Topics

Data & Maps

Surveys & Programs

Resource Library

Partners Researchers Educators Survey Respondents

News NAICS Codes Jobs About Us Contact Us Help

View All Topics and Subtopics Index A to Z

Age and Sex Business and Economy Education Emergency Management / Disasters Employment Families and Living Arrangements Geography Health Hispanic Origin Housing Income and Poverty International Trade Migration/Geographic Mobility Population Population Estimates Public Sector Race Redistricting Research Voting and Registration

Explore data on data.census.gov View all data resources

Census Academy Combining Data Data Equity Tools Data Tools and Apps Datasets Developers Experimental Data Products Interactive Maps Mapping Files Profiles Related Sites Software Tables Training and Workshops Visualizations

Survey Help View all Surveys & Programs

2020 Census 2030 Census American Community Survey (ACS) American Housing Survey (AHS) Annual Business Survey (ABS) Annual Integrated Economic Survey (AIES) Census of Governments County Business Patterns (CBP) Current Population Survey (CPS) Economic Census Household Pulse Survey International Programs Metro and Micro Areas Population Estimates Population Projections Small Area Income and Poverty Statistics of U.S. Businesses Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP)

View all library resources Glossary

America Counts: Stories Audio Blogs By the Numbers Facts for Features Fact Sheets Infographics and Visualizations Photos Publications Spotlights Stats for Stories Training (Census Academy) Videos Working Papers

Executive Steering Committee for Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Policy (ESCAP) — March 2001 Recommendation

Skip Navigation

Executive Steering Committee for Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Policy (ESCAP) — March 2001 Recommendation

March 2001

Review the report on adjustment prepared by the Executive Steering Committee for Accuracy & Coverage Evaluation Policy (ESCAP).

Recommendation on Adjustment of Census Counts [<1.0 MB]

Top of Section

Recommendation Concerning the Methodology to be Used in Producing the Tabulations of Population Reported to States and Localities Pursuant to 13 U.S.C. 141(c) [2.2 MB]

Top of Section

A.C.E. Review

B-1*, Data and Analysis to Inform the ESCAP Report (Final Report) [3.2 MB]

This report seeks to summarize the data and analysis presented to ESCAP either through the "BSeries,'' or through discussions and presentations.

B-2*, Quality Indicators of Census 2000 and the Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation (Final Report) [1.8 MB]

This report summarizes some overall quality indicators of Census 2000 and the Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation.

B-3*, Quality of Census 2000 Processes (Final Report) [2.3 MB]

This report focuses on the quality of selected Census 2000 processes.

B-4*, Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Survey: Demographic Analysis Results (Final Report) [2.3 MB]

This report focuses on the consistency of the A.C.E. results with findings based on Demographic Analysis (DA).

B-5*, Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation: Person Interviewing Results (Final Report) [3.0 MB]

This report presents detailed information on the results of the Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Survey person interview operation.

B-6*, Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation: Person Matching and Follow-up Results (Final Report) [2.6 MB]

This report focuses on the person matching and follow-up results.

B-7*, Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation: Missing Data Results (Final Report) [3.2 MB]

This report focuses on the extent and effects of missing data in the P and E Samples of the Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation (A.C.E.).

B-8*, Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation: Decomposition of Dual System Estimate Components (Final Report) [2.7 MB]

This report focuses on the decomposition of the P-sample and E-sample dual system estimate components.

B-9*, Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation: Dual System Estimation Results (Final Report) [4.7 MB]

This report focuses on the summary results of the dual system estimates and the coverage correction factors.

B-10*, Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation: Consistency of Post-Stratification Variables (Final Report) [2.0 MB]

This report focuses on the consistency of post-stratification variables between the P sample and E sample.

B-11*, Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation: Variance Estimates by Size of Geographic Area (Final Report) [<1.0 MB]

This report focuses mainly on distributions of coefficients of variation of A.C.E. small-area estimates.

