 12,509 ‚ 1,738 ‚ 10,797 ‚ 25,044 ‚ 5.4 ‚ 0.7 ‚ 4.7 ‚ 10.8 ‚ 49.9 ‚ 6.9 ‚ 43.1 ‚ ‚ 6.9 ‚ 14.6 ‚ 28.1 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 181,624 11,910 38,375 231,909 78.3 5.1 16.5 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 82 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table 2 of poor7 by FKIND Controlling for FTYPE=Nonfamily householder poor7(cmb-cpi-nga) FKIND(Kind of Family) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚In a marr‚In a sing‚In a sing‚ Total ‚ied coupl‚le family‚le family‚ ‚e family ‚ with mal‚ with fem‚ ‚ ‚e family ‚ale famil‚ ‚ ‚reference‚y referen‚ ‚ ‚ person ‚ce person‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 0 ‚ 13,073 ‚ 14,844 ‚ 27,917 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 37.9 ‚ 43.0 ‚ 80.9 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 46.8 ‚ 53.2 ‚ ‚ . ‚ 85.0 ‚ 77.6 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 0 ‚ 2,312 ‚ 4,283 ‚ 6,595 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 6.7 ‚ 12.4 ‚ 19.1 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 35.1 ‚ 64.9 ‚ ‚ . ‚ 15.0 ‚ 22.4 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 0 15,384 19,127 34,511 0.0 44.6 55.4 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 83 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table 3 of poor7 by FKIND Controlling for FTYPE=Unrelated subfamily poor7(cmb-cpi-nga) FKIND(Kind of Family) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚In a marr‚In a sing‚In a sing‚ Total ‚ied coupl‚le family‚le family‚ ‚e family ‚ with mal‚ with fem‚ ‚ ‚e family ‚ale famil‚ ‚ ‚reference‚y referen‚ ‚ ‚ person ‚ce person‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 80 ‚ 101 ‚ 620 ‚ 801 ‚ 5.7 ‚ 7.2 ‚ 44.1 ‚ 56.9 ‚ 9.9 ‚ 12.6 ‚ 77.4 ‚ ‚ 69.5 ‚ 65.1 ‚ 54.5 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 35 ‚ 54 ‚ 518 ‚ 607 ‚ 2.5 ‚ 3.9 ‚ 36.8 ‚ 43.1 ‚ 5.8 ‚ 8.9 ‚ 85.3 ‚ ‚ 30.5 ‚ 34.9 ‚ 45.5 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 114 155 1,138 1,407 8.1 11.0 80.8 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 84 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table 4 of poor7 by FKIND Controlling for FTYPE=Secondary individual (unrelated to householder) poor7(cmb-cpi-nga) FKIND(Kind of Family) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚In a marr‚In a sing‚In a sing‚ Total ‚ied coupl‚le family‚le family‚ ‚e family ‚ with mal‚ with fem‚ ‚ ‚e family ‚ale famil‚ ‚ ‚reference‚y referen‚ ‚ ‚ person ‚ce person‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 0 ‚ 4,859 ‚ 2,927 ‚ 7,785 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 43.7 ‚ 26.3 ‚ 70.1 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 62.4 ‚ 37.6 ‚ ‚ . ‚ 74.8 ‚ 63.4 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 0 ‚ 1,638 ‚ 1,690 ‚ 3,327 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 14.7 ‚ 15.2 ‚ 29.9 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 49.2 ‚ 50.8 ‚ ‚ . ‚ 25.2 ‚ 36.6 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 0 6,496 4,617 11,113 0.0 58.5 41.5 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 85 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table 1 of poor8 by FKIND Controlling for FTYPE=Primary family poor8(msi-ce-ga) FKIND(Kind of Family) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚In a marr‚In a sing‚In a sing‚ Total ‚ied coupl‚le family‚le family‚ ‚e family ‚ with mal‚ with fem‚ ‚ ‚e family ‚ale famil‚ ‚ ‚reference‚y referen‚ ‚ ‚ person ‚ce person‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 169,556 ‚ 10,114 ‚ 28,155 ‚ 207,825 ‚ 73.1 ‚ 4.4 ‚ 12.1 ‚ 89.6 ‚ 81.6 ‚ 4.9 ‚ 13.5 ‚ ‚ 93.4 ‚ 84.9 ‚ 73.4 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 12,068 ‚ 1,796 ‚ 10,220 ‚ 24,084 ‚ 5.2 ‚ 0.8 ‚ 4.4 ‚ 10.4 ‚ 50.1 ‚ 7.5 ‚ 42.4 ‚ ‚ 6.6 ‚ 15.1 ‚ 26.6 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 181,624 11,910 38,375 231,909 78.3 5.1 16.5 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 86 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table 2 of poor8 by FKIND Controlling for FTYPE=Nonfamily householder poor8(msi-ce-ga) FKIND(Kind of Family) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚In a marr‚In a sing‚In a sing‚ Total ‚ied coupl‚le family‚le family‚ ‚e family ‚ with mal‚ with fem‚ ‚ ‚e family ‚ale famil‚ ‚ ‚reference‚y referen‚ ‚ ‚ person ‚ce person‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 0 ‚ 13,207 ‚ 15,109 ‚ 28,316 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 38.3 ‚ 43.8 ‚ 82.0 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 46.6 ‚ 53.4 ‚ ‚ . ‚ 85.8 ‚ 79.0 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 0 ‚ 2,177 ‚ 4,018 ‚ 6,196 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 6.3 ‚ 11.6 ‚ 18.0 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 35.1 ‚ 64.9 ‚ ‚ . ‚ 14.2 ‚ 21.0 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 0 15,384 19,127 34,511 0.0 44.6 55.4 