Work with interactive mapping tools from across the Census Bureau.
Read briefs and reports from Census Bureau experts.
Watch Census Bureau vignettes, testimonials, and video files.
Read research analyses from Census Bureau experts.
Developer portal to access services and documentation for the Census Bureau's APIs.
Explore Census Bureau data on your mobile device with interactive tools.
Find a multitude of DVDs, CDs and publications in print by topic.
These external sites provide more data.
Download extraction tools to help you get the in-depth data you need.
Explore Census data with interactive visualizations covering a broad range of topics.
Information about the U.S. Census Bureau.
Information about what we do at the U.S. Census Bureau.
Learn about other opportunities to collaborate with us.
Explore the rich historical background of an organization with roots almost as old as the nation.
Explore prospective positions available at the U.S. Census Bureau.
Information about the current field vacancies available at the U.S. Census Bureau Regional Offices.
Discover the latest in Census Bureau data releases, reports, and events.
The Census Bureau's Director writes on how we measure America's people, places and economy.
Find interesting and quirky statistics regarding national celebrations and major events.
Find media toolkits, advisories, and all the latest Census news.
See what's coming up in releases and reports.
In 2008, an initial field test was conducted to determine whether the Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP) could be conducted using Event History Calendar (EHC) methodology (administered once per year), and still produce data of equal (or better) quality compared to the data collected using a conventional “standardized” questionnaire administered every four months, as is SIPP’s current practice. A paper-and-pencil field test was conducted in April through June in two sites – Illinois and Texas – and collected data covering the 2007 calendar year. The prototype EHC instrument contained a small subset of SIPP content, focusing on need-based government transfer programs such as Food Stamps. Interviewers completed 1,627 in-person household interviews for a unit-level response rate of approximately 91%.
Several evaluation methods are being employed to assess the results. Data derived from the EHC will be compared to production SIPP data collected from the same people for the same time period (that is, the SIPP 2004 panel, Waves 10-12). Both EHC and SIPP data will also be compared to administrative records where possible. Respondent and field representative (FR) debriefing forms were administered at the time of each interview, and a report of those results is currently in preparation. Observers were dispatched to observe live interviews and report on their experiences. A paper summarizing the observers’ reports has been completed and is available at http://www.census.gov/srd/papers/pdf/ssm2008-16.pdf. Finally, after all interviewing activities were completed, focus groups were conducted with FRs in both sites to glean more about their experiences with the EHC field test. This report presents findings from the focus groups.
Topics covered included gaining cooperation, navigating the flow of the EHC and recording answers, managing both scripted and unscripted questions, the landmark events section, and training (see Appendix A for the Focus Group Talking Points). Each focus group lasted approximately two hours. Attempts were made to conduct the focus groups soon after the interviewing was completed, and to keep groups rather small (under 10 people) but due to scheduling constraints some compromises had to be made. Only one session could be held in the Dallas Regional Office (RO). The group included 13 FRs and three Supervisory FRs and the session was held on May 13, 2008. On July 10, 2008, two smaller sessions were held in the Chicago RO with eight FRs in the morning session and nine FRs in the afternoon session. The Texas group included FRs from each of four sites (Austin, Dallas-Fort Worth, Houston and San Antonio). Participants in the Chicago groups were determined by assignment area; one group was comprised of FRs whose assignments were in Chicago, and the other of FRs with assignments outside Chicago.
Below is a composite summary of comments across all three groups. The first section (Part A) summarizes interviewers’ comments about general preparation for and administration of the EHC. Part B presents a section-by-section summary of results (note if a given section is not listed it means FRs had no noteworthy comments). Part C concludes with comments on features particular to the EHC interviewing technique.
This symbol indicates a link to a non-government web site. Our linking to these sites does not constitute an endorsement of any products, services or the information found on them. Once you link to another site you are subject to the policies of the new site.