An administrative record check of program participation reporting in the first two SIPP interviews shows that, while response errors are rare, they have important biasing effects on estimates of means and correlations. Our search for models of the causes of the errors includes classical hypotheses about forgetting, memory decay, confusion about name attributes, telescoping, learning to underreport, interviewers, and proxy responses. While these hypotheses give occasional insights into isolated error problems, they do not provide a fundamental understanding of the error dynamics. We mention some exploratory cognitive research that may provide the broader understanding and may be useful in devising better measurement procedures.
CITATION: Marquis, Kent H. and Jeffrey C. Moore. (2010). Measurement Errors in SIPP Program Reports. Statistical Research Division Research Report Series (Survey Methodology #2010-01). U.S. Census Bureau. Available online at <http://www.census.gov/srd/papers/pdf/rsm2010-01.pdf>.
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Statistical Research Division
Published online: January 14, 2010
Last revised: June 1990
This symbol indicates a link to a non-government web site. Our linking to these sites does not constitute an endorsement of any products, services or the information found on them. Once you link to another site you are subject to the policies of the new site.