U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Skip Header

Ensuring a Robust and Accurate Data Quality Analysis in the 2020 Census

Written by:

Asking outside experts to review our work is standard operating procedure at the U.S. Census Bureau. It underscores our commitment to quality and transparency. 

In a blog earlier this month, Acting Census Bureau Director Ron Jarmin touched on the steps we are taking to assess the quality of the 2020 Census. These steps include the establishment last April of the Data Quality Executive Guidance Group (chaired by Dr. Jarmin) to ensure resources are adequately and appropriately focused on addressing and documenting data quality issues. Dr. Jarmin also mentioned that we are working with outside experts who are examining our quality metrics and reviewing our processes, procedures and decisions related to the 2020 Census.

In this blog, I take a closer look at the groups of experts we’ve engaged and at the work they are doing with us.

To date, we have asked two highly respected groups to provide an external assessment of the decennial census and are working to engage a third. These organizations are:

  • JASON – JASON is an independent group of scientists and engineers with expertise in a variety of technical areas leveraged to perform studies for government sponsors. JASON has already completed multiple studies for the Census Bureau, covering various aspects of the 2020 Census and other Census Bureau operations.
  • The American Statistical Association (ASA) Quality Indicators Task Force – The ASA has long shown an interest in the decennial census, and it includes experts who know our work well. Before, during and following every decennial census, we work closely with the ASA on the research and development of the operational design of the census, and the production and analysis of the data.
  • National Academy of Sciences (NAS) Committee on National Statistics – Similar to the ASA, the NAS has worked with the Census Bureau each decade, and it too includes many experts familiar with our work. Over the decades, CNSTAT has established panels to assess each decennial census and to suggest parameters for the research and planning of the subsequent censuses. At the moment, we are still planning on how the NAS/CNSTAT will engage with the 2020 Census. We hope to have an update on this effort in the weeks ahead.

These three groups will tackle different aspects of assessing the Census Bureau’s work. Their reports will advise the Census Bureau on improving future censuses and will help the public understand the quality of the 2020 Census data.  

The JASON Study

The JASON study will be the first in this series. Importantly, the JASON study did not examine 2020 Census data. Rather, its goal was to identify strengths and weaknesses in our plans for data quality assessments and metrics, and to inform our efforts to communicate important aspects of data quality that could accompany release of 2020 Census data products.

JASON was given a broad scope to review and assess Census Bureau plans, processes, procedures and metrics around 2020 Census data quality. It conducted its work Jan. 4-Feb. 8, 2021. This engagement provided us with a timely reality check on our plans for assessing 2020 Census data quality. JASON has provided us with recommendations and insights supporting 2020 Census efforts to provide quality data and informative metrics.

The JASON report, set to be released today, calls for implementation of improved communications strategies that explain the 2020 Census in a way that builds confidence that the Census Bureau will achieve an accurate count. It also recommends that we ensure that our post-data collection processing schedule allows adequate time for complete, accurate and transparent processing of the data. This blog series and associated briefings, press releases, press availability, and announcements of our dates for producing the apportionment and redistricting data all reflect our agreement with these recommendations.

JASON also expressed support for the Census Bureau’s proposed metrics as useful to evaluate data quality and provided recommendations for additional analysis such as assessments of data quality across various geographies and for relevant demographic groups. Upcoming blogs and briefings, in addition to our work throughout the year, will articulate our response to these recommendations as well. 

Finally, JASON stresses the importance of leveraging our experience with the 2020 Census to inform planning for and the operational design of the 2030 Census. This work is already underway.

Future External Assessments

Experts from the ASA are already working closely with us to build on the JASON report. Unlike JASON, the ASA is diving into the internal operational and response data from the 2020 Census to help us understand the accuracy and coverage of our enumeration of the nation’s residents. This independent work will unfold over the next year and will move in real-time along with Census Bureau assessments of data quality. The ASA has posted updates about this work on its website.

As mentioned earlier, we’re still planning the work we will be doing with the NAS/CNSTAT and expect to have more details to share in the weeks ahead.

Throughout our effort to establish and implement quality metrics on the 2020 Census, we will be open and transparent about what we learn. We are charging these external experts to conduct their work independently, and we look forward to their findings. Stay tuned to this blog series and our associated communications efforts to learn more about this important work.

Related blogs

Random Samplings Blog
Upcoming 2020 Census Coverage Estimates
The U.S. Census Bureau released coverage estimates for the 2020 Census.

Random Samplings Blog
The Post-Enumeration Survey: Measuring Coverage Error
Although we undertake extensive efforts to accurately count everyone in the decennial census, sometimes people are missed or duplicated.

Random Samplings Blog
Using Demographic Benchmarks to Help Evaluate 2020 Census Results
One of the primary methods of evaluating the quality of a census is comparing the results to other population benchmarks.

Random Samplings Blog
Programa de Evaluaciones y Experimentos del Censo del 2020
Este blog describe la serie de evaluaciones formales que miden diferentes aspectos de las operaciones del censo y los desafíos.