B-12*, Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation: Correlation Bias (Final Report) [<1.0 MB]

This report focuses on investigation and estimation of correlation bias in A.C.E. dual system estimates by comparing them to results from demographic analysis.

B-13*, Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation: Comparing Accuracy (Final Report) [<1.0 MB]

This report summarizes loss function analysis results comparing the accuracy of Census 2000 and the Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation.

B-14*, Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation: Assessment of Synthetic Assumption (Final Report) [1.4 MB]

This report focuses on the Synthetic Assumptions for the 2000 Census Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Survey.

B-15*, Census 2000 — Service Based Enumeration Multiplicity Estimation (Final Report) [<1.0 MB]

Th.is report focuses on the Service Based Enumeration (SBE) Multiplicity Estimation.

B-16*, Demographic Full Count Review: 100% Data Files and Products (Final Report) [1.6 MB]

This report summarizes the Demographic Full Count Revievv· program for 100% data files and products.

B-17*, Census 2000 — Missing Housing Unit Status and Population Data (Final Report) [<1.0 MB]

This report focuses on missing data in the 2000 Census.

B-18*, Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation: Effect of Targeted Extended Search (Final Report) [<1.0 MB]

The report focuses on the effects of the Targeted Extended Search (TES) operation and its effect on the components of the Dual System Estimates.

B-19*, Overview of Total Error Modeling and Loss Function Analysis (Final Report) [2.2 MB]

This report focuses on the methodology and assumptions used to assess total error and to compare uncorrected Census 2000 counts with corrected estimates.

Additional document

Q-43, Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Survey: Effect of Excluding "Late Census Adds" [<1.0 MB]

The discussion will focus on the effect of these removed cases on the A.C.E. expected value, in order to discuss any possible effect on bias.

Top of Section

Volume 1: Overview [15 MB]

Volume 2: Sampling [22 MB]

Volume 3: Estimation [8.1 MB]

Volume 4: 1999 Joint Statistical Meetings (JSM) Papers on Census 2000 [20 MB]

Volume 5: Quality Assurance [13 MB]

Top of Section

ESCAP Meetings 1 - 3 [14 MB]

ESCAP Meetings 4 - 6 [22 MB]

ESCAP Meetings 7 - 23 [2.3 MB]

ESCAP Meetings 24 - 36 [11 MB]

ESCAP Meetings 37 - 46 [16 MB]

Additional Document

The Executive Steering Committee for A.C.E. Policy (ESCAP) Supporting Documents [<1.0 MB]

Top of Section

B-1, Data and Analysis to Inform the ESCAP Recommendation (Prototype) [1.6 MB]

B-2, Overall Census and A.C.E. Quality Indicators (Prototype) [<1.0 MB]

B-3, Quality of Census 2000 Processes (Prototype) [1.7 MB]

B-4, Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Survey: Demographic Analysis Results (Prototype) [<1.0 MB]

B-5, Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Survey: Person Interviewing Results (Prototype) [1.1 MB]

B-6, Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Survey: Person Matching and Follow-up Results (Prototype) [1.6 MB]

B-7, Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Survey: Missing Data Results (Prototype) [2.0 MB]

B-8, Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Survey: Decomposition of Dual System Estimate Components (Prototype) [1.2 MB]

B-9, Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Survey: Dual System Estimation Results (Prototype) [<1.0 MB]

B-10, Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Survey: Consistency of Post-Stratification Variables (Prototype) [<1.0 MB]

B-11, Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Survey: Variance Estimates by Size of Geographic Area (Prototype) [<1.0 MB]

B-12, Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Survey: Correlation Bias (Prototype) [<1.0 MB]

B-13, Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Survey: Comparing Accuracy (Proposal) [<1.0 MB]

B-14, Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Survey: Synthetic Assumptions (Proposal) [<1.0 MB]

B-15, Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Survey: Contributions of Service Based Enumeration Multiplicity Estimation to Corrected Census Results (Prototype) [<1.0 MB]

B-16, Demographic Full Count Review Report (Prototype) [<1.0 MB]

Additional Information

Additional information: Norwood, Janet L., Chair, National Academy of Sciences Panel to Review the 2000 Census.