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 87 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table 3 of poor8 by FKIND Controlling for FTYPE=Unrelated subfamily poor8(msi-ce-ga) FKIND(Kind of Family) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚In a marr‚In a sing‚In a sing‚ Total ‚ied coupl‚le family‚le family‚ ‚e family ‚ with mal‚ with fem‚ ‚ ‚e family ‚ale famil‚ ‚ ‚reference‚y referen‚ ‚ ‚ person ‚ce person‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 76 ‚ 104 ‚ 612 ‚ 791 ‚ 5.4 ‚ 7.4 ‚ 43.5 ‚ 56.2 ‚ 9.6 ‚ 13.1 ‚ 77.3 ‚ ‚ 66.1 ‚ 66.8 ‚ 53.8 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 39 ‚ 51 ‚ 526 ‚ 616 ‚ 2.8 ‚ 3.7 ‚ 37.4 ‚ 43.8 ‚ 6.3 ‚ 8.4 ‚ 85.3 ‚ ‚ 33.9 ‚ 33.2 ‚ 46.2 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 114 155 1,138 1,407 8.1 11.0 80.8 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 88 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table 4 of poor8 by FKIND Controlling for FTYPE=Secondary individual (unrelated to householder) poor8(msi-ce-ga) FKIND(Kind of Family) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚In a marr‚In a sing‚In a sing‚ Total ‚ied coupl‚le family‚le family‚ ‚e family ‚ with mal‚ with fem‚ ‚ ‚e family ‚ale famil‚ ‚ ‚reference‚y referen‚ ‚ ‚ person ‚ce person‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 0 ‚ 4,833 ‚ 2,918 ‚ 7,751 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 43.5 ‚ 26.3 ‚ 69.8 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 62.4 ‚ 37.6 ‚ ‚ . ‚ 74.4 ‚ 63.2 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 0 ‚ 1,663 ‚ 1,699 ‚ 3,362 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 15.0 ‚ 15.3 ‚ 30.2 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 49.5 ‚ 50.5 ‚ ‚ . ‚ 25.6 ‚ 36.8 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 0 6,496 4,617 11,113 0.0 58.5 41.5 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 89 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table 1 of poor9 by FKIND Controlling for FTYPE=Primary family poor9(mit-ce-ga) FKIND(Kind of Family) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚In a marr‚In a sing‚In a sing‚ Total ‚ied coupl‚le family‚le family‚ ‚e family ‚ with mal‚ with fem‚ ‚ ‚e family ‚ale famil‚ ‚ ‚reference‚y referen‚ ‚ ‚ person ‚ce person‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 168,868 ‚ 10,034 ‚ 27,626 ‚ 206,528 ‚ 72.8 ‚ 4.3 ‚ 11.9 ‚ 89.1 ‚ 81.8 ‚ 4.9 ‚ 13.4 ‚ ‚ 93.0 ‚ 84.2 ‚ 72.0 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 12,756 ‚ 1,876 ‚ 10,749 ‚ 25,381 ‚ 5.5 ‚ 0.8 ‚ 4.6 ‚ 10.9 ‚ 50.3 ‚ 7.4 ‚ 42.3 ‚ ‚ 7.0 ‚ 15.8 ‚ 28.0 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 181,624 11,910 38,375 231,909 78.3 5.1 16.5 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 90 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table 2 of poor9 by FKIND Controlling for FTYPE=Nonfamily householder poor9(mit-ce-ga) FKIND(Kind of Family) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚In a marr‚In a sing‚In a sing‚ Total ‚ied coupl‚le family‚le family‚ ‚e family ‚ with mal‚ with fem‚ ‚ ‚e family ‚ale famil‚ ‚ ‚reference‚y referen‚ ‚ ‚ person ‚ce person‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 0 ‚ 13,254 ‚ 15,333 ‚ 28,587 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 38.4 ‚ 44.4 ‚ 82.8 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 46.4 ‚ 53.6 ‚ ‚ . ‚ 86.2 ‚ 80.2 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 0 ‚ 2,131 ‚ 3,794 ‚ 5,925 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 6.2 ‚ 11.0 ‚ 17.2 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 36.0 ‚ 64.0 ‚ ‚ . ‚ 13.8 ‚ 19.8 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 0 15,384 19,127 34,511 0.0 44.6 55.4 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 91 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table 3 of poor9 by FKIND Controlling for FTYPE=Unrelated subfamily poor9(mit-ce-ga) FKIND(Kind of Family) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚In a marr‚In a sing‚In a sing‚ Total ‚ied coupl‚le family‚le family‚ ‚e family ‚ with mal‚ with fem‚ ‚ ‚e family ‚ale famil‚ ‚ ‚reference‚y referen‚ ‚ ‚ person ‚ce person‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 76 ‚ 101 ‚ 611 ‚ 787 ‚ 5.4 ‚ 7.2 ‚ 43.4 ‚ 55.9 ‚ 9.6 ‚ 12.8 ‚ 77.6 ‚ ‚ 66.1 ‚ 65.0 ‚ 53.7 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 39 ‚ 54 ‚ 527 ‚ 620 ‚ 2.8 ‚ 3.9 ‚ 37.5 ‚ 44.1 ‚ 6.3 ‚ 8.8 ‚ 85.0 ‚ ‚ 33.9 ‚ 35.0 ‚ 46.3 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 114 155 1,138 1,407 8.1 11.0 80.8 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 92 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table 4 of poor9 by FKIND Controlling for FTYPE=Secondary individual (unrelated to householder) poor9(mit-ce-ga) FKIND(Kind of Family) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚In a marr‚In a sing‚In a sing‚ Total ‚ied coupl‚le family‚le family‚ ‚e family ‚ with mal‚ with fem‚ ‚ ‚e family ‚ale famil‚ ‚ ‚reference‚y referen‚ ‚ ‚ person ‚ce person‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 0 ‚ 4,727 ‚ 2,862 ‚ 7,589 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 42.5 ‚ 25.7 ‚ 68.3 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 62.3 ‚ 37.7 ‚ ‚ . ‚ 72.8 ‚ 62.0 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 0 ‚ 1,769 ‚ 1,755 ‚ 3,524 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 15.9 ‚ 15.8 ‚ 31.7 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 50.2 ‚ 49.8 ‚ ‚ . ‚ 27.2 ‚ 38.0 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 0 6,496 4,617 11,113 0.0 58.5 41.5 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 93 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table 1 of poor10 by FKIND Controlling for FTYPE=Primary family poor10(cmb-ce-ga) FKIND(Kind of Family) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚In a marr‚In a sing‚In a sing‚ Total ‚ied coupl‚le family‚le family‚ ‚e family ‚ with mal‚ with fem‚ ‚ ‚e family ‚ale famil‚ ‚ ‚reference‚y referen‚ ‚ ‚ person ‚ce person‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 168,895 ‚ 10,067 ‚ 27,784 ‚ 206,746 ‚ 72.8 ‚ 4.3 ‚ 12.0 ‚ 89.1 ‚ 81.7 ‚ 4.9 ‚ 13.4 ‚ ‚ 93.0 ‚ 84.5 ‚ 72.4 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 12,730 ‚ 1,843 ‚ 10,591 ‚ 25,163 ‚ 5.5 ‚ 0.8 ‚ 4.6 ‚ 10.9 ‚ 50.6 ‚ 7.3 ‚ 42.1 ‚ ‚ 7.0 ‚ 15.5 ‚ 27.6 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 181,624 11,910 38,375 231,909 78.3 5.1 16.5 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 94 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table 2 of poor10 by FKIND Controlling for FTYPE=Nonfamily householder poor10(cmb-ce-ga) FKIND(Kind of Family) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚In a marr‚In a sing‚In a sing‚ Total ‚ied coupl‚le family‚le family‚ ‚e family ‚ with mal‚ with fem‚ ‚ ‚e family ‚ale famil‚ ‚ ‚reference‚y referen‚ ‚ ‚ person ‚ce person‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 0 ‚ 13,150 ‚ 14,971 ‚ 28,120 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 38.1 ‚ 43.4 ‚ 81.5 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 46.8 ‚ 53.2 ‚ ‚ . ‚ 85.5 ‚ 78.3 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 0 ‚ 2,235 ‚ 4,156 ‚ 6,391 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 6.5 ‚ 12.0 ‚ 18.5 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 35.0 ‚ 65.0 ‚ ‚ . ‚ 14.5 ‚ 21.7 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 0 15,384 19,127 34,511 0.0 44.6 55.4 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 95 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table 3 of poor10 by FKIND Controlling for FTYPE=Unrelated subfamily poor10(cmb-ce-ga) FKIND(Kind of Family) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚In a marr‚In a sing‚In a sing‚ Total ‚ied coupl‚le family‚le family‚ ‚e family ‚ with mal‚ with fem‚ ‚ ‚e family ‚ale famil‚ ‚ ‚reference‚y referen‚ ‚ ‚ person ‚ce person‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 76 ‚ 104 ‚ 604 ‚ 783 ‚ 5.4 ‚ 7.4 ‚ 42.9 ‚ 55.7 ‚ 9.7 ‚ 13.2 ‚ 77.1 ‚ ‚ 66.1 ‚ 66.8 ‚ 53.1 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 39 ‚ 51 ‚ 534 ‚ 624 ‚ 2.8 ‚ 3.7 ‚ 37.9 ‚ 44.3 ‚ 6.2 ‚ 8.3 ‚ 85.5 ‚ ‚ 33.9 ‚ 33.2 ‚ 46.9 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 114 155 1,138 1,407 8.1 11.0 80.8 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 96 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table 4 of poor10 by FKIND Controlling for FTYPE=Secondary individual (unrelated to householder) poor10(cmb-ce-ga) FKIND(Kind of Family) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚In a marr‚In a sing‚In a sing‚ Total ‚ied coupl‚le family‚le family‚ ‚e family ‚ with mal‚ with fem‚ ‚ ‚e family ‚ale famil‚ ‚ ‚reference‚y referen‚ ‚ ‚ person ‚ce person‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 0 ‚ 4,792 ‚ 2,886 ‚ 7,678 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 43.1 ‚ 26.0 ‚ 69.1 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 62.4 ‚ 37.6 ‚ ‚ . ‚ 73.8 ‚ 62.5 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 0 ‚ 1,705 ‚ 1,730 ‚ 3,435 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 15.3 ‚ 15.6 ‚ 30.9 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 49.6 ‚ 50.4 ‚ ‚ . ‚ 26.2 ‚ 37.5 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 0 6,496 4,617 11,113 0.0 58.5 41.5 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 97 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table 1 of poor11 by FKIND Controlling for FTYPE=Primary family poor11(msi-ce-nga) FKIND(Kind of Family) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚In a marr‚In a sing‚In a sing‚ Total ‚ied coupl‚le family‚le family‚ ‚e family ‚ with mal‚ with fem‚ ‚ ‚e family ‚ale famil‚ ‚ ‚reference‚y referen‚ ‚ ‚ person ‚ce person‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 169,512 ‚ 10,182 ‚ 27,885 ‚ 207,579 ‚ 73.1 ‚ 4.4 ‚ 12.0 ‚ 89.5 ‚ 81.7 ‚ 4.9 ‚ 13.4 ‚ ‚ 93.3 ‚ 85.5 ‚ 72.7 