Skip header section
US Census Bureau
People Business Geography Newsroom Subjects A to Z Search@Census
 

Investigating Quarterly Trading Day Effects

Kathleen M. McDonald-Johnson(1), David F. Findley(2), and Erica Cepietz(3)

ABSTRACT:

When the U. S. Census Bureau began looking into seasonal adjustment of the Quarterly Services Survey series, one question was whether trading day adjustments were reasonable. The series started in the fourth quarter of 2003, and consideration of trading day adjustments began when series had only 17 quarters of data. Beyond concern over series length, however, we questioned more generally whether trading day effects are measurable in quarterly series. To answer our questions, we started with monthly Census Bureau series known to have significant trading day effects. We summed to quarterly levels and tested for significance. We tested using both real and simulated effects. This paper discusses the results of our research.

KEYWORDS:

seasonal adjustment, simulated data, time series




[PDF] or PDF denotes a file in Adobe’s Portable Document Format. To view the file, you will need the Adobe® Acrobat® Reader This link to a non-federal Web site does not imply endorsement of any particular product, company, or content. available free from Adobe. Link to a non-federal Web site



(1) Kathleen M. McDonald-Johnson is Mathematical Statistican, Office of Statistical Methods and Research for Economic Programs, U. S. Census Bureau, 4600 Silver Hill Road, Washington, DC 20233. email : kathleen.m.mcdonald.johnson@census.gov

(2) David F. Findley is formerly the Senior Mathematical Statistican for Time Series and now a consultant, U. S. Census Bureau, 4600 Silver Hill Road, Washington, DC 20233. email : david.f.findley@census.gov

(3) Erica Cepietz is is Mathematical Statistican, Decennial Statistical Studies Division, U. S. Census Bureau, 4600 Silver Hill Road, Washington, DC 20233. email : erica.cepietz@census.gov