Letter to Kenneth Prewitt, U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, 9 November 2000, about the October 2, 2000 presentation to the National Academy of Sciences [<1.0 MB]

Top of Section

Federal Regulation (final rule)

The new rule was published in the Federal Register on February 23, 2001.

Federal Regulation (final rule)

The final rule was published in the Federal Register on October 6, 2000.

Federal Regulation (proposed rule)

The proposed rule was published in the Federal Register on June 20, 2000.

Federal Regulation — Comments

1. 06/27/00 - David Mingay, Ph.D., University of Chicago [<1.0 MB]

2. 06/28/00 - Max Larsen, Ph.D., Gallup Organization [<1.0 MB]

3. 07/05/00 - David Seiders, National Assoc. Home Builders [<1.0 MB]

4. 07/10/00 - David Featherman, ISR [<1.0 MB]

5. 07/13/00 - Mary Batcher, Washington Statistical Society [<1.0 MB]

6. 07/13/00 - David Hess, COSSA [<1.0 MB]

7. 07/13/00 - Murray Edelman, Ph.D., AAPOR [<1.0 MB]

8. 07/13/00 - U.S. House of Representatives 27 co-signatories from California [<1.0 MB]

9. 07/14/00 - AFGE, AFL - CIO [<1.0 MB]

10. 07/25/00 - U.S. House of Representatives 42 co-signatories [<1.0 MB]

11. 07/27/00 - Sen. Martin Connor, New York State Senate [<1.0 MB]

12. 07/27/00 - Former Directors of the Census Bureau [<1.0 MB]

13. 07/27/00 - John Engler, Governor of Michigan [<1.0 MB]

14. 07/31/00 - Leadership Conference on Civil Rights [<1.0 MB]

15. 08/02/00 - Robert Koyak, Assistant Professor, Operations Research Department, Naval Postgraduate School [<1.0 MB]

16. 08/03/00 - David Freedman, University of Berkeley, CA [<1.0 MB]

17. 08/03/00 - James Hahn, City Attorney, Los Angeles [<1.0 MB]

18. 08/03/00 - Barbara Bryant, Ph.D. & Martha Riche, Ph.D., Professional Census 2000 [<1.0 MB]

19. 08/03/00 - Valle Simms Dutcher, Southeastern Legal Foundation, Inc. [<1.0 MB]

20. 08/03/00 - Jerry Coffey, Ph.D., Mathematical Statistician [<1.0 MB]

21. 08/04/00 - U.S. House of Representatives 6 co-signatories [3.3 MB]

22. 08/04/00 - Joe Feagin, Ph.D. & Felice Levine, Ph.D., American Sociological Association [<1.0 MB]

23. 08/04/00 - Frank Ferguson, Deputy Attorney General, Commonwealth of Virginia [<1.0 MB]

24. 08/04/00 - William Seltzer, Senior Research Scholar, Fordham University [<1.0 MB]

Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation - Statement on the Feasibility of Using Statistical Methods To Improve the Accuracy of Census 2000

The statement was published in the Federal Register on June 20, 2000.

Top of Section

Recommendation: Assessment of Accuracy of Adjusted Versus Unadjusted 1990 Census Base for Use in Intercensal Estimates [14 MB]

Top of Section

Census 2000 Decision Memoranda [13 MB]

Memorandum from March 25, 1997 to November 16, 2000

Top of Section

Census 2000 Dress Rehearsal Evaluation Summary [<1.0 MB]

Issued August 1999

Top of Section

Census 2000 Informational Memoranda [<1.0 MB]

Selected informational memorandum issued from January 20, 1999 through November 24, 2000.

Top of Section

(No memorandum assigned to this chapter.)

Top of Section

A.C.E. Review

B-1*, Data and Analysis to Inform the ESCAP Report (Final Report) [3.2 MB]

This report seeks to summarize the data and analysis presented to ESCAP either through the "BSeries,'' or through discussions and presentations.

