Work with interactive mapping tools from across the Census Bureau.
Read briefs and reports from Census Bureau experts.
Watch Census Bureau vignettes, testimonials, and video files.
Read research analyses from Census Bureau experts.
Developer portal to access services and documentation for the Census Bureau's APIs.
Explore Census Bureau data on your mobile device with interactive tools.
Find a multitude of DVDs, CDs and publications in print by topic.
These external sites provide more data.
Download extraction tools to help you get the in-depth data you need.
Explore Census data with interactive visualizations covering a broad range of topics.
Information about the U.S. Census Bureau.
Information about what we do at the U.S. Census Bureau.
Learn about other opportunities to collaborate with us.
Explore the rich historical background of an organization with roots almost as old as the nation.
Explore prospective positions available at the U.S. Census Bureau.
Information about the current field vacancies available at the U.S. Census Bureau Regional Offices.
Discover the latest in Census Bureau data releases, reports, and events.
The Census Bureau's Director writes on how we measure America's people, places and economy.
Find interesting and quirky statistics regarding national celebrations and major events.
Find media toolkits, advisories, and all the latest Census news.
See what's coming up in releases and reports.
Data are obtained from establishments by means of a mail questionnaire or an electronic instrument via the Internet.
The sample for the current release is a continuation of the new sample of establishments that was first implemented in 2010, supplemented with an annual birth sample of newly identified establishments. The sample frame for the new sample was based on the Census Bureau's 2008 Business Register with updated information from the 2007 Economic Census, and this sample frame contained approximately 210,000 manufacturing establishments and 13,000 publishing establishments. Sampling probabilities for the quarterly survey were assigned proportionate to a measure of size that approximated total annual value of shipments. Sample allocation was determined by the priority industry requirements specified by the Federal Reserve Board (FRB), which included the 95 industry groups that are used as publication levels and are comprised predominantly of 4-digit NAICS industries or combinations of NAICS industries. Each of these 95 industry groups was sampled independently to satisfy the total sample size constraint. The sampling procedure ensured that the allocated sample size for each industry group was exactly realized and yielded a sample of approximately 7,500 establishments. The sample is supplemented by the annual birth sample process until the next new sample is selected, which will be when the results of the 2012 Economic Census are available.
The full production utilization rate for an industry is estimated based on those plants in the industry reporting both the actual value of production and the full production estimate. Simple weighted estimates of the two variables are formed by applying the plant’s sample weight to its respective values and adding these weighted values across the reporting plants. The utilization rate for a particular industry group is formed as the ratio of the actual production weighted sum to the full production weighted sum for that given industry. A similar procedure is used to estimate the national emergency production utilization rates, using the actual value of production and the national emergency production estimate.
The average plant hours per week in operation for an industry are estimated based on those plants in the industry reporting plant hours. Simple weighted estimates of the plant hours are formed by applying the plant’s sample weight to its respective values and adding these weighted values across the reporting plants. The average is formed as the ratio of the plant hours weighted sum to the sum of the weights for the reporting plants.
Comparisons between actual and full production by industry are made using various checkbox information that is collected in the survey. This information is collected to determine the primary reasons for changes in full production capability between current quarter and previous quarter, as well as the primary reasons for actual production being less than full production capability for the current quarter. Beginning with 1st-quarter 2013, these data are summarized in the form of weighted proportions for each of the checkbox data items at the 3-digit NAICS level, and historical estimates as far back as 1st-quarter 2008 are available upon request. Each proportion is formed from the QPC sample as the ratio of the weighted number of plants checking the particular checkbox data item to the weighted number of plants checking at least one of the checkbox data items for that particular question. Because plants can check more than one of the checkboxes per question, the sum of these respective weighted proportions for a given 3-digit NAICS industry does not necessarily sum to 100 percent. In addition, for any 3-digit NAICS industry with no reported checkbox data for a particular question, both the estimate and the standard error are shown as zero.
The survey estimates presented in this report are subject to both sampling and nonsampling error. Sampling error is the difference between estimates obtained from the sample and results theoretically obtainable from a comparable complete enumeration of the sampling frame. This error results because only a subset of the sampling frame is measured in a sample survey. Standard errors of the estimates shown in this publication, which are estimated measures of the sampling variability, are displayed along with the corresponding estimates. These standard errors may be used to define confidence intervals about the corresponding estimates with a desired level of confidence. Only one of many possible samples was selected. If confidence intervals were constructed for each of these possible samples, then it would be expected that the percentage of confidence intervals containing the complete coverage result would equal the percent of the level of confidence. For example, the interval defined by a margin of error of one standard error, in which the interval is constructed one standard error below the estimate to one standard error above the estimate, approximately yields a 68-percent confidence interval; the interval defined by a margin of error of two standard errors approximately yields a 95-percent confidence interval; and the interval defined by a margin of error of two and a half standard errors approximately yields a 99-percent confidence interval.
Nonsampling error encompasses all other factors that contribute to the total error of a sample survey estimate. Potential nonsampling errors include various response and operational errors, such as errors during data collection, reporting errors, transcription errors, and bias due to nonresponse. These are all types of errors that could also occur if a complete enumeration had been done under the same conditions as the sample survey. Most of the important operational errors were detected and corrected during the course of reviewing data for reasonableness and consistency. Though nonsampling error is not measured directly, quality control procedures are employed throughout the survey process to minimize this type of error.
[PDF] or denotes a file in Adobe’s Portable Document Format. To view the file, you will need the Adobe® Reader® available free from Adobe. [Excel] or the letters [xls] indicate a document is in the Microsoft® Excel® Spreadsheet Format (XLS). To view the file, you will need the Microsoft® Excel® Viewer available for free from Microsoft®.
This symbol indicates a link to a non-government web site. Our linking to these sites does not constitute an endorsement of any products, services or the information found on them. Once you link to another site you are subject to the policies of the new site.