Table 8 -- Potential Increase in TIGER Coding Rates From ACF Augmentation Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census Internet Release date: June 20, 1997 (numbers in thousands) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | POTENTIALLY CODEABLE BY TIGER | NOT CODEABLE BY TIGER | |---------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------- | | | CODED BY | | | | | | TIGER OR ACF | NOT | | REASON NOT CODEABLE | | |-----------------------| CODED | |---------------------------------------- | TOTAL | | | 1990 | CODED | BY | | NO | NO | | | | | TOTAL | TOTAL | TIGER | BY |TIGER, | TOTAL| HEADER | HOUSE | RURAL | P.O. |OTHERS | | | CODED | CODED | ACF | ACF | | CODE | # | ROUTE | BOX | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105239 85464 67256 51995 15261 18208 19775 180 1189 8546 8049 1811 FOREIGN . . . . . . . . . . . . . 823 0 0 0 0 0 823 0 0 0 0 823 PUERTO RICO . . . . . . . . . 39 0 0 0 0 0 39 0 0 0 0 39 VIRGIN ISLANDS. . . . . . . . 37 0 0 0 0 0 37 0 0 0 0 37 APO/FPO . . . . . . . . . . . 445 0 0 0 0 0 445 0 0 0 0 445 OTHER FOREIGN . . . . . . . . 302 0 0 0 0 0 302 0 0 0 0 302 TOTAL IN USA. . . . . . . . . . . 104416 85464 67256 51995 15261 18208 18952 180 1189 8546 8049 988 MILITARY. . . . . . . . . . . 401 157 27 18 9 130 244 6 10 1 91 136 BY ADDRESS. . . . . . . . 142 9 1 1 0 8 133 0 5 0 52 76 PO NAME = MIL BASE. . . . 9 8 3 2 1 5 1 0 1 0 0 0 ZIP+4 = MIL BASE. . . . . 96 26 2 2 0 24 70 1 4 0 11 54 ZIP = 100% MIL BASE . . . 154 114 21 13 8 93 40 5 0 1 28 6 LATITUDE/LONGITUDE TYPE . . . 376 363 6 3 3 357 13 2 0 0 2 9 TYPE 1'S. . . . . . . . . . . 84866 84241 67188 51945 15243 17053 625 170 77 26 11 341 OLD TYPE 1'S. . . . . . . 84540 83960 67142 51914 15228 16818 580 170 72 25 11 302 DIRECTIONAL PREFIX. . . . 247 210 0 0 0 210 37 0 4 1 0 32 # '# MILE' ADDRESS. . . . 79 71 46 31 15 25 8 0 1 0 0 7 BLANK ADDRESS . . . . . . . . 228 0 0 0 0 0 228 0 0 0 0 228 RURAL ROUTES. . . . . . . . . 9388 231 3 3 0 228 9157 0 460 8376 286 35 NO 'BOX'. . . . . . . . . 1596 126 1 1 0 125 1470 0 243 1124 72 31 WITH 'BOX'. . . . . . . . 7792 105 2 2 0 103 7687 0 217 7252 214 4 OTHER ' RT ' IN ADDRESS . . . 54 10 0 0 0 10 44 0 38 5 0 1 NO 'BOX'. . . . . . . . . 29 9 0 0 0 9 20 0 16 4 0 0 WITH 'BOX'. . . . . . . . 25 1 0 0 0 1 24 0 22 1 0 1 P.O. BOXES. . . . . . . . . . 8005 130 5 5 0 125 7875 1 155 121 7595 3 OTHERS. . . . . . . . . . . . 1098 332 27 21 6 305 766 1 449 17 64 235 Table 8 -- Potential Increase in TIGER Coding Rates From ACF Augmentation - continued (numbers in thousands) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | POTENTIALLY CODEABLE BY TIGER | NOT CODEABLE BY TIGER | |---------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------- | | | CODED BY | | | | | | TIGER OR ACF | NOT | | REASON NOT CODEABLE | | |-----------------------| CODED | |---------------------------------------- | TOTAL | | | 1990 | CODED | BY | | NO | NO | | | | | TOTAL | TOTAL | TIGER | BY |TIGER, | TOTAL| HEADER | HOUSE | RURAL | P.O. |OTHERS | | | CODED | CODED | ACF | ACF | | CODE | # | ROUTE | BOX | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 FOREIGN . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PUERTO RICO . . . . . . . . . 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 VIRGIN ISLANDS. . . . . . . . 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 APO/FPO . . . . . . . . . . . 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 OTHER FOREIGN . . . . . . . . 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTAL IN USA. . . . . . . . . . . 100.0 81.8 64.4 49.8 14.6 17.4 18.2 0.2 1.1 8.2 7.7 0.9 MILITARY. . . . . . . . . . . 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 BY ADDRESS. . . . . . . . 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 PO NAME = MIL BASE. . . . 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ZIP+4 = MIL BASE. . . . . 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 ZIP = 100% MIL BASE . . . 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LATITUDE/LONGITUDE TYPE . . . 0.4 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TYPE 1'S. . . . . . . . . . . 