B-2*, Quality Indicators of Census 2000 and the Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation (Final Report) [1.8 MB]

This report summarizes some overall quality indicators of Census 2000 and the Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation.

B-3*, Quality of Census 2000 Processes (Final Report) [2.3 MB]

This report focuses on the quality of selected Census 2000 processes.

B-4*, Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Survey: Demographic Analysis Results (Final Report) [2.3 MB]

This report focuses on the consistency of the A.C.E. results with findings based on Demographic Analysis (DA).

B-5*, Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation: Person Interviewing Results (Final Report) [3.0 MB]

This report presents detailed information on the results of the Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Survey person interview operation.

B-6*, Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation: Person Matching and Follow-up Results (Final Report) [2.6 MB]

This report focuses on the person matching and follow-up results.

B-7*, Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation: Missing Data Results (Final Report) [3.2 MB]

This report focuses on the extent and effects of missing data in the P and E Samples of the Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation (A.C.E.).

B-8*, Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation: Decomposition of Dual System Estimate Components (Final Report) [2.7 MB]

This report focuses on the decomposition of the P-sample and E-sample dual system estimate components.

B-9*, Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation: Dual System Estimation Results (Final Report) [4.7 MB]

This report focuses on the summary results of the dual system estimates and the coverage correction factors.

B-10*, Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation: Consistency of Post-Stratification Variables (Final Report) [2.0 MB]

This report focuses on the consistency of post-stratification variables between the P sample and E sample.

B-11*, Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation: Variance Estimates by Size of Geographic Area (Final Report) [<1.0 MB]

This report focuses mainly on distributions of coefficients of variation of A.C.E. small-area estimates.

B-12*, Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation: Correlation Bias (Final Report) [<1.0 MB]

This report focuses on investigation and estimation of correlation bias in A.C.E. dual system estimates by comparing them to results from demographic analysis.

B-13*, Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation: Comparing Accuracy (Final Report) [<1.0 MB]

This report summarizes loss function analysis results comparing the accuracy of Census 2000 and the Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation.

B-14*, Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation: Assessment of Synthetic Assumption (Final Report) [1.4 MB]

This report focuses on the Synthetic Assumptions for the 2000 Census Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Survey.

B-15*, Census 2000 — Service Based Enumeration Multiplicity Estimation (Final Report) [<1.0 MB]

Th.is report focuses on the Service Based Enumeration (SBE) Multiplicity Estimation.

B-16*, Demographic Full Count Review: 100% Data Files and Products (Final Report) [1.6 MB]

This report summarizes the Demographic Full Count Revievv· program for 100% data files and products.

B-17*, Census 2000 — Missing Housing Unit Status and Population Data (Final Report) [<1.0 MB]

This report focuses on missing data in the 2000 Census.

B-18*, Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation: Effect of Targeted Extended Search (Final Report) [<1.0 MB]

The report focuses on the effects of the Targeted Extended Search (TES) operation and its effect on the components of the Dual System Estimates.

B-19*, Overview of Total Error Modeling and Loss Function Analysis (Final Report) [2.2 MB]

This report focuses on the methodology and assumptions used to assess total error and to compare uncorrected Census 2000 counts with corrected estimates.

Additional document

Q-43, Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Survey: Effect of Excluding "Late Census Adds" [<1.0 MB]

The discussion will focus on the effect of these removed cases on the A.C.E. expected value, in order to discuss any possible effect on bias.

Top of Section

C-1. Preliminary Analysis of the Dress Rehearsal Data Capture Audit and Resolution (DCAR) Edit and Review and its Redefinition for Census 2000 [Revision 2] [1.9 MB]

C-2. Software Requirements Specification for the Census 2000 Primary Selection Algorithm
(Census Confidential)

C-3. Observation of Data Capture Operation in the Baltimore Data Capture Center on March 30, 2000 [<1.0 MB]

C-4. Specifications for Linking Census Forms and Setting the Expected Return Population Count on the Decennial Response File Replaced by C-5 [1.6 MB]

C-5. Specifications for Identifying Census Continuation Forms and Setting the Expected Return Population Count on the Decennial Response File Replaces C-4. [1.4 MB]

Top of Section

Documents for this series are not available.

