Work with interactive mapping tools from across the Census Bureau.
Collection of audio features and sound bites.
The Census Bureau packages data and information into easy-to-understand visuals.
Browse Census Bureau images.
Read briefs and reports from Census Bureau experts.
Watch Census Bureau vignettes, testimonials, and video files.
Read research analyses from Census Bureau experts.
Developer portal to access services and documentation for the Census Bureau's APIs.
Explore Census Bureau data on your mobile device with interactive tools.
Find a multitude of DVDs, CDs and publications in print by topic.
These external sites provide more data.
Download extraction tools to help you get the in-depth data you need.
Explore Census data with interactive visualizations covering a broad range of topics.
How we provide the best mix of timeliness, relevancy, quality, and cost for the data we collect.
Learn about other opportunities to collaborate with us.
Explore the rich historical background of an organization with roots almost as old as the nation.
Explore prospective positions available at the Census Bureau.
Information about the current field vacancies available at the U.S. Census Bureau Regional Offices.
Discover the latest in Census Bureau data releases, reports, and events.
The Census Bureau's Director writes on how we measure America's people, places and economy.
Find interesting and quirky statistics regarding national celebrations and major events.
Listen to audio files on fun facts, historical figures, and celebrations of the month.
Find media toolkits, advisories, and all the latest Census news.
See what's coming up in releases and reports.
KEY WORDS: CENSUS COVERAGE, ETHNOGRAPHIC, RURAL NORTH CAROLINA, WACCAMAW SIOUX, SELF IDENTIFICATION OF RACE, RACIAL CATEGORIES
Dr. Lerch describes how self identification of race was reported in a community recognized as an Indian tribe by the state of North Carolina but not by the Federal government. Causes of coverage error in this rural community were complex. Flexible residential arrangements spread families into physically distinct structures which, situationally, could be classified as separate housing units or merely as extra bedrooms disconnected from the main house. How the boxes into which mail was delivered line up with the locations of associated housing units in the community's rural postal address system was neither consistent nor immediately apparent without tapping into community knowledge. Problems interpreting symbols on the census TIGER map caused minor geocoding errors for both census and alternative enumerators. Some differences between the Alternative Enumeration and the Census Enumeration reflect residential mobility within the sample area and within this densely inter-related kin community.
Citation: Lerch (August 1992) Ethnographic Evaluation of the 1990 Decennial Census Report # 20. Final report for Joint Statistical Agreement 89-25 with the University of North Carolina at Wilmington; September 17, 1992, PREM # 181. Dataset: LER-A NOTE: The North Carolina ethnographic site was one of four where the 1990 Census, an Alternative Enumeration, and the 1990 Post Enumeration Survey (PES-at zero weight) were conducted and compared through a triple match. The author's comments on the triple match of records originating in her Alternative Enumeration to records keyed from census forms and to Post Enumeration Survey records is entitled "A Comparison of the Alternative Enumeration, the Post Enumeration Survey, and the 1990 Census of a Rural Minority Community" and was submitted July 31, 1992. For summary results see Hamid and Brownrigg available on this server.