Work with interactive mapping tools from across the Census Bureau.
Read briefs and reports from Census Bureau experts.
Watch Census Bureau vignettes, testimonials, and video files.
Read research analyses from Census Bureau experts.
Developer portal to access services and documentation for the Census Bureau's APIs.
Explore Census Bureau data on your mobile device with interactive tools.
Find a multitude of DVDs, CDs and publications in print by topic.
These external sites provide more data.
Download extraction tools to help you get the in-depth data you need.
Explore Census data with interactive visualizations covering a broad range of topics.
Information about the U.S. Census Bureau.
Information about what we do at the U.S. Census Bureau.
Learn about other opportunities to collaborate with us.
Explore the rich historical background of an organization with roots almost as old as the nation.
Explore prospective positions available at the U.S. Census Bureau.
Information about the current field vacancies available at the U.S. Census Bureau Regional Offices.
Discover the latest in Census Bureau data releases, reports, and events.
The Census Bureau's Director writes on how we measure America's people, places and economy.
Find interesting and quirky statistics regarding national celebrations and major events.
Find media toolkits, advisories, and all the latest Census news.
See what's coming up in releases and reports.
The objective of the research described in this paper was to develop and improve a Nonresponse Followup (NRFU) instrument for the 2010 U.S. Census. This research is unique in that multiple pretesting methods were used in the development of a single instrument in two different languages: English and Spanish.
The NRFU instrument was originally developed and tested as a computer-assisted personal interview (CAPI) instrument. The U.S. Census Bureau’s NRFU operation is critical to gathering data from both English- and Spanish-speaking households who do not return their self-administered census forms. The instrument was developed using a series of pretesting methods, including usability and cognitive testing, behavior coding, and an observational study of the administration of test versions of both the English and Spanish instruments. Though many of the questions had already been tested in the context of a self-administered paper form, this was the first time pretesting was conducted using the interviewer-administered questions as they were scripted to be read from a CAPI instrument.
This paper discusses overarching results of three rounds of English cognitive testing, two rounds of Spanish cognitive testing, two rounds of usability testing in both languages, two rounds of behavior coding of the instrument in both languages, and an observational study of the administration of the NRFU interview in the field in both languages. The application of mixed pretesting methods to the development of one survey instrument is an all-too-uncommon situation. This paper presents lessons learned about the types of findings made possible by the different pretesting methods, and offers the unique opportunity to examine issues of equivalency between a source and a translated version of a survey instrument through multiple measures.
This symbol indicates a link to a non-government web site. Our linking to these sites does not constitute an endorsement of any products, services or the information found on them. Once you link to another site you are subject to the policies of the new site.