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 12,113 ‚ 1,727 ‚ 10,490 ‚ 24,330 ‚ 5.2 ‚ 0.7 ‚ 4.5 ‚ 10.5 ‚ 49.8 ‚ 7.1 ‚ 43.1 ‚ ‚ 6.7 ‚ 14.5 ‚ 27.3 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 181,624 11,910 38,375 231,909 78.3 5.1 16.5 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 98 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table 2 of poor11 by FKIND Controlling for FTYPE=Nonfamily householder poor11(msi-ce-nga) FKIND(Kind of Family) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚In a marr‚In a sing‚In a sing‚ Total ‚ied coupl‚le family‚le family‚ ‚e family ‚ with mal‚ with fem‚ ‚ ‚e family ‚ale famil‚ ‚ ‚reference‚y referen‚ ‚ ‚ person ‚ce person‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 0 ‚ 13,138 ‚ 14,941 ‚ 28,079 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 38.1 ‚ 43.3 ‚ 81.4 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 46.8 ‚ 53.2 ‚ ‚ . ‚ 85.4 ‚ 78.1 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 0 ‚ 2,247 ‚ 4,186 ‚ 6,433 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 6.5 ‚ 12.1 ‚ 18.6 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 34.9 ‚ 65.1 ‚ ‚ . ‚ 14.6 ‚ 21.9 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 0 15,384 19,127 34,511 0.0 44.6 55.4 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands) 99 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table 3 of poor11 by FKIND Controlling for FTYPE=Unrelated subfamily poor11(msi-ce-nga) FKIND(Kind of Family) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚In a marr‚In a sing‚In a sing‚ Total ‚ied coupl‚le family‚le family‚ ‚e family ‚ with mal‚ with fem‚ ‚ ‚e family ‚ale famil‚ ‚ ‚reference‚y referen‚ ‚ ‚ person ‚ce person‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 80 ‚ 104 ‚ 620 ‚ 804 ‚ 5.7 ‚ 7.4 ‚ 44.1 ‚ 57.1 ‚ 9.9 ‚ 13.0 ‚ 77.1 ‚ ‚ 69.5 ‚ 67.1 ‚ 54.5 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 35 ‚ 51 ‚ 518 ‚ 604 ‚ 2.5 ‚ 3.6 ‚ 36.8 ‚ 42.9 ‚ 5.8 ‚ 8.5 ‚ 85.7 ‚ ‚ 30.5 ‚ 32.9 ‚ 45.5 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 114 155 1,138 1,407 8.1 11.0 80.8 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands 100 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table 4 of poor11 by FKIND Controlling for FTYPE=Secondary individual (unrelated to householder) poor11(msi-ce-nga) FKIND(Kind of Family) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚In a marr‚In a sing‚In a sing‚ Total ‚ied coupl‚le family‚le family‚ ‚e family ‚ with mal‚ with fem‚ ‚ ‚e family ‚ale famil‚ ‚ ‚reference‚y referen‚ ‚ ‚ person ‚ce person‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 0 ‚ 4,877 ‚ 2,947 ‚ 7,824 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 43.9 ‚ 26.5 ‚ 70.4 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 62.3 ‚ 37.7 ‚ ‚ . ‚ 75.1 ‚ 63.8 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 0 ‚ 1,619 ‚ 1,670 ‚ 3,289 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 14.6 ‚ 15.0 ‚ 29.6 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 49.2 ‚ 50.8 ‚ ‚ . ‚ 24.9 ‚ 36.2 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 0 6,496 4,617 11,113 0.0 58.5 41.5 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands 101 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table 1 of poor12 by FKIND Controlling for FTYPE=Primary family poor12(mit-ce-nga) FKIND(Kind of Family) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚In a marr‚In a sing‚In a sing‚ Total ‚ied coupl‚le family‚le family‚ ‚e family ‚ with mal‚ with fem‚ ‚ ‚e family ‚ale famil‚ ‚ ‚reference‚y referen‚ ‚ ‚ person ‚ce person‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 168,686 ‚ 10,139 ‚ 27,456 ‚ 206,281 ‚ 72.7 ‚ 4.4 ‚ 11.8 ‚ 88.9 ‚ 81.8 ‚ 4.9 ‚ 13.3 ‚ ‚ 92.9 ‚ 85.1 ‚ 71.5 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 12,938 ‚ 1,770 ‚ 10,919 ‚ 25,628 ‚ 5.6 ‚ 0.8 ‚ 4.7 ‚ 11.1 ‚ 50.5 ‚ 6.9 ‚ 42.6 ‚ ‚ 7.1 ‚ 14.9 ‚ 28.5 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 181,624 11,910 38,375 231,909 78.3 5.1 16.5 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands 102 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table 2 of poor12 by FKIND Controlling for FTYPE=Nonfamily householder poor12(mit-ce-nga) FKIND(Kind of Family) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚In a marr‚In a sing‚In a sing‚ Total ‚ied coupl‚le family‚le family‚ ‚e family ‚ with mal‚ with fem‚ ‚ ‚e family ‚ale famil‚ ‚ ‚reference‚y referen‚ ‚ ‚ person ‚ce person‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 0 ‚ 13,172 ‚ 15,147 ‚ 28,319 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 38.2 ‚ 43.9 ‚ 82.1 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 46.5 ‚ 53.5 ‚ ‚ . ‚ 85.6 ‚ 79.2 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 0 ‚ 2,212 ‚ 3,980 ‚ 6,192 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 6.4 ‚ 11.5 ‚ 17.9 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 35.7 ‚ 64.3 ‚ ‚ . ‚ 14.4 ‚ 20.8 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 