81.3 80.7 64.3 49.7 14.6 16.3 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 OLD TYPE 1'S. . . . . . . 81.0 80.4 64.3 49.7 14.6 16.1 0.6 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 DIRECTIONAL PREFIX. . . . 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 # '# MILE' ADDRESS. . . . 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 BLANK ADDRESS . . . . . . . . 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 RURAL ROUTES. . . . . . . . . 9.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 8.8 0.0 0.4 8.0 0.3 0.0 NO 'BOX'. . . . . . . . . 1.5 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.4 0.0 0.2 1.1 0.1 0.0 WITH 'BOX'. . . . . . . . 7.5 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 7.4 0.0 0.2 6.9 0.2 0.0 OTHER ' RT ' IN ADDRESS . . . 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NO 'BOX'. . . . . . . . . 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 WITH 'BOX'. . . . . . . . 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 P.O. BOXES. . . . . . . . . . 7.7 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 7.5 0.0 0.1 0.1 7.3 0.0 OTHERS. . . . . . . . . . . . 1.1 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.7 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.1 0.2 Table 8 -- Potential Increase in TIGER Coding Rates From ACF Augmentation - continued (numbers in thousands) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | POTENTIALLY CODEABLE BY TIGER | NOT CODEABLE BY TIGER | |---------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------- | | | CODED BY | | | | | | TIGER OR ACF | NOT | | REASON NOT CODEABLE | | |-----------------------| CODED | |---------------------------------------- | TOTAL | | | 1990 | CODED | BY | | NO | NO | | | | | TOTAL | TOTAL | TIGER | BY |TIGER, | TOTAL| HEADER | HOUSE | RURAL | P.O. |OTHERS | | | CODED | CODED | ACF | ACF | | CODE | # | ROUTE | BOX | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- TOTAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 FOREIGN . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PUERTO RICO . . . . . . . . . 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 VIRGIN ISLANDS. . . . . . . . 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 APO/FPO . . . . . . . . . . . 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 OTHER FOREIGN . . . . . . . . 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TOTAL IN USA. . . . . . . . . . . 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MILITARY. . . . . . . . . . . 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 BY ADDRESS. . . . . . . . 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 PO NAME = MIL BASE. . . . 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ZIP+4 = MIL BASE. . . . . 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ZIP = 100% MIL BASE . . . 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 LATITUDE/LONGITUDE TYPE . . . 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 TYPE 1'S. . . . . . . . . . . 100.0 99.3 79.2 61.2 18.0 20.1 0.7 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.4 OLD TYPE 1'S. . . . . . . 99.6 98.9 79.1 61.2 17.9 19.8 0.7 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.4 DIRECTIONAL PREFIX. . . . 0.3 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 # '# MILE' ADDRESS. . . . 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 BLANK ADDRESS . . . . . . . . 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 RURAL ROUTES. . . . . . . . . 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NO 'BOX'. . . . . . . . . 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 WITH 'BOX'. . . . . . . . 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 OTHER ' RT ' IN ADDRESS . . . 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NO 'BOX'. . . . . . . . . 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 WITH 'BOX'. . . . . . . . 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 P.O. BOXES. . . . . . . . . . 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 OTHERS. . . . . . . . . . . . 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Source: 1988 Sample of Income Tax Return Addresses