Top of Section

E-1. Access to Title 13 Data Capture Files [<1.0 MB]

E-2 (Revised). Request for the Storage of the Asian Language Census Forms [<1.0 MB]

E-3. Request for Census 2000 Operational Statistics [<1.0 MB]

Top of Section

F-1. Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation (A.C.E.) Listing Observation Report--Spartenburg, SC and Charlotte, NC [<1.0 MB]

(Also released as S-FO-32)

Top of Section

G-1. Observation of Block Canvassing in Tampa, FL [<1.0 MB]

G-2. Observation of Block Canvassing–Wave 2, Training and Field Operations In and Around Austin, Texas; February 24-26, 1999 and March 1-2, 1999 [<1.0 MB]

G-3. Observation of Block Canvassing in Alexandria, VA [<1.0 MB]

G-4. Observation of Block Canvassing Lister Training and Quality Assurance Training Wave-2 [<1.0 MB]

G-5. Observation of Lister Training, Crew Leader Assistant Training, and Listing Procedures for Census 2000 Block Canvassing in Nassau County, NY, on April 7-13, 1999 [<1.0 MB]

G-6. Observation of Block Canvassing–Wave 3, In and Around Minneapolis, Minnesota [<1.0 MB]

G-7. Trip Report to Quebecor Petty Plant in Effingham, IL [<1.0 MB]

G-8. Observation of Military Group Quarters Address Listing at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, NY, on April 15, 1999 [<1.0 MB]

G-9. Observation at R.R. Donnelley in Seymour, IN [<1.0 MB]

G-10. Observation of Block Canvassing for Cobb and Fulton County, Georgia on April 26 and 27, 1998 - Wave 3 MAF Extract Layout July 99 Delivery [<1.0 MB]

G-11. Observation of Block Canvassing–Wave 3, Field Operations in Long Beach, California; May 3-6, 1999 [<1.0 MB]

G-12. Observation of Block Canvassing [<1.0 MB]

G-13. Trip Report to Webcraft in New Brunswick, NJ [<1.0 MB]

G-14. Block Canvassing Processing Activities [<1.0 MB]

G-15. Observation of Local Update of Census Addresses 1998 Field Verification [<1.0 MB]

G-16. Observation Report of Agent Field Trial, Telephone Questionnaire Assistance operation, at the National Processing Center [<1.0 MB]

G-17. Trip Report to Communicolor in Hebron, OH [<1.0 MB]

G-18. Visit to View Address Management System of United States Postal Service [<1.0 MB]

G-19. Observation Report of Quality Assurance Representative Field Trial, Telephone Questionnaire Assistance operation, at the National Processing Center [<1.0 MB]

G-20. Observation of Operations Test and Dry Run in Pomona Data Capture Center on November 3 and 4, 1999 [<1.0 MB]

G-21. Observation of Update/Leave in Aguadilla, Puerto Rico [<1.0 MB]

G-22. Observation of Update/Leave Training and Enumeration [1.4 MB]

G-23. Observation of Local Census Office in Providence, RI [<1.0 MB]

G-24. Observation Report – Update/Leave training in Idaho Falls, Idaho [<1.0 MB]

G-25. Observation of Office Operation Update/Enumerate and Group Quarters in Tallahassee, FL [<1.0 MB]

G-26. Specifications for Block Canvassing Asterisks Assignment for Census 2000 [<1.0 MB]

G-27. Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Personal Interview Observation [<1.0 MB]

Top of Section

H-1. Specifications for the Quality Assurance for Local Update of Census Addresses 1999 Reconciliation [<1.0 MB]

Top of Section

I-1. Observation of L/E Field Follow-up North of Cheyenne, Wyoming May 23 and 24, 2000 [<1.0 MB]

I-2. Observing List/Enumerate Operation for the Census 2000 – Reno, Nevada [<1.0 MB]

I-3. Observation of Coverage Edit Follow-up Operation [<1.0 MB]

Top of Section

J-1. Request for Information about Language Assistance Guides [<1.0 MB]

J-2. Request for Check-In Files [<1.0 MB]

J-3. Specifications for the Keying of the D-1402, D-1402(R), D-1402(S), D-1402(V)-Interview of Households in Selected Language Groups, Evaluation of Response Process Census 2000 Evaluation A.5 [3.2 MB]

Top of Section

Documents for this series are not available.

