Table 8. Evaluation of 1990 Final County Estimates: Errors by Method Combination and Use of Single Method Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census Internet Release date: June 20, 1997 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | | | MEASURES OF DIFFERENCE | | |--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Number| Number | Mean | Mean | Weighted | Root Mean | Index of | 50th | | of| of | Algebraic | Absolute | Mean Abso- | Square | Dissimi- | Percentile | 90th METHOD(S) | States| Counties | Percent Error | Percent Error | lute Error | Error | larity | (Median) | Percentile ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADREC Only 2 234 1.7 3.7 2.8 4.9 1.3 2.8 8.3 ADREC & Comp II 3 315 0.0 4.4 2.8 6.2 1.3 3.2 9.6 ADREC & Ratio-Corr. 32 2138 2.2 3.5 2.2 4.7 1.0 2.7 7.0 Ratio-Corr. & Comp II 1 25 -4.7 7.2 4.4 10.1 1.6 5.1 15.7 ADREC, Ratio-Corr., & Comp II 9 279 0.9 3.3 2.2 4.4 1.1 2.6 6.6 ADREC, Ratio-Corr., & Other 3 149 1.8 3.7 2.0 5.1 0.9 2.2 9.4 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SINGLE METHODS COMPARED WITH STATES WITHOUT THE METHOD ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADREC 49 3115 1.8 3.6 2.2 4.9 1.1 2.7 7.3 without 1 25 -4.7 7.2 4.4 10.1 1.6 5.1 15.7 Ratio-Correlation 45 2591 2.0 3.5 2.2 4.8 1.1 2.7 7.1 without 5 549 0.8 4.1 2.8 5.7 1.3 3.0 9.0 Component II 13 619 0.2 4.0 2.5 5.7 1.2 3.0 8.6 without 37 2521 2.1 3.5 2.2 4.8 1.1 2.7 7.2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------