0 15,384 19,127 34,511 0.0 44.6 55.4 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands 103 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table 3 of poor12 by FKIND Controlling for FTYPE=Unrelated subfamily poor12(mit-ce-nga) FKIND(Kind of Family) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚In a marr‚In a sing‚In a sing‚ Total ‚ied coupl‚le family‚le family‚ ‚e family ‚ with mal‚ with fem‚ ‚ ‚e family ‚ale famil‚ ‚ ‚reference‚y referen‚ ‚ ‚ person ‚ce person‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 80 ‚ 96 ‚ 604 ‚ 779 ‚ 5.7 ‚ 6.8 ‚ 42.9 ‚ 55.4 ‚ 10.2 ‚ 12.3 ‚ 77.5 ‚ ‚ 69.5 ‚ 61.9 ‚ 53.1 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 35 ‚ 59 ‚ 534 ‚ 628 ‚ 2.5 ‚ 4.2 ‚ 38.0 ‚ 44.6 ‚ 5.6 ‚ 9.4 ‚ 85.0 ‚ ‚ 30.5 ‚ 38.1 ‚ 46.9 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 114 155 1,138 1,407 8.1 11.0 80.8 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands 104 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table 4 of poor12 by FKIND Controlling for FTYPE=Secondary individual (unrelated to householder) poor12(mit-ce-nga) FKIND(Kind of Family) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚In a marr‚In a sing‚In a sing‚ Total ‚ied coupl‚le family‚le family‚ ‚e family ‚ with mal‚ with fem‚ ‚ ‚e family ‚ale famil‚ ‚ ‚reference‚y referen‚ ‚ ‚ person ‚ce person‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 0 ‚ 4,802 ‚ 2,889 ‚ 7,691 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 43.2 ‚ 26.0 ‚ 69.2 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 62.4 ‚ 37.6 ‚ ‚ . ‚ 73.9 ‚ 62.6 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 0 ‚ 1,695 ‚ 1,727 ‚ 3,422 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 15.2 ‚ 15.5 ‚ 30.8 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 49.5 ‚ 50.5 ‚ ‚ . ‚ 26.1 ‚ 37.4 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 0 6,496 4,617 11,113 0.0 58.5 41.5 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands 105 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table 1 of poor13 by FKIND Controlling for FTYPE=Primary family poor13(cmb-ce-nga) FKIND(Kind of Family) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚In a marr‚In a sing‚In a sing‚ Total ‚ied coupl‚le family‚le family‚ ‚e family ‚ with mal‚ with fem‚ ‚ ‚e family ‚ale famil‚ ‚ ‚reference‚y referen‚ ‚ ‚ person ‚ce person‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 168,932 ‚ 10,144 ‚ 27,423 ‚ 206,499 ‚ 72.8 ‚ 4.4 ‚ 11.8 ‚ 89.0 ‚ 81.8 ‚ 4.9 ‚ 13.3 ‚ ‚ 93.0 ‚ 85.2 ‚ 71.5 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 12,693 ‚ 1,766 ‚ 10,952 ‚ 25,411 ‚ 5.5 ‚ 0.8 ‚ 4.7 ‚ 11.0 ‚ 49.9 ‚ 6.9 ‚ 43.1 ‚ ‚ 7.0 ‚ 14.8 ‚ 28.5 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 181,624 11,910 38,375 231,909 78.3 5.1 16.5 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands 106 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table 2 of poor13 by FKIND Controlling for FTYPE=Nonfamily householder poor13(cmb-ce-nga) FKIND(Kind of Family) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚In a marr‚In a sing‚In a sing‚ Total ‚ied coupl‚le family‚le family‚ ‚e family ‚ with mal‚ with fem‚ ‚ ‚e family ‚ale famil‚ ‚ ‚reference‚y referen‚ ‚ ‚ person ‚ce person‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 0 ‚ 13,050 ‚ 14,795 ‚ 27,845 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 37.8 ‚ 42.9 ‚ 80.7 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 46.9 ‚ 53.1 ‚ ‚ . ‚ 84.8 ‚ 77.4 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 0 ‚ 2,334 ‚ 4,332 ‚ 6,666 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 6.8 ‚ 12.6 ‚ 19.3 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 35.0 ‚ 65.0 ‚ ‚ . ‚ 15.2 ‚ 22.6 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 0 15,384 19,127 34,511 0.0 44.6 55.4 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands 107 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table 3 of poor13 by FKIND Controlling for FTYPE=Unrelated subfamily poor13(cmb-ce-nga) FKIND(Kind of Family) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚In a marr‚In a sing‚In a sing‚ Total ‚ied coupl‚le family‚le family‚ ‚e family ‚ with mal‚ with fem‚ ‚ ‚e family ‚ale famil‚ ‚ ‚reference‚y referen‚ ‚ ‚ person ‚ce person‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 80 ‚ 101 ‚ 619 ‚ 799 ‚ 5.7 ‚ 7.2 ‚ 44.0 ‚ 56.8 ‚ 10.0 ‚ 12.6 ‚ 77.4 ‚ ‚ 69.5 ‚ 65.1 ‚ 54.4 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 35 ‚ 54 ‚ 519 ‚ 608 ‚ 2.5 ‚ 3.9 ‚ 36.9 ‚ 43.2 ‚ 5.7 ‚ 8.9 ‚ 85.3 ‚ ‚ 30.5 ‚ 34.9 ‚ 45.6 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 114 155 1,138 1,407 8.1 11.0 80.8 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands 108 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table 4 of poor13 by FKIND Controlling for FTYPE=Secondary individual (unrelated to householder) poor13(cmb-ce-nga) FKIND(Kind of Family) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚In a marr‚In a sing‚In