Top of Section

L-1. Documentation of 1990 Response Rates [<1.0 MB]

L-1 (Revised). Documentation of 1990 Response and Return Rates [<1.0 MB]

L-2. Evaluation of Census 2000 Dress Rehearsal Mail Return Rates [1.9 MB]

L-3. Evaluation of Census 2000 Dress Rehearsal Undeliverable As Addressed Mail Returns [1.7 MB]

L-4. Specification for Census 2000 Initial Response Rate Calculation [<1.0 MB]

L-4 (Revised). Specification for Census 2000 Initial Response Rate for the '90 Plus Five Project [<1.0 MB]

L-5. Study Plan for A7.a: Census 2000 Mail Response Rates [<1.0 MB]

L-6 (Revised). Specification for Census 2000 Final Response Rate for the '90 Plus Five Project [<1.0 MB]

L-7. Documentation of Undeliverable Rates for Census 2000 [<1.0 MB]

L-8. Study Plan for A7.b: Census 2000 Mail Return Rates [1.5 MB]

L-9. Requested Files of Census 2000 Preliminary Mail Return Rates and Preliminary Final Mail Return Rates at the Collection Tract and County Levels [<1.0 MB]

L-10. Census 2000 Response and Return Rates – National and State by Form Type [<1.0 MB]

Top of Section

M-1. Specification of the Field Followup Universe for List/Enumerate Areas for Census 2000 [<1.0 MB]

M-2. Trip Report for Owyhee County, ID [<1.0 MB]

M-3. Trip Report, Burlington, Vermont Local Census Office and Observation of List/Enumerate [<1.0 MB]

M-4. Census 2000 List/Enumerate Operation Report – Merced, CA [<1.0 MB]

M-5. Observation of List/Enumerate and Update/Enumerate Operations at the Santa Fe, New Mexico Local Census Office (LCO) [<1.0 MB]

M-6. Observation of Update/Enumerate in the Utah South Local Census Office April 24-26, 2000 [<1.0 MB]

M-7. Trip Report to Billings, Montana for List/Enumerate Observation [<1.0 MB]

M-8. M-8 was issued in error.
Memorandum was reassigned as II-43.

M-9. Trip Report for the Observation of List/Enumerate in Maricopa County, Arizona and a Questionnaire Assistance Center in Phoenix, Arizona [<1.0 MB]

Top of Section

N-1. Specifications for the Quality Assurance for Update/Leave [<1.0 MB]

N-2. Proposal to Create a Report of Update/Leave Deletes [<1.0 MB]

N-3. Census 2000 Update/Leave Trip Report [<1.0 MB]

N-4. Observation of Update/Leave and Urban Update/Leave Enumeration Procedures in Southwestern Louisiana [<1.0 MB]

N-5. Observation of Update/Enumerate Palm Springs, CA April 13-14, 2000 [<1.0 MB]

N-6. Observation of the Update/Leave and Urban Update/Leave Operations [<1.0 MB]

Top of Section

O-1. Specifications for the Quality Assurance for Military Group Quarters Address Listing [<1.0 MB]

O-2. Observation of Facility Questionnaire Personal Visit Training in Baltimore, MD [<1.0 MB]

O-3. Request To Use a "Just in Case" Box on Group Quarters and T-Night Questionnaires to Facilitate Analysis of Data Completeness [<1.0 MB]

O-4. Observation of Facility Questionnaire Personal Visits in Pittsburgh, PA [<1.0 MB]

