Work with interactive mapping tools from across the Census Bureau.
Read briefs and reports from Census Bureau experts.
Watch Census Bureau vignettes, testimonials, and video files.
Read research analyses from Census Bureau experts.
Developer portal to access services and documentation for the Census Bureau's APIs.
Explore Census Bureau data on your mobile device with interactive tools.
Find a multitude of DVDs, CDs and publications in print by topic.
These external sites provide more data.
Download extraction tools to help you get the in-depth data you need.
Explore Census data with interactive visualizations covering a broad range of topics.
Information about the U.S. Census Bureau.
Information about what we do at the U.S. Census Bureau.
Learn about other opportunities to collaborate with us.
Explore the rich historical background of an organization with roots almost as old as the nation.
Explore prospective positions available at the U.S. Census Bureau.
Information about the current field vacancies available at the U.S. Census Bureau Regional Offices.
Discover the latest in Census Bureau data releases, reports, and events.
The Census Bureau's Director writes on how we measure America's people, places and economy.
Find interesting and quirky statistics regarding national celebrations and major events.
Find media toolkits, advisories, and all the latest Census news.
See what's coming up in releases and reports.
Response error in longitudinal household surveys has been a continuing and important research topic for SIPP (the U. S. Census Bureau's Survey of Income and Program Participation). As in most surveys, SIPP response errors have been difficult to detect and difficult to reduce once we learn about them.
This paper describes an ambitious project whose goal was to reduce SIPP response error importantly by radically changing the way income data were collected in the interview. The paper covers the changed procedures, the experimental design used to test them, implementation issues, the complex uses of administrative records for estimating errors, the results of the evaluations and how the redesigned SIPP interview will address issues raised in the research.
Results indicate that most households will use personal records in reporting income and that record use can improve the quality of reporting income amounts over time. But the fundamental errors in SIPP income reports are failing to mention entire income sources. The new procedures neither anticipated nor corrected this flaw. Redesigned SIPP will encourage households to use their personal records for reporting income amounts. But we are still unsure how to correct the whole source underreporting problem.