Skip Main Navigation Skip To Navigation Content

Attachment 8

Technical Evaluation Score Sheet

procedures || steps

|| Acquisition Home || Who We Are || Opportunities || Marketing to BOC || Toolkits || Helpful Links || General Info || Feedback ||


Proposal #: _____________________

Evaluator’s Name: ___________________________ Summary Score: _______________

Proposal Offered by: _______________________________
                                    (NAME OF COMPANY)


BACKGROUND

The (INSERT NAME OF AGENCY, DIVISION, BRANCH, ETC.) has a need to procure (INSERT A DESCRIPTION OF THE NEEDED SERVICES/REQUIREMENTS). The offered proposal is in response to the (INSERT NAME OF AGENCY, DIVISION, BRANCH, ETC.)’s (INSERT DATE OF REQUEST) request for proposal.

EVALUATION OF THE PROPOSAL

METHOD OF EVALUATION

Proposals will be evaluated against the requirements of the solicitation and in accordance with the evaluation factors set forth below to determine the demonstrated ability of the Offeror to perform the services required. The evaluator will provide a summary of the strengths, weaknesses, and risk for each factor/sub-factor evaluated.

The evaluator will use the final evaluation sheet to summarize the overall rating awarded the proposal at the consensus meeting. Again, the evaluators will address strengths, weaknesses, and risks.

EVALUATION FACTORS

The technical proposal will be evaluated in relation to the following evaluation factors:

Factor 1: Experience and Capability –

1A. How much experience does the Offeror have in performing this type of contract?

1B. What infrastructure and resources does the Offeror bring to this task order?

1C. What key personnel has the Offeror assigned to this task order, and what are their experience levels?

Strengths:

Deficiencies:

Weaknesses:

Risks:

Questions:

Factor 2: Past Performance

How well has the Offeror documented in its proposal a high level of success in the following business practices?

2A. Offeror’s record of providing high quality services in a timely manner

2B. Standards of good workmanship

2C. Adhering to contract schedules, including the administrative aspects of contract performance

2D. Overall personnel quality, availability, and stability

2E. Reasonable and cooperative behavior

2F. Commitment to and business-like concern for the interests of the customer

2G. Overall program management approach, quality, and capability

2H. Record of awards or performance recognition earned; and overall client satisfaction

Strengths:

Deficiencies:

Weaknesses:

Risks:

Questions:

TECHNICAL EVALUATION SHEETS – BUREAU OF CENSUS TRAVEL MANAGEMENT SERVICES PROPOSAL

Factor  

2A. Evaluate the Offeror’s record of providing high quality services in a timely manner.

2B. Evaluate how the Offeror has complied with travel regulations.

2C. Evaluate the standards of good workmanship the Offeror has supported.

2D. Evaluate how well the Offeror has adhered to contract schedules, including the administrative aspects of contract performance.

2E. Evaluate the overall quality, availability, and stability of the personnel offered by the Offeror.

2F. Evaluate the reasonable and cooperative behavior of the Offeror.

2G. Evaluate the commitment to and business-like concern for the interests of the customer by the Offeror.

2H. Evaluate the overall program management approach, quality, and capability of the Offeror.

2I. Evaluate the record of awards or performance recognition earned; and overall client satisfaction of the services provided by the Offeror.

Strengths:

 

Weaknesses:

 

Risks:

 

Subscore: ___________________ (Fair/Good/Excellent/Outstanding)

TECHNICAL EVALUATION SHEETS – BUREAU OF CENSUS TRAVEL MANAGEMENT SERVICES PROPOSAL

 

SUMMARY SHEET – ALL TECHNICAL FACTORS CONSIDERED

 

Strengths:

 

Weaknesses:

 

Risks:

 

SUMMARY SCORE: ________________ (Fair/Good/Excellent/Outstanding)



Source: U.S. Census Bureau
Acquisition Division

Last Revised: October 15, 2012