Re-identification Methods for Evaluating the Confidentiality of Analytically Valid Microdata
William E. Winkler
KEY WORDS: re-identification, additive noise
A public-use microdata file should be analytically valid. For a very small number of uses, the microdata should yield analytic results that are approximately the same as the original, confidential file that is not distributed. If the microdata file contains a moderate number of variables and is required to meet a single set of analytic needs of, say, university researchers, then many more records are likely to be re-identified via modern record linkage methods than via the re-identification methods typically used in the confidentiality literataure. This paper compares several masking methods in terms of their ability to produce analytically valid, confidential microdata.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Statistical Research Division
Created: October 3, 2005
Last revised: October 3, 2005
This symbol indicates a link to a non-government web site. Our linking to these sites does not constitute an endorsement of any products, services or the information found on them. Once you link to another site you are subject to the policies of the new site.