Random Samplings Blog
2020 Census Program for Evaluations, Experiments, and Assessments
This blog describes the series of formal evaluations and assessments that measure different aspects of census operations and specific challenges.

Random Samplings Blog
Improvements to the 2020 Census Race and Hispanic Origin Question Designs, Data Processing, and Coding Procedures
This blog discusses how we improved the census questions on race and Hispanic origin, also known as ethnicity, between 2010 and 2020.

Random Samplings Blog
Improvements to the 2020 Census Race and Hispanic Origin Question Designs, Data Processing, and Coding Procedures
This blog discusses how we improved the census questions on race and Hispanic origin, also known as ethnicity, between 2010 and 2020.

Random Samplings Blog
How We Complete the Census When Demographic and Housing Characteristics Are Missing
Although we strive to obtain all demographic and housing data from every individual in the census, missing data are part of every census process.

Random Samplings Blog
Censo del 2020: Métricas de calidad, Publicación 2
Este blog proporciona datos destacados del segundo grupo de métricas operacionales de calidad del Censo del 2020.

Random Samplings Blog
2020 Census Operational Quality Metrics: Release 2
Today we released the second round of 2020 Census operational quality metrics.

Random Samplings Blog
Examining Operational Quality Metrics
The Census Bureau is taking a multifaceted approach to studying the quality of the 2020 Census, so as to produce a more complete and informative picture.

Random Samplings Blog
Comparisons to Benchmarks as a Measure of Quality
Data quality is multidimensional and so approaching it from multiple angles produces a more insightful and holistic picture of a dataset.

Random Samplings Blog
2020 Census Data Review
For the 2020 Census, we are conducting one of the most comprehensive reviews in recent census history.

Random Samplings Blog
Revisión de los datos del Censo del 2020
En este blog hablamos sobre cómo estamos realizando una de las revisiones de datos más completas en la historia reciente del censo, para el Censo del 2020.

Random Samplings Blog
Completing the Census When Households or Group Quarters Don't Respond
As we continue to process 2020 Census responses, people have asked what happens when we don’t get a response from an address.

Random Samplings Blog
Cómo completamos el censo cuando los hogares no responden
Mientras continuamos procesando las respuestas al Censo del 2020, las personas han preguntado qué sucede cuando no obtenemos una respuesta de una dirección.

Random Samplings Blog
Administrative Records and the 2020 Census
Each decade we are asked, “Why don’t you just use the information the government already has about me for the census? Why ask me again?”

Random Samplings Blog
Los registros administrativos y el Censo del 2020
Este blog describe cómo el Censo del 2020 usó los registros administrativos para contar a las personas que no respondieron.

Random Samplings Blog
Introduction to Quality Indicators: Operational Metrics
In the coming weeks, the U.S. Census Bureau will release the first set of results from the 2020 Census. Our goal for every census is to count everyone once, only once, and in the right place.

Random Samplings Blog
2020 Census Group Quarters
As we continue processing 2020 Census results, we’d like to provide more information on how we count people living in group quarters (GQs).

Random Samplings Blog
Finding 'Anomalies' Illustrates 2020 Census Quality Checks Are Working
We’re in the midst of data processing for the 2020 Census. As Acting Census Bureau Director Ron Jarmin acknowledged in a recent blog, we’ve discovered some “anomalies” along the way that we’re looking into and resolving.

Random Samplings Blog
Encontrar ‘anomalías’ demuestra que los controles de calidad funcionan
El 9 de marzo de 2021, la Oficina del Censo de los EE. UU. publicó un blog (en inglés) sobre las “anomalías” que encontramos al procesar los datos del Censo del 2020.

Random Samplings Blog
Adapting Field Operations to Meet Unprecedented Challenges
As we process census responses and analyze the quality of the 2020 Census, it’s helpful to look back at some of the unprecedented challenges we faced during this census.

Random Samplings Blog
Adaptación de las operaciones de campo para enfrentar desafíos
La oficina del Censo de los EE. UU. compartió información en una publicación de blog el 1 de marzo de 2021, acerca de cómo la realización de un censo es una tarea enorme, incluso en circunstancias ideales.

Random Samplings Blog
Ensuring a Robust and Accurate Data Quality Analysis in the 2020 Census
Asking outside experts to review our work is standard operating procedure at the U.S. Census Bureau. It underscores our commitment to quality and transparency.

Random Samplings Blog
Timeline for Releasing Redistricting Data
We expect to deliver the redistricting data to the states and the public by Sept. 30, 2021.

Random Samplings Blog
Census Data Processing 101
Michael Thieme describes how census data processing works to ensure the census is accurate.

Director's Blog
2020 Census Processing Updates
I’m writing to provide an update on data processing for the 2020 Census.

Random Samplings Blog
Update on 2020 Census Data Processing and Quality
The Census Bureau has begun processing the data collected for the 2020 Census. Data collection for the decennial census is always a herculean task and 2020 was no exception.

Page Last Revised - October 8, 2021
Is this page helpful?
Thumbs Up Image Yes Thumbs Down Image No
255 characters maximum 255 characters maximum reached
Thank you for your feedback.
Comments or suggestions?


Back to Header