O-5. Transcription of Group Quarters (GQ) ID Numbers on GQ Enumeration Forms [<1.0 MB]

O-6. Census 2000 Unduplication of the Service-Based Enumeration [<1.0 MB]

O-6R (Revised). Specification for the Census 2000 Unduplication of the Service-Based Enumeration Universe [<1.0 MB]

O-7. Observation of Operational Test and Dry Run of Group Quarters Forms at the Data Capture Center in Jeffersonville, IN [<1.0 MB]

O-8. Service-Based Enumeration Observation Trip Report (Fort Worth, Texas) [<1.0 MB]

O-9. Service-Based Enumeration Observation Trip Report (Oakland, California) [<1.0 MB]

O-10. Transient Night Observation Trip Report (Oakland, California) [<1.0 MB]

O-11. Group Quarters Enumeration Observation Report–St. Louis, Missouri [<1.0 MB]

O-12. Census Observation of Group Quarters Enumeration–Seattle, Washington [<1.0 MB]

O-13. Observation of Group Quarters Enumeration and LCO Operations in Kansas City, Kansas, on April 25-27, 2000 [<1.0 MB]

O-14. Specification for Setting the Official Population for Each Group Quarters in the Special Place/Group Quarters Universe [<1.0 MB]

O-15. Specification for Updating the Decennial Master Address File in August 2000 with Changes to the Special Place/Group Quarters Universe [<1.0 MB]

Top of Section

P-1. Observation of Questionnaire Assistance Center Clerk training at the Alexandria Local Census Office [<1.0 MB]

P-2. Trip Report to Fairfax, VA to Observe Questionnaire Assistance Center Clerk Training [<1.0 MB]

P-3. Observation of Questionnaire Assistance Center and Be Counted Operations in the Chicago Far North Local Census Office [<1.0 MB]

P-4. Specifications for the Keying of the Record of Contact at Questionnaire Assistance Center, Form #D-3999 [<1.0 MB]

P-5. Request for a File Containing Geocoding Results and Normalized Files of Questionnaire without a Master Address File ID [<1.0 MB]

Top of Section

(Not all documents for this series are available.)

Q-43. Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Survey: Effect of Excluding "Late Census Adds" [<1.0 MB]

Q-49. Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Survey – P Sample Sizes for the 64 Post-stratum Groups [<1.0 MB]

Q-64. Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation (A.C.E.) Survey – Census Imputations by Post-stratum [<1.0 MB]

Top of Section

R-1. Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Survey: American Indian Reservations Sample Design [<1.0 MB]

R-2. Census 2000 Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Survey: Sample Allocation and Poststratification Plans [1.1 MB]

R-3. Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation (ACE) Survey: Block Cluster Sample Selection Specification [2.2 MB]

R-4. Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation (ACE) Survey: Sample Summary File and Sample Design File Documentation [<1.0 MB]

R-5. Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation (ACE) Survey: Universe File and Block Cluster Sampling Parameter File Specification [2.5 MB]

R-6. Sample Design Information for the Office of Management and Budget [<1.0 MB]

R-7. Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Survey: Sample Size Estimates [<1.0 MB]

R-8. Census 2000 Specifications for Block Cluster Formation–Reissue [1.3 MB]

R-9. Amendment to Census 2000 Specifications for Block Cluster Formation–Reissue [<1.0 MB]

R-10. Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation (ACE) Survey: Second Amendment to Census 2000 Specifications for Block Cluster Formation–Reissue [<1.0 MB]

R-11. Census 2000 ICM: Sample Size Estimates–Reissue [<1.0 MB]

R-12. Census 2000 ICM: County Sample Size Estimates–Reissue [<1.0 MB]

R-13. Census 2000 Post-Enumeration Survey: Updated County Sample Size Estimates–Reissue [<1.0 MB]

R-14. Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Survey: Updated County Sample Size Estimates [<1.0 MB]

R-15. Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Survey: State Interview Sample Size Estimates [<1.0 MB]