a sing‚ Total ‚ied coupl‚le family‚le family‚ ‚e family ‚ with mal‚ with fem‚ ‚ ‚e family ‚ale famil‚ ‚ ‚reference‚y referen‚ ‚ ‚ person ‚ce person‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 0 ‚ 4,839 ‚ 2,919 ‚ 7,758 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 43.5 ‚ 26.3 ‚ 69.8 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 62.4 ‚ 37.6 ‚ ‚ . ‚ 74.5 ‚ 63.2 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 0 ‚ 1,657 ‚ 1,698 ‚ 3,355 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 14.9 ‚ 15.3 ‚ 30.2 ‚ 0.0 ‚ 49.4 ‚ 50.6 ‚ ‚ . ‚ 25.5 ‚ 36.8 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 0 6,496 4,617 11,113 0.0 58.5 41.5 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands 109 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table of poor1 by HG_REG poor1(official poverty) HG_REG(Region of Residence) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚Northeast‚Midwest ‚South ‚West ‚ Total ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 47,488 ‚ 57,593 ‚ 86,537 ‚ 55,747 ‚ 247,365 ‚ 17.0 ‚ 20.6 ‚ 31.0 ‚ 20.0 ‚ 88.7 ‚ 19.2 ‚ 23.3 ‚ 35.0 ‚ 22.5 ‚ ‚ 89.7 ‚ 90.7 ‚ 87.2 ‚ 88.2 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 5,473 ‚ 5,916 ‚ 12,701 ‚ 7,485 ‚ 31,576 ‚ 2.0 ‚ 2.1 ‚ 4.6 ‚ 2.7 ‚ 11.3 ‚ 17.3 ‚ 18.7 ‚ 40.2 ‚ 23.7 ‚ ‚ 10.3 ‚ 9.3 ‚ 12.8 ‚ 11.8 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 52,961 63,509 99,239 63,232 278,941 19.0 22.8 35.6 22.7 100.0 Table of poor2 by HG_REG poor2(msi-cpi-ga) HG_REG(Region of Residence) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚Northeast‚Midwest ‚South ‚West ‚ Total ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 46,387 ‚ 57,923 ‚ 87,155 ‚ 54,198 ‚ 245,663 ‚ 16.6 ‚ 20.8 ‚ 31.2 ‚ 19.4 ‚ 88.1 ‚ 18.9 ‚ 23.6 ‚ 35.5 ‚ 22.1 ‚ ‚ 87.6 ‚ 91.2 ‚ 87.8 ‚ 85.7 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 6,573 ‚ 5,586 ‚ 12,084 ‚ 9,034 ‚ 33,278 ‚ 2.4 ‚ 2.0 ‚ 4.3 ‚ 3.2 ‚ 11.9 ‚ 19.8 ‚ 16.8 ‚ 36.3 ‚ 27.1 ‚ ‚ 12.4 ‚ 8.8 ‚ 12.2 ‚ 14.3 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 52,961 63,509 99,239 63,232 278,941 19.0 22.8 35.6 22.7 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands 110 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table of poor3 by HG_REG poor3(mit-cpi-ga) HG_REG(Region of Residence) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚Northeast‚Midwest ‚South ‚West ‚ Total ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 46,105 ‚ 57,743 ‚ 86,861 ‚ 53,607 ‚ 244,317 ‚ 16.5 ‚ 20.7 ‚ 31.1 ‚ 19.2 ‚ 87.6 ‚ 18.9 ‚ 23.6 ‚ 35.6 ‚ 21.9 ‚ ‚ 87.1 ‚ 90.9 ‚ 87.5 ‚ 84.8 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 6,856 ‚ 5,766 ‚ 12,377 ‚ 9,625 ‚ 34,624 ‚ 2.5 ‚ 2.1 ‚ 4.4 ‚ 3.5 ‚ 12.4 ‚ 19.8 ‚ 16.7 ‚ 35.7 ‚ 27.8 ‚ ‚ 12.9 ‚ 9.1 ‚ 12.5 ‚ 15.2 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 52,961 63,509 99,239 63,232 278,941 19.0 22.8 35.6 22.7 100.0 Table of poor4 by HG_REG poor4(cmb-cpi-ga) HG_REG(Region of Residence) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚Northeast‚Midwest ‚South ‚West ‚ Total ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 45,814 ‚ 57,685 ‚ 86,711 ‚ 53,671 ‚ 243,881 ‚ 16.4 ‚ 20.7 ‚ 31.1 ‚ 19.2 ‚ 87.4 ‚ 18.8 ‚ 23.7 ‚ 35.6 ‚ 22.0 ‚ ‚ 86.5 ‚ 90.8 ‚ 87.4 ‚ 84.9 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 7,147 ‚ 5,824 ‚ 12,527 ‚ 9,561 ‚ 35,060 ‚ 2.6 ‚ 2.1 ‚ 4.5 ‚ 3.4 ‚ 12.6 ‚ 20.4 ‚ 16.6 ‚ 35.7 ‚ 27.3 ‚ ‚ 13.5 ‚ 9.2 ‚ 12.6 ‚ 15.1 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 52,961 63,509 99,239 63,232 278,941 19.0 22.8 35.6 22.7 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands 111 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table of poor5 by HG_REG poor5(msi-cpi-nga) HG_REG(Region of Residence) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚Northeast‚Midwest ‚South ‚West ‚ Total ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 47,474 ‚ 57,144 ‚ 85,033 ‚ 55,597 ‚ 245,249 ‚ 17.0 ‚ 20.5 ‚ 30.5 ‚ 19.9 ‚ 87.9 ‚ 19.4 ‚ 23.3 ‚ 34.7 ‚ 22.7 ‚ ‚ 89.6 ‚ 90.0 ‚ 85.7 ‚ 87.9 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 5,486 ‚ 6,365 ‚ 14,206 ‚ 7,635 ‚ 33,692 ‚ 2.0 ‚ 2.3 ‚ 5.1 ‚ 2.7 ‚ 12.1 ‚ 16.3 ‚ 18.9 ‚ 42.2 ‚ 22.7 ‚ ‚ 10.4 ‚ 10.0 ‚ 14.3 ‚ 12.1 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 52,961 63,509 99,239 63,232 278,941 19.0 22.8 35.6 22.7 100.0 Table of poor6 by HG_REG poor6(mit-cpi-nga) HG_REG(Region of Residence) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚Northeast‚Midwest ‚South ‚West ‚ Total ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 47,388 ‚ 56,850 ‚ 84,455 ‚ 55,138 ‚ 243,831 ‚ 17.0 ‚ 20.4 ‚ 30.3 ‚ 19.8 ‚ 87.4 ‚ 19.4 ‚ 23.3 ‚ 34.6 ‚ 22.6 ‚ ‚ 89.5 ‚ 89.5 ‚ 85.1 ‚ 87.2 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 5,573 ‚ 6,659 ‚ 14,783 ‚ 8,094 ‚ 35,110 ‚ 2.0 ‚ 2.4 ‚ 5.3 ‚ 2.9 ‚ 12.6 ‚ 15.9 ‚ 19.0 ‚ 42.1 ‚ 23.1 ‚ ‚ 10.5 ‚ 10.5 ‚ 14.9 ‚ 12.8 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 52,961 63,509 99,239 63,232 278,941 19.0 22.8 35.6 22.7 