Inconsistent Search Results
Users may experience issues with the search function. We encourage you to browse our pages manually through the navigation until this is resolved. Thank you for your patience.

Comparing Automatic Modeling Procedures of TRAMO and X-12-ARIMA, an Update

Written by:

Abstract

The U.S. Census Bureau's enhanced X-12-ARIMA seasonal adjustment program includes the automatic ARIMA (Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average) model selection procedure developed by Statistics Canada and a second procedure based on the automatic procedure of TRAMO (Time series Regression with ARIMA noise, Missing observations and Outliers), a modeling package developed by Victor Gómez and Agustín Maravall. Each program has automatic identification of key regressors, allowing for full automatic selection of a regARIMA model (regression with an underlying ARIMA process). X-12-ARIMA's procedure differs from TRAMO's in a number of ways. Our study updates previous work as we compared the procedures again using improved versions of the two programs. We applied the procedures to a set of Census Bureau time series and simulations. When model choices differed, we compared standard modeling diagnostics to look for a consistent preference for either procedure. As in the previous study, we found that X-12-ARIMA still seems to choose trading day effects more appropriately than TRAMO. However, we found that X-12-ARIMA inaccurately identifies Easter effects more often than TRAMO. Overall, we found that the diagnostics for the X-12-ARIMA models were at least as good as the diagnostics from TRAMO models.

Page Last Revised - October 8, 2021