Introducing a new way to navigate by topics. Access the latest news, data, publications and more around topics of interest.
Our population statistics cover age, sex, race, Hispanic origin, migration, ancestry, language use, veterans, as well as population estimates and projections.
This section provides information on a range of educational topics, from educational attainment and school enrollment to school districts, costs and financing.
We measure the state of the nations workforce, including employment and unemployment levels, weeks and hours worked, occupations, and commuting.
Our statistics highlight trends in household and family composition, describe characteristics of the residents of housing units, and show how they are related.
Health statistics on insurance coverage, disability, fertility and other health issues are increasingly important in measuring the nation's overall well-being.
We measure the housing and construction industry, track homeownership rates, and produce statistics on the physical and financial characteristics of our homes.
The U.S. Census Bureau is the official source for U.S. export and import statistics and regulations governing the reporting of exports from the U.S.
The U.S. Census Bureau provides data for the Federal, state and local governments as well as voting, redistricting, apportionment and congressional affairs.
Search an alphabetical index of keywords and phrases to access Census Bureau statistics, publications, products, services, data, and data tools.
Geography provides the framework for Census Bureau survey design, sample selection, data collection, tabulation, and dissemination.
Geography is central to the work of the Bureau, providing the framework for survey design, sample selection, data collection, tabulation, and dissemination.
Find resources on how to use geographic data and products with statistical data, educational blog postings, and presentations.
The Geographic Support System Initiative will integrate improved address coverage, spatial feature updates, and enhanced quality assessment and measurement.
Work with interactive mapping tools from across the Census Bureau.
Find geographic data and products such as Shapefiles, KMLs, TIGERweb, boundary files, geographic relationship files, and reference and thematic maps.
Metropolitan and micropolitan areas are geographic entities used by Federal statistical agencies in collecting, tabulating, and publishing Federal statistics.
Find information about specific partnership programs and learn more about our partnerships with other organizations.
Definitions of geographic terms, why geographic areas are defined, and how the Census Bureau defines geographic areas.
We conduct research on geographic topics such as how to define geographic areas and how geography changes over time.
Visit our library of Census Bureau multimedia files. Collection formats include audio, video, mobile apps, images, and publications.
Collection of audio features and sound bites.
The Census Bureau packages data and information into easy-to-understand visuals.
Browse Census Bureau images.
Read briefs and reports from Census Bureau experts.
Watch Census Bureau vignettes, testimonials, and video files.
Read research analyses from Census Bureau experts.
Access data through products and tools including data visualizations, mobile apps, interactive web apps and other software.
Developer portal to access services and documentation for the Census Bureau's APIs.
Explore Census Bureau data on your mobile device with interactive tools.
Find a multitude of DVDs, CDs and publications in print by topic.
These external sites provide more data.
Download extraction tools to help you get the in-depth data you need.
Learn more about our data from this collection of e-tutorials, presentations, webinars and other training materials. Sign up for training sessions.
Explore Census data with interactive visualizations covering a broad range of topics.
Learn how we serve the public as the most reliable source of data about the nation's people and economy.
How we provide the best mix of timeliness, relevancy, quality, and cost for the data we collect.
Our researchers explore innovative ways to conduct surveys, increase respondent participation, reduce costs, and improve accuracy.
Our surveys provide periodic and comprehensive statistics about the nation, critical for government programs, policies, and decisionmaking.
Learn about other opportunities to collaborate with us.
Explore the rich historical background of an organization with roots almost as old as the nation.
Explore prospective positions available at the Census Bureau.
Explore Census programs targeted for particular needs.
Discover the latest in Census Bureau data releases, reports, and events.
The Census Bureau's Director writes on how we measure America's people, places and economy.
Find interesting and quirky statistics regarding national celebrations and major events.
Listen to audio files on fun facts, historical figures, and celebrations of the month.
Find media toolkits, advisories, and all the latest Census news.
See what's coming up in releases and reports.
The Manufacturing and Construction Division (MCD) conducted a State and Local Undercoverage Evaluation (SLUE) study to evaluate the State and Local (S&L) Value- Put-in-Place (VIP) frame and derive up-to-date undercoverage adjustment factors.
In evaluating the S&L VIP frame, a list of projects from an independent source was needed. Because such a list was not readily available, we had to survey S&L government agencies to acquire the information. We selected 4,026 S&L government agencies from a sample of 16,986 agencies in the Annual Survey of Government Finances (ASGF). The agencies from the ASGF were stratified by types of construction (TCs) and weighted expenditures. They were subsampled using stratified systematic sampling with unequal probabilities.
We utilized a mailout/mailback strategy with telephone follow-up (TFU) to collect data from the agencies. Forms were mailed to the S&L agencies in two separate waves, three months apart. The first wave was mailed out July 1, 2004 asking for contracts awarded for construction projects and force account work started during April, May, and June 2004. The second wave was mailed out October 1, 2004 asking for contracts awarded for construction projects and force account work started during July, August, and September 2004. Each agency was asked to list all contracts awarded for construction projects at $75,000 or more during a given quarter; and total amounts for contracts less than $75,000 and force account projects. The information requested was contract award date, project description, physical location of project, name of general contractor, and the contract value.
To minimize respondents’ burden, different reporting modes were offered to the agencies: mail back, fax back, email back, or phone in. We conducted TFU for nonresponse or delinquent cases immediately after all returned forms were keyed. The total duration of the data collection for SLUE expanded over a nine-month period: from July 2004 to March 2005 with an overall unweighted response rate of 73 percent.
To reduce the workload for the matching and verification of the matches, we subsampled 2,098 contracts from 6,845 contracts (valued at $75,000 or more) that were awarded for construction projects and reported to us by SLUE respondents. These contracts were selected using stratified systematic sampling with unequal probabilities. The contracts were stratified according to their TCs, contract values, and regions. The probabilities of selection were based on the number of contracts reported for each TC.
The matching of contracts from SLUE to those projects in the frame that were used to produce the monthly S&L VIP estimates was done by McGraw-Hill Construction (MHC) over an eight-month period. MCD sent 2,098 projects/contracts (projects and contracts are equivalent) with values at $75,000 or more to MHC. MHC matched these projects to their database(s) and we verified their findings. Any “questionable” matches that arose within the first six months of the matching operation were sent back to MHC for further 2 research. No matching was done for force account projects and projects less than $75,000.
MHC reports were found for 67 percent of the 2,023 (75 contracts were out-of-scope) SLUE contracts. These matches represented 83 percent of the weighted value of all contracts awarded in two quarters. In general, MHC coverage was better for large projects than for small projects.
Beginning with the 2007 annual revision of the VIP series, all S&L VIP series will be adjusted using factors derived from the SLUE study. The adjustment will be done on a monthly basis using the factors shown below:
Type of Construction
Sewer and Water
Housing and Hotel/motel
We will also adjust the S&L VIP historical series back to January 1993 with these factors.
[PDF] or denotes a file in Adobe’s Portable Document Format. To view the file, you will need the Adobe® Reader® available free from Adobe. [Excel] or the letters [xls] indicate a document is in the Microsoft® Excel® Spreadsheet Format (XLS). To view the file, you will need the Microsoft® Excel® Viewer available for free from Microsoft®.
This symbol indicates a link to a non-government web site. Our linking to these sites does not constitute an endorsement of any products, services or the information found on them. Once you link to another site you are subject to the policies of the new site.