R-16. Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Survey: Initial Listing Sample Results [<1.0 MB]

R-17. Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Survey: Transmittal of Initial Listing Sampling Clusters [<1.0 MB]

R-18. Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Survey: Sample Reduction Overview [<1.0 MB]

R-19. Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Survey: Differential Allocation of Sample within State by Demographics [1.6 MB]

R-20. Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Survey: Identification and Sampling of Block Clusters for Targeted Extended Search [<1.0 MB]

R-21. Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Survey: County Sample Size Estimates [<1.0 MB]

R-22. Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Survey: Cluster Reduction Contingency Plan [<1.0 MB]

R-23. Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Survey: Approval and Summary of Results of the Reduction Sample [<1.0 MB]

R-24. Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Survey: Small Block Cluster Subsampling [<1.0 MB]

R-25. Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation: Small Block Cluster Subsampling Approval and Summary of Results [<1.0 MB]

R-26. Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation: Large Block Cluster Subsampling Parameter File Specifications [<1.0 MB]

R-27. Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation: Large Block Cluster Subsampling Specifications [1.4 MB]

Replaced by R-38

R-28. Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Survey: Approval and Summary of Large Block Cluster Subsampling Parameter File [<1.0 MB]

R-29. Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Survey: Reduction Specification [1.2 MB]

R-30. Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Survey: Transmittal of Estimated Interview Workload After Large Block Cluster Subsampling [<1.0 MB]

R-31. Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Survey: Specification for E-Sample Identification [1.1 MB]

Replaced by R-39

R-32. Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Survey: Large Block Cluster Subsampling Approval and Summary of Results [<1.0 MB]

R-33. Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Survey: Sample Design Summary [<1.0 MB]

R-34. Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Survey: Additions to the Sample Design File Version 5 [<1.0 MB]

R-35. Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Survey: Metropolitan Area Sample Sizes [<1.0 MB]

R-36. Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Survey: Approval of TES Sample Selection [<1.0 MB]

R-37. Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Survey: E-Sample Identification Approval and Summary of Results [1.4 MB]

R-38. Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation: Final Large Block Cluster Subsampling Specifications [2.8 MB]

Replaces R-27

R-39. Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Survey: Final Specification for E-Sample Identification [2.1 MB]

Replaces R-31

R-40. Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation: P-Sample and E-Sample Weights [<1.0 MB]

R-41. Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Survey: County Sample Sizes in the United States [<1.0 MB]

Top of Section

(Not all documents for this series are available.)

S-CL. Clerical Processing Team
S-CO. A.C.E. Computer Processing Team
S-DT. A.C.E. Design Team

Chapter S-DT-1. Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation: The Design Document [5.6 MB]

Chapter S-DT-1, Revised. Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation: The Design Document [3.0 MB]

Chapter S-DT-2. Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation: Overview of the Design [1.1 MB]

Chapter S-DT-3. Specifications for Identifying the P-sample [<1.0 MB]

Chapter S-DT-4. 2000 Census Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation Outlier File Delivery Specifications [<1.0 MB]

Chapter S-DT-5. Specifications for Computer Preprocessing for Missing Data Input Files for the Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation (A.C.E.) [<1.0 MB]

Chapter S-DT-5r1. Specifications for Computer Preprocessing for Missing Data Input Files for the Accuracy and Coverage Evaluation (A.C.E.) Revision 1 [<1.0 MB]

Chapter S-DT-6. Algorithm for Determining Outlier Clusters in the 2000 A.C.E. [<1.0 MB]

Chapter S-DT-7. Coding of Potential Fictitious and Lived Elsewhere on Census Day [<1.0 MB]

S-FA. A.C.E. Field Automation Team
S-FH. Final Housing Unit Team
S-FO. A.C.E. Field Observations
S-FT. A.C.E. Field Team
S-GM. General Specification/Memoranda
S-HU. A.C.E. Housing Unit Team
S-IT. A.C.E. Interview Team
S-PT. Person Team
S-QA. A.C.E. Quality Assurance Team
S-QD. A.C.E. Questionnaire Design Team