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands 112 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table of poor7 by HG_REG poor7(cmb-cpi-nga) HG_REG(Region of Residence) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚Northeast‚Midwest ‚South ‚West ‚ Total ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 47,197 ‚ 56,787 ‚ 84,313 ‚ 55,070 ‚ 243,368 ‚ 16.9 ‚ 20.4 ‚ 30.2 ‚ 19.7 ‚ 87.2 ‚ 19.4 ‚ 23.3 ‚ 34.6 ‚ 22.6 ‚ ‚ 89.1 ‚ 89.4 ‚ 85.0 ‚ 87.1 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 5,764 ‚ 6,722 ‚ 14,925 ‚ 8,162 ‚ 35,573 ‚ 2.1 ‚ 2.4 ‚ 5.4 ‚ 2.9 ‚ 12.8 ‚ 16.2 ‚ 18.9 ‚ 42.0 ‚ 22.9 ‚ ‚ 10.9 ‚ 10.6 ‚ 15.0 ‚ 12.9 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 52,961 63,509 99,239 63,232 278,941 19.0 22.8 35.6 22.7 100.0 Table of poor8 by HG_REG poor8(msi-ce-ga) HG_REG(Region of Residence) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚Northeast‚Midwest ‚South ‚West ‚ Total ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 46,127 ‚ 57,732 ‚ 86,869 ‚ 53,956 ‚ 244,684 ‚ 16.5 ‚ 20.7 ‚ 31.1 ‚ 19.3 ‚ 87.7 ‚ 18.9 ‚ 23.6 ‚ 35.5 ‚ 22.1 ‚ ‚ 87.1 ‚ 90.9 ‚ 87.5 ‚ 85.3 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 6,834 ‚ 5,777 ‚ 12,370 ‚ 9,276 ‚ 34,257 ‚ 2.4 ‚ 2.1 ‚ 4.4 ‚ 3.3 ‚ 12.3 ‚ 19.9 ‚ 16.9 ‚ 36.1 ‚ 27.1 ‚ ‚ 12.9 ‚ 9.1 ‚ 12.5 ‚ 14.7 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 52,961 63,509 99,239 63,232 278,941 19.0 22.8 35.6 22.7 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands 113 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table of poor9 by HG_REG poor9(mit-ce-ga) HG_REG(Region of Residence) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚Northeast‚Midwest ‚South ‚West ‚ Total ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 45,910 ‚ 57,576 ‚ 86,572 ‚ 53,434 ‚ 243,491 ‚ 16.5 ‚ 20.6 ‚ 31.0 ‚ 19.2 ‚ 87.3 ‚ 18.9 ‚ 23.6 ‚ 35.6 ‚ 21.9 ‚ ‚ 86.7 ‚ 90.7 ‚ 87.2 ‚ 84.5 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 7,051 ‚ 5,934 ‚ 12,667 ‚ 9,798 ‚ 35,450 ‚ 2.5 ‚ 2.1 ‚ 4.5 ‚ 3.5 ‚ 12.7 ‚ 19.9 ‚ 16.7 ‚ 35.7 ‚ 27.6 ‚ ‚ 13.3 ‚ 9.3 ‚ 12.8 ‚ 15.5 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 52,961 63,509 99,239 63,232 278,941 19.0 22.8 35.6 22.7 100.0 Table of poor10 by HG_REG poor10(cmb-ce-ga) HG_REG(Region of Residence) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚Northeast‚Midwest ‚South ‚West ‚ Total ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 45,637 ‚ 57,608 ‚ 86,517 ‚ 53,566 ‚ 243,328 ‚ 16.4 ‚ 20.7 ‚ 31.0 ‚ 19.2 ‚ 87.2 ‚ 18.8 ‚ 23.7 ‚ 35.6 ‚ 22.0 ‚ ‚ 86.2 ‚ 90.7 ‚ 87.2 ‚ 84.7 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 7,324 ‚ 5,901 ‚ 12,722 ‚ 9,666 ‚ 35,613 ‚ 2.6 ‚ 2.1 ‚ 4.6 ‚ 3.5 ‚ 12.8 ‚ 20.6 ‚ 16.6 ‚ 35.7 ‚ 27.1 ‚ ‚ 13.8 ‚ 9.3 ‚ 12.8 ‚ 15.3 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 52,961 63,509 99,239 63,232 278,941 19.0 22.8 35.6 22.7 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands 114 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table of poor11 by HG_REG poor11(msi-ce-nga) HG_REG(Region of Residence) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚Northeast‚Midwest ‚South ‚West ‚ Total ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 47,338 ‚ 56,963 ‚ 84,650 ‚ 55,336 ‚ 244,286 ‚ 17.0 ‚ 20.4 ‚ 30.3 ‚ 19.8 ‚ 87.6 ‚ 19.4 ‚ 23.3 ‚ 34.7 ‚ 22.7 ‚ ‚ 89.4 ‚ 89.7 ‚ 85.3 ‚ 87.5 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 5,623 ‚ 6,546 ‚ 14,589 ‚ 7,896 ‚ 34,655 ‚ 2.0 ‚ 2.3 ‚ 5.2 ‚ 2.8 ‚ 12.4 ‚ 16.2 ‚ 18.9 ‚ 42.1 ‚ 22.8 ‚ ‚ 10.6 ‚ 10.3 ‚ 14.7 ‚ 12.5 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 52,961 63,509 99,239 63,232 278,941 19.0 22.8 35.6 22.7 100.0 Table of poor12 by HG_REG poor12(mit-ce-nga) HG_REG(Region of Residence) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚Northeast‚Midwest ‚South ‚West ‚ Total ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 47,293 ‚ 56,670 ‚ 84,138 ‚ 54,970 ‚ 243,071 ‚ 17.0 ‚ 20.3 ‚ 30.2 ‚ 19.7 ‚ 87.1 ‚ 19.5 ‚ 23.3 ‚ 34.6 ‚ 22.6 ‚ ‚ 89.3 ‚ 89.2 ‚ 84.8 ‚ 86.9 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 5,668 ‚ 6,840 ‚ 15,101 ‚ 8,262 ‚ 35,870 ‚ 2.0 ‚ 2.5 ‚ 5.4 ‚ 3.0 ‚ 12.9 ‚ 15.8 ‚ 19.1 ‚ 42.1 ‚ 23.0 ‚ ‚ 10.7 ‚ 10.8 ‚ 15.2 ‚ 13.1 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 52,961 63,509 99,239 63,232 278,941 19.0 22.8 35.6 22.7 100.0 PERSON POVERTY STATUS FOR ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS by SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS (in thousands 115 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The FREQ Procedure Table of poor13 by HG_REG poor13(cmb-ce-nga) HG_REG(Region of Residence) Frequency‚ Percent ‚ Row Pct ‚ Col Pct ‚Northeast‚Midwest ‚South ‚West ‚ Total ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 0 ‚ 47,101 ‚ 56,686 ‚ 84,142 ‚ 54,973 ‚ 242,902 ‚ 16.9 ‚ 20.3 ‚ 30.2 ‚ 19.7 ‚ 87.1 ‚ 19.4 ‚ 23.3 ‚ 34.6 ‚ 22.6 ‚ ‚ 88.9 ‚ 89.3 ‚ 84.8 ‚ 86.9 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ 1 ‚ 5,860 ‚ 6,823 ‚ 15,097 ‚ 8,259 ‚ 36,039 ‚ 2.1 ‚ 2.4 ‚ 5.4 ‚ 3.0 ‚ 12.9 ‚ 16.3 ‚ 