Work with interactive mapping tools from across the Census Bureau.
Collection of audio features and sound bites.
The Census Bureau packages data and information into easy-to-understand visuals.
Browse Census Bureau images.
Read briefs and reports from Census Bureau experts.
Watch Census Bureau vignettes, testimonials, and video files.
Read research analyses from Census Bureau experts.
Developer portal to access services and documentation for the Census Bureau's APIs.
Explore Census Bureau data on your mobile device with interactive tools.
Find a multitude of DVDs, CDs and publications in print by topic.
These external sites provide more data.
Download extraction tools to help you get the in-depth data you need.
Explore Census data with interactive visualizations covering a broad range of topics.
How we provide the best mix of timeliness, relevancy, quality, and cost for the data we collect.
Learn about other opportunities to collaborate with us.
Explore the rich historical background of an organization with roots almost as old as the nation.
Explore prospective positions available at the Census Bureau.
Information about the current field vacancies available at the U.S. Census Bureau Regional Offices.
Discover the latest in Census Bureau data releases, reports, and events.
The Census Bureau's Director writes on how we measure America's people, places and economy.
Find interesting and quirky statistics regarding national celebrations and major events.
Listen to audio files on fun facts, historical figures, and celebrations of the month.
Find media toolkits, advisories, and all the latest Census news.
See what's coming up in releases and reports.
To save time and money, and reduce nonresponse, survey practitioners often opt to accept some data from proxies, who report for and about sample persons unavailable, unable, or unwilling to self-respond. The common assumption is that the benefits of allowing proxy reporting are bought at the expense of data quality. The survey methods literature, however, yields little convincing evidence that proxy data are usually more contaminated with measurement error than data obtained from self-respondents (Moore, 1988).
This paper examines and compares the measurement error properties of self- and proxy reports of government transfer program participation from the U.S. Census Bureau’s Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP). Although the nonexperimental design of the evaluation poses analytical difficulties, the criterion administrative record data permit a direct assessment of error. The results provide only very weak support for the common wisdom. The measurement error advantage of self-respondents is generally small (and for one type of error may even be reversed), and attempts to identify response circumstances which might prove especially detrimental to proxy reporting also fail to produce consistent or dramatic effects. Rather than any self/proxy differences, the far more compelling feature of the data is the high level of underreporting error for all types of respondents in their reports of monthly program participation and month-to-month participation change.
Moore, Jeffrey C. (2010). Proxy Reports: Results from a Record Check Study. Statistical Research Division Research Report Series (Survey Methodology #2010-09). U.S. Census Bureau. Available online at <http://www.census.gov/srd/papers/pdf/rsm2010-09.pdf>.