18.9 ‚ 41.9 ‚ 22.9 ‚ ‚ 11.1 ‚ 10.7 ‚ 15.2 ‚ 13.1 ‚ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆ Total 52,961 63,509 99,239 63,232 278,941 19.0 22.8 35.6 22.7 100.0 Contents of 2000 Poverty Research File 116 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The CONTENTS Procedure Data Set Name POVERTY.POVPU00 Observations 217725 Member Type DATA Variables 68 Engine V9 Indexes 0 Created Tuesday, March 31, 2009 04:35:36 PM Observation Length 424 Last Modified Tuesday, March 31, 2009 04:35:36 PM Deleted Observations 0 Protection Compressed NO Data Set Type Sorted NO Label Data Representation WINDOWS_32 Encoding wlatin1 Western (Windows) Engine/Host Dependent Information Data Set Page Size 16384 Number of Data Set Pages 5731 First Data Page 1 Max Obs per Page 38 Obs in First Data Page 15 Number of Data Set Repairs 0 Filename M:\SHARED\COMMON\johncoder\ResearchFile2000\povpu00.sas7bdat Release Created 9.0201M0 Host Created XP_PRO Alphabetic List of Variables and Attributes # Variable Type Len Label 64 A_REORGN Char 2 Person Hispanic Origin 3 FFPOS Char 2 Family Number within Household 11 FHOUSSUB Num 8 Family Value of Housing Rental Subsidy 6 FKIND Char 1 Kind of Family 8 FPERSONS Num 8 Number of Person in the Family 9 FTOTVAL Num 8 Family Money Income 7 FTYPE Char 1 Family Type 4 FWORKERS Char 2 Number of Workers in the Family 10 F_MV_FS Num 8 Family Value of Food Stamps 2 HG_REG Char 1 Region of Residence 13 MARSUPWT Num 8 Person Survey Weight (with 2 decimal places) 61 PPPOS Char 2 Person Sequence Number within Household 63 a_age Num 3 Person Age 62 a_race Num 3 Person Race 66 adwk Num 8 67 agecat Char 20 21 combexpc Num 8 Family Combined Work Related and Child Care Expenses 51 def001 Num 8 cps money income 52 def002 Num 8 definition 1 less taxes plus net capital gains plus noncash benefits 53 def003 Num 8 definition 2 without including housing rental subsidy Contents of 2000 Poverty Research File 117 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The CONTENTS Procedure Alphabetic List of Variables and Attributes # Variable Type Len Label 54 def004 Num 8 definition 3 less child care expenses and moop plus capped housing rental subsidy 55 def005 Num 8 definition 3 less child care expenses plus capped housing rental subsidy 56 def006 Num 8 definition 3 less child care expenses and moop plus capped housing rental subsidy and moopln1 57 def007 Num 8 definition 3 less child care expenses and moop plus capped housing rental subsidy 58 def008 Num 8 definition 3 less child care expenses plus capped housing rental subsidy 59 def009 Num 8 definition 3 less child care expenses and moop plus capped housing rental subsidy and moopln2 65 f96wexp Num 8 Family Total Work Related Expenses 60 famhead Char 1 Person Head of Family 14 fcapgain Num 8 Family Amount of Capital Gains 15 fcaploss Num 8 Family Amount of Capital Losses 19 fengval Num 8 Family Value of LIHEAP Energy Assistance 16 ffedtax Num 8 Family Amount of Federal Income Taxes 17 ffica Num 8 Family Mandatory Payroll Taxes 30 fmrcap Num 8 Family Capped Housing Rental Subsidy Method 1 31 fmrcapce Num 8 Family Capped Housing Rental Subsidy Method 2 22 fmvfsl Num 8 Family Value of Free and Reduced Price School Lunches 23 fmvrsl Num 8 Family Value of Regular Price School Lunches 5 fpovcut Num 4 Offical Poverty Threshold for Family 18 fsttax Num 8 Family Amount of State Income Taxes 24 geo2 Num 8 Geographic Price Adjustement Factor 1 h_seq Char 5 Household Sequence Number 12 hinstat Num 3 Persons Summary Health Insurance Coverage Status 68 marsupth Num 8 32 mooplin1 Num 8 MOOP$MIT1 35 mooplin2 Num 8 MOOP$MIT2 20 newmoop Num 8 Family Out-of-Pocket Medical Expenses 26 nl1 Num 8 3-parameter thresholds updated using CPI-U with geographic price adjustments applied 27 nl2 Num 8 nl1 without geographic price adjustments applied 28 nl3 Num 8 3-parameter thresholds updated using CEX with geographic price adjustments applied 33 nl4 Num 8 3-parameter thresholds (moop in thresholds), updated using CEX with geographic price adjustments applied 36 nl5 Num 8 3-parameter thresholds (moop in thresholds), updated using CEX with geographic price adjustments applied 34 nl6 Num 8 nl4 without geographic price adjustments applied 37 nl7 Num 8 nl5 without geographic price adjustments applied 29 nl8 Num 8 nl3 without geographic price adjustments applied 38 poor1 Num 3 official poverty 39 poor2 Num 3 msi-cpi-ga 40 poor3 Num 3 mit-cpi-ga 41 poor4 Num 3 cmb-cpi-ga Contents of 2000 Poverty Research File 118 16:35 Tuesday, March 31, 2009 The CONTENTS Procedure Alphabetic List of Variables and Attributes # Variable Type Len Label 42 poor5 Num 3 msi-cpi-nga 43 poor6 Num 3 mit-cpi-nga 44 poor7 Num 3 cmb-cpi-nga 45 poor8 Num 3 msi-ce-ga 46 poor9 Num 3 mit-ce-ga 47 poor10 Num 3 cmb-ce-ga 48 poor11 Num 3 msi-ce-nga 49 poor12 Num 3 mit-ce-nga 50 poor13 Num 3 cmb-ce-nga 25 scaleb Num 8 Scale Value for Computing 3-Parameter Poverty Thresholds